Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Other · Ofsted report

City University

Inspected 1 Jul 2021 · published 4 Aug 2021 · URN 133815

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

Peter Nelson

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspection datesingle source

    1 Jul 2021

  • Inspectorssingle source

    Peter Nelson

  • Postcode verified

    EX1V 0HB

  • Name on report verified

    City University

  • URN verified

    133815

Page 1 of 5
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+58Positivemore positive than 57% of reports of this type

In line with other reports of this type.

Praisestrongclearstronglysuccessfullysuccessfulconfidentconfidentlysecure
Criticismconcernsbelownot robustnot clearly

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

Findings positive critical

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No strong criticism found.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
5
Words of findings
1,188
about usual (typical 1049)
Reading level
Very hard
Flesch 28, typical 45
Average sentence
19 words
Next steps
4
typical 5
Hedged sentences
3%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 100%

Full report text

Name of lead inspector: Peter Nelson, Her Majesty’s Inspector

p.1

Type of provider: Higher education institution

p.1

Address: Northampton Square London EX1V 0HB Monitoring visit: City University, 30 June-1 July 2021

p.1

Context and focus of visit

From October 2018, Ofsted undertook to carry out monitoring visits to all newly directly funded providers of apprenticeship training provision which began to be funded from April 2017 or after by the Education and Skills Funding Agency (ESFA) and/or the apprenticeship levy. This monitoring visit was undertaken as part of those arrangements and as outlined in the ‘Further education and skills inspection handbook’, especially the sections entitled ‘Monitoring visits’ and ‘Monitoring visits to providers that are newly directly publicly funded’. The focus of these visits is on the themes set out below.

p.2

Context and focus of visit

The university teaches senior leader, level solicitor, advanced clinical practice, digital and technology solutions apprenticeships at level 7. It teaches the nursing associate apprenticeship at level 5. At the time of the visit, there were around 280 apprentices on these programmes.

p.2

Context and focus of visit

During the COVID-19 (coronavirus) restrictions, managers and tutors adapted much of the curriculum, so they could teach all programmes online. At the time of the visit, staff continued to teach all programmes online. However, managers anticipate moving back to some face-to-face activities in the very near future. The impact of COVID-19 has been taken into account in the findings and progress judgements below.

p.2

Reasonable progress

Leaders at the university show a strong commitment to develop and expand apprenticeships alongside their existing programmes. The university has invested significantly in the launch of the apprenticeship programme. Managers have a clear strategy for this growth and development, building on well-established relationships with employers and strong areas of vocational expertise within the university.

p.2

Reasonable progress

Leaders have developed an apprenticeship programme that fulfils the requirements of the apprenticeship standards, and fits well with the university’s mission to provide ‘training for business and the professions’. Managers design courses that link strongly with employers’ requirements. For example, managers have worked in conjunction with local National Health Service trusts to customise the senior leadership programme, for medical consultants, and run the programme as an executive apprenticeship in medical leadership. This helps to provide the knowledge Monitoring visit: City University, 30 June-1 July 2021 and skills the consultants need as they progress into key leadership positions within the health trusts.

p.2

Reasonable progress

Leaders plan the apprenticeship programme to help widen participation and increase diversity at the university. In partnership with the employers, they recruit many apprentices who might otherwise not have the opportunity to study at this level. For example, the law society promotes the level 7 solicitor apprenticeship route as a valuable alternative route into the industry.

p.3

Reasonable progress

Staff at the university are well-qualified and highly experienced in their respective fields. The academic research of key staff helps underpin the rationale, for example, for the development of leadership programmes at the university.

p.3

Reasonable progress

Managers have sound quality assurance processes in place. They have correctly identified the need to create greater consistency in practice between different business units within the university. For example, they are taking action to standardise how staff collate and manage apprentices’ coursework and performance data and provide feedback to apprentices on their work. They recognise how this will enable managers to access more consistent information on apprentices’ performance.

p.3

Reasonable progress

Managers and tutors design a curriculum and teaching methods that fit well with the workplace commitments of the apprentices. Tutors have successfully adapted teaching during the COVID-19 restrictions, with virtually all teaching moving online. This has helped reduce the impact of the restrictions on the apprentices’ continued development.

p.3

Reasonable progress

Tutors structure the programme well and provide a good blend of teaching, review and coaching for apprentices. The apprentices particularly value the coaching component which helps them identify and address any professional barriers and shapes their longer-term career planning.

p.3

Reasonable progress

Tutors support apprentices to develop the skills they need to be successful on their programme. For example, advanced clinical practitioner apprentices learn how to use a mix of clinical observations and medical data to present a clear rationale for different diagnoses. This helps apprentices become more confident in applying their knowledge in the workplace.

p.3

Reasonable progress

Many apprentices talk confidently about how their new-found knowledge, skills and behaviours help them gain greater recognition and acquire new responsibilities in the Monitoring visit: City University, 30 June-1 July 2021 workplace. For example, apprentice solicitors learn how to secure rights of audience in the magistrates’ courts, a task usually only open to fully qualified solicitors.

p.3

Reasonable progress

Course leaders have been flexible around the extenuating circumstances created by the recent COVID-19 restrictions. They have worked closely with professional bodies to adapt programmes and introduce alternative assessment strategies. As a result, apprentices have been able to continue to progress on their programmes.

p.4

Reasonable progress

Tutors in different departments use different systems for storing apprentices’ work, providing feedback, and monitoring progress. As a result, managers do not have a robust or timely oversight of apprentices’ progress. On occasion, tutors do not explain clearly to apprentices what they need to do to achieve higher grades. Not all apprentices fully recognise or understand what components of their programme contribute to the off-the-job course component.

p.4

Reasonable progress

The university has appropriate safeguarding policies and procedures in place. Apprentices feel safe. Most know what action to take should they have any concerns. Each school within the university has a welfare officer who is available to provide additional support to those apprentices who might require it.

p.4

Reasonable progress

Employers appreciate the support and guidance they receive from university staff to help assure the welfare and safety of apprentices. They speak positively about the personal and pastoral support that apprentices receive. They are particularly appreciative of staff at the university who provided significant additional support to apprentices when they experienced bereavement during the pandemic.

p.4

Reasonable progress

Key staff at the university have strong links with local networks, including the Islington ‘Prevent’ duty partnership board, the Metropolitan Police and the local counter terrorism group. This helps ensure that staff are well-informed about any possible risks or threats to apprentices in the area. Monitoring visit: City University, 30 June-1 July 2021 regulates and inspects to achieve excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children’s social care, and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory and Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, further education and skills, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and other secure establishments. It assesses council children’s services, and inspects services for children looked after, safeguarding

p.4

Reasonable progress

If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please telephone 0300 123 1231, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk .

p.5

Reasonable progress

You may reuse this information (not including logos) free of charge in any format or medium, under the terms of the Open Government Licence. To view this licence, visit www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-government-licence/ , write to the Information Policy Team, The National Archives, Kew, London TW9 4DU, or email: psi@nationalarchives.gsi.gov.uk .

p.5

Reasonable progress

Interested in our work? You can subscribe to our monthly newsletter for more information and updates: http://eepurl.com/iTrDn .

p.5

Reasonable progress

T: 0300 123 1231 Textphone: 0161 618 8524 E: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk W: www.gov.uk/ofsted

p.5

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion