Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Other · Ofsted letter

Setting

Inspected 29 Jun 2021 · published 22 Jul 2021

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

Lydia Pride

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspection datesingle source

    29 Jun 2021

  • Inspectorssingle source

    Lydia Pride

  • Postcode verified

    TA21 8SW

Page 1 of 3
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

−11Mixedmore positive than 10% of reports of this type

Reads more critically than most reports of this type.

Praiseambitiouseffectivesupportiveconfidentrigorousimproving
Criticismnot yetrequires improvementnot alwaysyet tostrugglenot effective

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsWhat needs to improve positive critical
  • Findings690w−10
  • What needs to improve293w−11

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No standout praise found.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
3
Words of findings
978
about usual (typical 963)
Reading level
Fairly hard
Flesch 53, typical 48
Average sentence
16 words
Next steps
8
typical 2
Hedged sentences
10%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 70%What needs to improve 30%

Full report text

Store Street Manchester M1 2WD T 0300 123 1231 www.gov.uk/ofsted

p.1

Polly Matthews Headteacher Court Fields School Mantle Street Wellington Somerset TA21 8SW

p.1

Requires improvement: monitoring inspection visit to Court Fields School

Following my visit to your school on 29 June 2021, I write on behalf of Her Majesty’s Chief Inspector of Education, Children’s Services and Skills to confirm the monitoring inspection findings. Thank you for the help you gave during the inspection and for the time you made available to discuss the actions that have been taken to improve the school since the most recent section 5 inspection.

p.1

Requires improvement: monitoring inspection visit to Court Fields School

The monitoring inspection was carried out under section 8(2) of the Education Act 2005 and has taken place because the school has received two successive judgements of requires improvement at its previous section 5 inspections.

p.1

Requires improvement: monitoring inspection visit to Court Fields School

This was the first routine inspection the school received since the COVID-19 (coronavirus) pandemic began. I discussed the impact of the pandemic with you and have taken that into account in my evaluation.

p.1

Requires improvement: monitoring inspection visit to Court Fields School

Having considered the evidence, I am of the opinion that at this time:

p.1

Leaders and those responsible for governance are taking effective action

in order for the school to become a good school.

p.1

Leaders and those responsible for governance are taking effective action

The school should take further action to:

p.1

Leaders and those responsible for governance are taking effective action

 make effective use of assessment to help pupils to know and remember more of the curriculum;  adapt the curriculum for pupils with special educational needs and/or disabilities (SEND) so that they have the support they need to learn the most important concepts in each subject.

p.1

Context

Since the previous section 8 inspection, you have been confirmed in the role of permanent headteacher. In addition, several temporary postholders in your senior leadership team have been made permanent. These include the special education needs coordinator (SENCo) and the designated safeguarding lead (DSL). Three new members have joined the local governing body.

p.2

Context

At the time of this inspection, the school was holding an enrichment week. Pupils were not attending their usual lessons. Year 8 pupils were on an educational visit.

p.2

Main findings

Since your appointment, you have gained the trust of parents and the wider community. They welcome the improvements to communication that you have made. This has been especially important to them during this period of national restrictions. Parents report that your senior team is approachable and supportive. Staff confirm this. They see that leaders want to work with them to get the best outcomes for pupils.

p.2

Main findings

You consider it vital that pupils become confident readers. Approaches to teaching reading in the school in the past have not been as effective as you would like. You have arranged training for a team of staff to deliver a more rigorous curriculum for phonics. Pupils who need help with their comprehension benefit from reading sessions with a teaching assistant. These pupils now read more than they did before because they can access books which spark their interest.

p.2

Main findings

Governors are increasingly thinking about what they want pupils to know and become. Their knowledge of the curriculum in different subjects is growing. They have begun to meet with curriculum leaders to explore what pupils are learning. The chief executive officer (CEO) of the trust is actively involved in discussions about the aims of the curriculum. As a result, leaders are united around the goal of helping pupils, particularly the most vulnerable, to experience success in school and beyond.

p.2

Main findings

You and your senior team have developed considerable expertise in curriculum design. You have shared this learning with curriculum leaders. They, in turn, have developed the expertise of teachers. Subject teams are working collaboratively to identify the most important knowledge for pupils to learn. They are working productively with their counterparts in other schools within the trust on this task.

p.2

Main findings

You are building a new curriculum. You plan to implement this next term. However, you have not yet resolved how teachers will assess pupils’ learning. Currently, teachers use a range of approaches to check what pupils know. Assessment does not always focus on the most useful curriculum content because this is yet to be decided. Leaders’ understanding of how assessment helps pupils to embed knowledge is improving, but plans are at an early stage of development. The SENCo rightly focuses on making sure that pupils with SEND can learn the same ambitious curriculum as everyone else. When pupils struggle with difficult concepts, teachers respond with a range of helpful strategies. Nevertheless, curriculum leaders could do more to anticipate where some pupils with SEND might need further support to grasp an idea and reflect this in their plans. The curriculum is not yet designed to make sure that pupils with SEND gain the knowledge they

p.2

Additional support

The trust has secured the leadership capacity that the school needs to improve. Trust leaders promote a culture in which staff from different schools work together. Groups of staff hold constructive meetings to discuss the curriculum, pedagogy, SEND, and pastoral matters.

p.3

Additional support

Leaders receive useful support from the trust on safeguarding. The trust commissions an external school improvement partner who provides useful advice to the headteacher.

p.3

Evidence

During the inspection, I met with you and your senior team, including the SENCo and the DSL, the CEO of the multi-academy trust, the vice chair of the board of trustees and the chair of the local governing body to discuss the actions taken since the last inspection.

p.3

Evidence

I met with a group of subject leaders to discuss their plans for the curriculum. I held meetings with groups of pupils, with samples of their work, to discuss their experiences of the curriculum and school. I visited pupils during a reading support lesson and listened to them read. I reviewed 194 responses to Ofsted’s online survey Parent View, including 59 free-text comments, and considered 65 responses to the staff questionnaire.

p.3

Evidence

I am copying this letter to the chair of the board of trustees, and the chief executive officer of the Castle Schools Partnership multi-academy trust, the regional schools commissioner and the director of children’s services for Somerset. This letter will be published on the Ofsted reports website.

p.3

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion