Summary
What we read, and from where
Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.
- Inspection date verified
24 Jun 2021
- Inspectorssingle source
Mike Finn
- Postcode verified
SE17 3PY
- Name on report verified
Reed In Partnership
- URN verified
2635821
Deep dive
What this report says
In plain English
Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.
Tone of the report
How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.
In line with other reports of this type.
How the report reads, start to finish
Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.
Strengths
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
No standout praise found.
Concerns
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
No strong criticism found.
Next steps
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
No next steps set out.
What the report dwells on
Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.
Teaching & assessment7
“As a result, leaders support staff effectively to improve their teaching practice.” p.2
Anatomy of the report
How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.
- Pages
- 5
- Words of findings
- 1,140
- about usual (typical 1049)
- Reading level
- Hard
- Flesch 44, typical 45
- Average sentence
- 19 words
- Next steps
- 0
- typical 5
- Hedged sentences
- 5%
- “some”, “not always”, “most”…
Where the words go
Full report text
Reed In Partnership Monitoring visit report
p.1
Name of lead inspector: Mike Finn, Her Majesty’s Inspector
p.1
Type of provider: Independent learning provider
p.1
Address: 31 Amelia Street London SE17 3PY Monitoring visit: Reed In Partnership, 23–24 June 2021
p.1
Context and focus of visit
From March 2019, Ofsted undertook to carry out monitoring visits to all newly directly funded providers of adult learning provision which began to be funded from August 2017 or after by the Education and Skills Funding Agency. This monitoring visit was undertaken as part of those arrangements and as outlined in the ‘Further education and skills inspection handbook’, especially the sections entitled ‘Monitoring visits’ and ‘Monitoring visits to providers that are newly directly publicly funded’. The focus of these visits is on the themes set out below.
p.2
Context and focus of visit
Reed In Partnership provides a wide range of employment services with an aim positively to transform people and their communities. They have established an adult education programme to fit alongside the wider employability services offered. Three hundred and seventeen learners are enrolled on the skills for jobs programme, with the aim of developing learners’ employability skills to help them into employment.
p.2
Context and focus of visit
During the pandemic, the course has been taught online.
p.2
Context and focus of visit
The impact of COVID-19 (coronavirus) has been taken into account in the findings and progress judgements below.
p.2
Reasonable progress
Leaders have ensured that courses align closely with the wider employability support programmes offered by the business. Leaders design adult education courses so that they will be useful to learners when starting employment. For example, they have selected to teach units about problem-solving at work and customer service, as they have identified that these areas are a priority for learners. As a result, courses have a good focus on helping learners to take a positive next step into employment or further study.
p.2
Reasonable progress
Leaders and tutors adapt the curriculum to suit the needs of learners. For example, they have adjusted the customer service unit by working with the examination body to change the end-of-unit assessment to make it more purposeful and useful for learners.
p.2
Reasonable progress
Leaders have recruited tutors and advisers who are experienced and well-qualified to support them in their roles. They have also provided them with a range of training opportunities to develop them in their role, for example development sessions about Monitoring visit: Reed In Partnership, 23–24 June 2021 leading group training sessions with confidence. As a result, leaders support staff effectively to improve their teaching practice.
p.2
Reasonable progress
Leaders have not yet ensured that they have a secure enough understanding of the strengths and weaknesses of the provision. Consequently, they do not put in place effective strategies for further improvement. At the same time, they do not have strong enough governance to help them in this task.
p.3
Reasonable progress
Most learners on the programme have been out of the workplace for some time and all have been referred to the programme by Jobcentre Plus, or other organisations. Leaders and tutors carry out appropriate assessments to identify learners who are most likely to benefit from the course. Consequently, they only place learners onto the programme when it will support them with their individual employability or social needs.
p.3
Reasonable progress
Tutors support learners to develop new knowledge about tackling problems in the workplace. For example, learners know that problems can be dealt with in a range of ways, and they can be viewed from a variety of perspectives. As a result, learners are suitably prepared to solve problems at work when they start employment.
p.3
Reasonable progress
Tutors and advisers set and review helpful targets with learners to guide them to develop their self-resilience. Consequently, most learners develop their confidence as a result of being on the programme. For example, they are now applying for employment and exploring sectors that they have not considered previously.
p.3
Reasonable progress
Learners who inspectors spoke with consistently praise the quality of training and individual support offered by tutors and advisers. They also benefit from the extensive careers guidance they receive alongside their programme. For example, staff send them relevant job vacancies, and provide support to learners when writing cover letters and developing a curriculum vitae.
p.3
Reasonable progress
Tutors give useful verbal feedback to learners in lessons. Small groups of learners attend the online sessions and tutors are able to give individual feedback at regular intervals through the day. However, tutors do not ensure that feedback in learners’ course workbooks is constructive. In their feedback they do not specifically indicate how learners can improve the standard of their written work. Monitoring visit: Reed In Partnership, 23–24 June 2021 At the start of the course tutors assess learners’ knowledge and use of English and mathematics. However, they do not use the outcomes of these assessments to plan and teach components of either subject to help bridge gaps in learners’ knowledge.
p.3
Reasonable progress
Tutors and advisers get to know learners well. As a result, learners feel safe and comfortable with their tutors and advisers, and they feel able to turn to them for support.
p.4
Reasonable progress
Leaders have put in place robust suitability checks when recruiting staff. These include employment reference checks, as well as disclosure and barring service clearance.
p.4
Reasonable progress
The designated safeguarding lead (DSL) ensures that staff are well trained to undertake their roles. Additional training in specialist areas, such as suicide prevention and mental health first aid, has further developed their awareness of how to effectively support learners.
p.4
Reasonable progress
Leaders do not ensure that tutors recap sufficiently learners’ understanding of safeguarding topics. As a result, too few learners can remember what they have been taught about how to keep themselves safe.
p.4
Reasonable progress
Leaders do not ensure that tutors and advisers report all minor concerns they may have about learners. As a result, the DSL is not aware of the full range of issues faced by learners. Monitoring visit: Reed In Partnership, 23–24 June 2021 regulates and inspects to achieve excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children’s social care, and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory and Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, further education and skills, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and other secure establishments. It assesses council children’s services, and inspects services for children looked after, safeguarding and child protection.
p.4
Reasonable progress
If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please telephone 0300 123 1231, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk .
p.5
Reasonable progress
You may reuse this information (not including logos) free of charge in any format or medium, under the terms of the Open Government Licence. To view this licence, visit www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-government-licence/ , write to the Information Policy Team, The National Archives, Kew, London TW9 4DU, or email: psi@nationalarchives.gsi.gov.uk .
p.5
Reasonable progress
Interested in our work? You can subscribe to our monthly newsletter for more information and updates: http://eepurl.com/iTrDn .
p.5
Reasonable progress
T: 0300 123 1231 Textphone: 0161 618 8524 E: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk W: www.gov.uk/ofsted
p.5
Discuss this inspection
Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.
Join the discussion