Summary
What we read, and from where
Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.
- Inspection datesingle source
7 Jul 2021
- URN verified
103842
Deep dive
What this report says
In plain English
Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.
Tone of the report
How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.
In line with other reports of this type.
How the report reads, start to finish
Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.
Strengths
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
No standout praise found.
Concerns
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
Next steps
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
What the report dwells on
Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.
Anatomy of the report
How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.
- Pages
- 3
- Words of findings
- 504
- longer than usual (typical 317)
- Reading level
- Hard
- Flesch 39, typical 35
- Average sentence
- 17 words
- Next steps
- 1
- typical 5
- Hedged sentences
- 3%
- “some”, “not always”, “most”…
Where the words go
Full report text
Summary of outcome
Her Majesty's Chief Inspector of Education, Children's Services and Skills is leading Ofsted's work into how regulated early years and childcare providers in England have delivered child- centred practice and care, within the context of the restrictions placed on society during the COVID-19 (coronavirus) pandemic.
p.1
Summary of outcome
All early years providers must meet the legal requirements in the Statutory framework for the early years foundation stage, which you can find at www.gov.uk/government/publications/early-years-foundation-stage-framework--2. If we find that a provider is not meeting the requirements, we can take action to ensure they put matters right.
p.1
Summary of outcome
On 19 May 2021, we carried out an inspection and found the provider was not meeting some of these requirements. The overall effectiveness of the provision was judged to be inadequate. The inspection report sets out the actions the provider was required to take to meet the requirements.
p.1
Summary of outcome
On 7 June 2021, we carried out an unannounced regulatory visit. The focus of the visit was to check whether the provider had met the safeguarding and welfare actions raised at their last inspection.
p.1
Summary of outcome
We found that the provider had ensured that all staff, including the Designated Safeguarding lead, know the importance of making safeguarding referrals in a timely and appropriate way. Recruitment processes had improved to help ensure staff were suitable for their roles and responsibilities. Children have daily access to outdoor play. The provider had appropriate systems to ensure that all staff receive supervision and support to help them fulfil their roles and responsibilities and manage their workload.
p.1
Summary of outcome
However, we found that the provider had not met all the actions set. We therefore served a welfare requirements notice. This is a legal notice that requires the provider to take the actions below within the timescales set out. The provider will be able to give parents further information about this.
p.1
Summary of outcome
n supply all the necessary information to Ofsted relating to new committee members so the relevant checks can be completed
p.2
Summary of outcome
n take action to implement an effective risk assessment, with particular regard to the outdoor area and keeping fire exits free from obstruction
p.2
Summary of outcome
n ensure that staff manage children's behaviour effectively to enable children to receive consistent messages and help them understand behaviour expectations
p.2
Summary of outcome
n maintain accurate child protection records for all relevant children to help monitor any concerns.
p.2
Summary of outcome
On 23 June 2021, we conducted an unannounced visit to the setting and found that the provider had taken action to meet the welfare requirements notice. They had provided the required information to Ofsted with regard to the new committee members so that suitability checks can be completed. The provider had reviewed the risk assessment, specifically the outdoor area and fire exits were free from obstruction during the visit. Staff managed children's behaviour well. The provider had taken steps to address the weaknesses identified in recording child protection matters. We hold continued concern that the provider is not able to sustain improvements.
p.2
Summary of outcome
We initiated steps to cancel the provider's registration. The provider objected to our intention and subsequently resigned their registration.
p.2
Summary of outcome
The provider is no longer registered with Ofsted.
p.2
Discuss this inspection
Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.
Join the discussion