Social care · Children's home inspection (SCCIF)
Children's home run by Hillcrest Children’s Services Ltd
Summary
Peter Jackson (lead), Anne-Marie Davies
What we read, and from where
Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.
- Group verified
Hillcrest Children’s Services Limited
- Inspection date verified
23 Jun 2021
- Inspectors verified
Anne-Marie Davies, Peter Jackson
- Helped and protected verified
Good
- Leadership and management verified
Good
- Overall effectiveness verified
Good
- Name on report verified
1246521
- URN verified
1246521
Deep dive
What this report says
In plain English
Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.
Grade profile
Hollow rings show the previous inspection, 2019.
- OverallGood
- Helped and protectedGood
- Leadership and managementGood
70% of comparable inspections in the last three years were graded Good (12,716 inspections).
Tone of the report
How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.
In line with other reports of this type graded Good.
Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.
How the report reads, start to finish
Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.
Strengths
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
Concerns
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- However, for one child, a lack of information from the placing authority and poor emphasis within in-house placement planning mean that the child’s cultural needs have not been sufficiently considered or met. p.3
- Consequently, these complaints are not always captured, and children do not receive clear feedback on the outcomes of any concerns or complaints that they raise. p.3
Next steps
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- The registered person should ensure that children are consulted regularly on their views about the home’s care, to inform and support continued improvement in the quality of care provided. p.6
- Due consideration should be given to the child’s cognitive ability in the development and implementation of any consultation processes. p.6
- In particular, the registered person should ensure that the staff recognise and respond to the children’s complaints or concerns. p.6
- The registered person should ensure that staff hold the knowledge and skills to recognise and be alert for any signs that might indicate a child is in any way at risk of harm. p.6
- The registered person should ensure that skills in safeguarding are gained and regularly refreshed. p.6
- The registered person should ensure that care meets each child’s needs and promotes their welfare, taking into account the child’s gender, religion, ethnicity, cultural and linguistic background, sexual identity, mental health, any disability, their assessed needs, previous experiences and any relevant plans. p.6
- In particular, the children’s plans and impact risk assessments at the point of admission should take account of their ethnicity and cultural needs. p.6
What the report dwells on
Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.
Parents & families4
“Relationships with external partners and parents are very strong.” p.5Staff development3
“Supervision is regular and of high quality.” p.4SEND & inclusion2
“Staff promote an inclusive and welcoming environment.” p.3
Anatomy of the report
How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.
- Pages
- 8
- Words of findings
- 1,287
- about usual (typical 1319)
- Reading level
- Hard
- Flesch 46, typical 51
- Average sentence
- 16 words
- Next steps
- 7
- typical 4
- Hedged sentences
- 6%
- “some”, “not always”, “most”…
Where the words go
Full report text
Inspection report children’s home: 1246521 1 Registered provider: Hillcrest Children’s Services Limited Full inspection Inspected under the social care common inspection framework
p.1
Information about this children’s home
The home is run by a national private organisation. It provides care for up to 14 children across two houses. One house is for boys and girls aged between seven and 12 years, and the other is for girls aged from 12 to 18 years.
p.1
Information about this children’s home
The manager registered with Ofsted in September 2019.
p.1
Information about this children’s home
Due to COVID-19 (coronavirus), at the request of the Secretary of State, we suspended all routine inspections of social care providers on 17 March 2020.
p.1
Information about this children’s home
We last visited this setting on 9 September 2020 to carry out an assurance visit. The report is published on the Ofsted website.
p.1
Overall experiences and progress of
children and young people, taking into account
p.1
good
How well children and young people are helped and protected good
p.1
good
The effectiveness of leaders and managers good
p.1
good
The children’s home provides effective services that meet the requirements for good.
p.1
good
Overall judgement at last inspection: requires improvement to be good
p.1
good
Enforcement action since last inspection: none Inspection report children’s home: 1246521 2
p.1
Inspection date Inspection type Inspection judgement
20/08/2019 Full Requires improvement to be good 02/01/2019 Full Good 21/03/2018 Interim Sustained effectiveness 27/09/2017 Full Outstanding Inspection report children’s home: 1246521 3
p.2
Overall experiences and progress of children and young people: good
Children receive high-quality care from a committed and passionate staff team. Care planning is clear and well structured, with meaningful goals for children to work towards. Children’s plans are individually tailored to their specific needs, and staff demonstrate a well-developed understanding of each child in their care.
p.3
Overall experiences and progress of children and young people: good
Staff promote an inclusive and welcoming environment. However, for one child, a lack of information from the placing authority and poor emphasis within in-house placement planning mean that the child’s cultural needs have not been sufficiently considered or met. This lack of focus has the potential to undermine the children’s ability to develop a positive sense of self and of their cultural identity.
p.3
Overall experiences and progress of children and young people: good
Staff use a range of tools to track children’s progress. Monthly reports monitor identified targets in children’s care plans. Regular individualised newsletters, sent from each child to parents and professionals, celebrate children’s achievements. Children have recently led on the review of the rewards/incentives programme. This is well designed to ensure that all children feel valued and that their hard work is recognised.
p.3
Overall experiences and progress of children and young people: good
There has been notable progress for children since the last visit. This includes: children moving back into mainstream education settings; children being prepared for moves into fostering; children being supported to rebuild relationships with parents, with a view to reunification; and highly vulnerable children being supported to keep themselves safe from harm.
p.3
Overall experiences and progress of children and young people: good
Children are proud of their environment. They have lots of input into how their home evolves and is decorated. As a result, they really care about it. Staff provide a well-maintained and well-decorated home, which demonstrates to children that they are highly valued.
p.3
Overall experiences and progress of children and young people: good
Children participate in regular consultation about their day-to-day life at the home. They demonstrate that they feel confident they are listened to and that their views are important.
p.3
Overall experiences and progress of children and young people: good
Some children raise concerns verbally, rather than using the written complaints process that is in place. Staff do not always promptly respond to these verbal complaints. Consequently, these complaints are not always captured, and children do not receive clear feedback on the outcomes of any concerns or complaints that they raise. This current approach risks shutting down the child’s voice for those who may not be comfortable with, or able to use, the written system.
p.3
How well children and young people are helped and protected: good
Inspection report children’s home: 1246521 4 Staff demonstrate a well-developed understanding of the risks faced by children in their care. Highly vulnerable children are successfully supported to reduce risk-taking behaviours. Parents spoke of children being given space to begin to explore trauma and they work therapeutically with staff to promote change.
p.4
How well children and young people are helped and protected: good
Staff highly value the presence and input of the organisation’s clinical team. Staff benefit from a strong therapeutic ethos that informs all areas of their day-to-day practice. This enables them to understand factors that motivate risk taking and behaviours that challenge. Staff work in partnership with clinicians to formulate effective strategies that support children to manage change.
p.4
How well children and young people are helped and protected: good
Staff are proud of the atmosphere that has been created in the home. They focus on educating children to really understand the purpose of boundaries and structures. Staff said, ‘The more time spent supporting children to understand the purpose of things that happen around the house, the more children own it and want to work within set boundaries.’
p.4
How well children and young people are helped and protected: good
With a large group of children, some conflict inevitably occurs. However, the staff work proactively to address any concerns around bullying. Staff use incidents of conflict creatively as learning opportunities. Recent workshops around bullying have had a direct impact on improving the quality of relationships between children.
p.4
How well children and young people are helped and protected: good
Staff have a good understanding of their responsibilities to safeguard children. They can identify their own internal safeguarding processes and demonstrate how they fit into wider external safeguarding networks.
p.4
How well children and young people are helped and protected: good
Safeguarding is not a running agenda item at all weekly team meetings. Staff do not routinely consider different scenarios, and the desired responses to these, during staff team meetings. This means that staff may not always be encouraged, or tested, to further develop their skills and knowledge.
p.4
The effectiveness of leaders and managers: good
The organisation is planning to register the two existing homes at the site separately, with their own registered managers. This has created a challenge for the leadership team to ensure that the current registered manager maintains effective oversight of both homes in the interim. Effective use of senior leadership briefings and meetings has enabled this to happen. Communication between the two homes is good.
p.4
The effectiveness of leaders and managers: good
The registered manager is strongly committed to continuing the development of the therapeutic model of care across the homes. She supports her workforce to develop closer links with the clinical team. In doing so, she provides staff the right support to support the children they care for.
p.4
The effectiveness of leaders and managers: good
Staff describe feeling very well supported. They have a wide range of systems in place to ensure that they regularly receive feedback about their work and how they Inspection report children’s home: 1246521 5 are feeling. Supervision is regular and of high quality. Training is well maintained, despite the limitations on face-to-face training during the COVID-19 pandemic.
p.4
The effectiveness of leaders and managers: good
Staff have access to therapeutic parenting training. Reflective practice sessions take place with the clinical team. Leaders promote the model of care effectively and ensure that it is part of learning sessions at team meetings and development days.
p.5
The effectiveness of leaders and managers: good
Staff also value and benefit from lots of forums to talk with each other and their managers, for example during morning briefings, handovers and in-house workshops. The registered manager has helped to create a very reflective team of staff who are always willing to ask questions to further their understanding.
p.5
The effectiveness of leaders and managers: good
Relationships with external partners and parents are very strong. All feedback received is consistently positive. Staff have built confident relationships with social workers, which promotes dialogue and ensures that children’s best interests are always promoted. Inspection report children’s home: 1246521 6
p.5
Recommendations
The registered person should ensure that children are consulted regularly on their views about the home’s care, to inform and support continued improvement in the quality of care provided. Due consideration should be given to the child’s cognitive ability in the development and implementation of any consultation processes. In particular, the registered person should ensure that the staff recognise and respond to the children’s complaints or concerns. (‘Guide to the children’s homes regulations including the quality standards’, page 23, paragraph 4.11) The registered person should ensure that staff hold the knowledge and skills to recognise and be alert for any signs that might indicate a child is in any way at risk of harm. The registered person should ensure that skills in safeguarding are gained and regularly refreshed. In particular, the registered person should ensure that all opportunities are utilised to explore and develop the staff’s knowledge and
p.6
Recommendations
understanding of safeguarding and the expected responses to concerns. (‘Guide to the children’s homes regulations including the quality standards’, page 43, paragraph 9.12) The registered person should ensure that care meets each child’s needs and promotes their welfare, taking into account the child’s gender, religion, ethnicity, cultural and linguistic background, sexual identity, mental health, any disability, their assessed needs, previous experiences and any relevant plans. In particular, the children’s plans and impact risk assessments at the point of admission should take account of their ethnicity and cultural needs. (‘Guide to the children’s homes regulations including the quality standards’, page 14, paragraph 3.2)
p.6
Information about this inspection
Inspectors have looked closely at the experiences and progress of children and young people, using the ‘Social care common inspection framework’. This inspection was carried out under the Care Standards Act 2000 to assess the effectiveness of the service, how it meets the core functions of the service as set out in legislation, and to consider how well it complies with the Children’s Homes (England) Regulations 2015 and the ‘Guide to the children’s homes regulations including the quality standards’. Inspection report children’s home: 1246521 7
p.6
Children’s home details
Registered provider: Hillcrest Children’s Services Limited
p.7
Children’s home details
Registered provider address: Atria, Spa Road, Bolton BL1 4AG
p.7
Inspectors
Peter Jackson, Social Care Inspector Anne-Marie Davies, Social Care Inspector Inspection report children’s home: 1246521 8 to achieve excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children’s social care, and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory and Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, further education and skills, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and other secure establishments. It assesses council children’s services, and inspects services for children looked after, safeguarding and child protection.
p.7
Inspectors
If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please telephone 0300 123 1231, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk . You may reuse this information (not including logos) free of charge in any format or medium, under the terms of the Open Government Licence. To view this licence, visit www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-government-licence , write to the Information Policy Team, The National Archives, Kew, London TW9 4DU, or email: psi@nationalarchives.gsi.gov.uk .
p.8
Inspectors
Interested in our work? You can subscribe to our monthly newsletter for more information and updates: http://eepurl.com/iTrDn .
p.8
Inspectors
T: 0300 123 1231 Textphone: 0161 618 8524 E: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk W: www.gov.uk/ofsted
p.8
Discuss this inspection
Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.
Join the discussion