Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Other · Ofsted letter

Setting

Inspected 29 Jun 2021 · published 23 Jul 2021

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

Kathy Maddocks

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspection datesingle source

    29 Jun 2021

  • Inspectorssingle source

    Kathy Maddocks

  • Postcode verified

    BH11 9JJ

Page 1 of 4
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+21Mostly positivemore positive than 60% of reports of this type

In line with other reports of this type.

Praiseproudimprovingsuccessfulconfidenteffectivelyimprovedeffectivesuccessfully
Criticismpoorrequires improvementpersistently absentyet tonot effectiveexclusionsnot clearly

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsWhat needs to improve positive critical
  • Findings790w+32
  • What needs to improve220w−43

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
4
Words of findings
1,009
about usual (typical 963)
Reading level
Fairly hard
Flesch 51, typical 48
Average sentence
16 words
Next steps
8
typical 2
Hedged sentences
5%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 78%What needs to improve 22%

Full report text

Store Street Manchester M1 2WD T 0300 123 1231 www.gov.uk/ofsted

p.1

Richard Burgas Principal Oak Academy Duck Lane Bournemouth Dorset BH11 9JJ

p.1

Requires improvement: monitoring inspection visit to Oak Academy

Following my visit to your school on 29 June 2021, I write on behalf of Her Majesty’s Chief Inspector of Education, Children’s Services and Skills to confirm the monitoring inspection findings. Thank you for the help you gave during the inspection and for the time you made available to discuss the actions that have been taken to improve the school since the most recent section 5 inspection.

p.1

Requires improvement: monitoring inspection visit to Oak Academy

The monitoring inspection was carried out under section 8(2) of the Education Act 2005 and has taken place because the school has received two successive judgements of requires improvement at its previous section 5 inspections.

p.1

Requires improvement: monitoring inspection visit to Oak Academy

This was the first routine inspection the school received since the COVID-19 (coronavirus) pandemic began. I discussed the impact of the pandemic with you and have taken that into account in my evaluation.

p.1

Requires improvement: monitoring inspection visit to Oak Academy

Having considered the evidence, I am of the opinion that at this time:

p.1

Leaders and those responsible for governance are taking effective action

in order for the school to become a good school.

p.1

Context

Since the previous inspection, the leadership team has been reorganised and a new special educational needs coordinator (SENCo) has joined the school. Two new assistant vice principals have been appointed to oversee standards in key stage 3 and improve the quality of teaching and learning.

p.2

Context

The school’s governance is currently changing from an academy priority support committee to a local governing board.

p.2

Main findings

You have made the local community proud of the school. Comments from the Ofsted Parent View in March 2021, and for this inspection, confirm the support and appreciation from parents. As one parent said, ‘I can’t praise Oak enough. The support they offer the whole family, not just the pupils, is amazing.’ This is typical of many.

p.2

Main findings

At the beginning of the pandemic, you appointed additional staff to communicate between school and home, especially for those pupils who are most vulnerable. This continues today, and many more families communicate frequently with school staff. Staff are tenacious in their work with the few pupils who are still persistently absent. As a result, pupils’ attendance is improving. Year 11 pupils are no longer attending school but you have made sure that future placements for the majority are appropriate and in place.

p.2

Main findings

Since the last full inspection, you have reorganised the curriculum. There is a greater choice of subjects for pupils in key stage 4. Subject leaders ensure that pupils receive a full curriculum entitlement. They make sure that the learning within topics is in a suitable order. As a result, pupils know and remember more. However, the building of knowledge between topics is not as effective in some subjects. Leaders have yet to define clearly what the curriculum outcomes are by the end of Year 11, beyond the requirements of examination specifications.

p.2

Main findings

You have appointed a teacher to oversee reading in key stage 3. Pupils in Year 7 who enter the school without the ability to decode receive specialist teaching in phonics. This is very successful. Other key stage 3 pupils read within lessons and teachers guide them well to choose books that match their fluency in reading. You have established a new library in a spacious and comfortable setting which encourages these pupils to read at social times. As yet, pupils in key stage 4 do not receive the same support. Consequently, their vocabulary and knowledge are not enriched in the same way. The SENCo has made sure that staff know the pupils with special educational needs and/or disabilities (SEND) well. She has mapped their needs carefully. There are, now, more pupils on education, health and care plans so that staff can support their complex needs in a better way. The SENCo has arranged staff training quickly and

p.2

Main findings

efficiently. As a result, teachers and other staff are more confident in ways to adapt teaching so that these pupils can learn effectively alongside their peers.

p.3

Main findings

You have improved behaviour and reduced exclusions with effective new systems. The school has its own alternative provision for those pupils who need additional support in managing their behaviour. These pupils receive a bespoke curriculum. Several pupils have returned to the main school successfully and settled back to learning productively.

p.3

Main findings

Pupils usually engage in a range of extra-curricular activities. These help pupils build resilience, such as the Ten Tors expedition and the Duke of Edinburgh award. Others provide sporting and creative challenges. Many of these have not taken place this year because of the pandemic.

p.3

Additional support

Since the school joined the multi-academy trust in 2017, trust leaders have been very clear about the changes needed. They have provided capacity at leadership level. The trust’s director of secondary education supports senior leaders with the revamping of the curriculum and improving teaching and learning. The trust leader for SEND has worked closely with the SENCo to make sure plans develop swiftly.

p.3

Additional support

The trust’s knowledge of suitable systems is helping school staff manage poor behaviour, especially of those pupils whose behaviour is more extreme. The new behaviour management system focuses on positive rewards and acknowledgement of success. Pupils respond well to it.

p.3

Additional support

The trust has provided the funding to employ extra staff who assist with the communication to families that has been so essential during the pandemic. These staff are focusing, correctly, on pupils’ attendance and well-being.

p.3

Evidence

During the inspection, I held meetings with the principal, other senior leaders, the secondary director of education, pupils and staff, and an online meeting with the chief executive officer, the chair of trustees and another trustee, to discuss the actions taken since the last inspection.

p.3

Evidence

I looked at safeguarding, the work of pupils, visited lessons and listened to pupils read. I read responses to Ofsted’s online questionnaire, Parent View, including 72 free-text responses, and staff questionnaires. I am copying this letter to the chair of the board of trustees and the chief executive officer of Ambitions multi-academy trust, the regional schools commissioner and the director of children’s services for Bournemouth, Christchurch and Poole. This letter will be published on the Ofsted reports website.

p.3

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion