Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Other · Ofsted letter

Setting

Inspected 9 Jun 2021 · published 22 Jul 2021

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

Marcus Newby

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspection datesingle source

    9 Jun 2021

  • Inspectorssingle source

    Marcus Newby

  • Postcode verified

    HD6 3JT

Page 1 of 4
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+35Mostly positivemore positive than 69% of reports of this type

In line with other reports of this type.

Praiseeagereffectivelyclearambitioushigh-qualityconfidentimprovedpositive
Criticismat riskrequires improvementnot sufficientlynot consistentlyfalling behindnot precisenot clearly

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsWhat needs to improve positive critical
  • Findings991w+30
  • What needs to improve116w+50

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No standout praise found.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
4
Words of findings
1,103
about usual (typical 963)
Reading level
Hard
Flesch 49, typical 48
Average sentence
15 words
Next steps
4
typical 2
Hedged sentences
5%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 90%What needs to improve 10%

Full report text

Store Street Manchester M1 2WD T 0300 123 1231 www.gov.uk/ofsted

p.1

Caroline Howarth Headteacher Field Lane Primary School Burnsall Road Rastrick Brighouse West Yorkshire HD6 3JT

p.1

School

Following my visit to your school on 9 June 2021, I write on behalf of Her Majesty’s Chief Inspector of Education, Children’s Services and Skills to confirm the monitoring inspection findings. Thank you for the help you gave during the inspection and for the time you made available to discuss the actions that have been taken to improve the school since the most recent section 5 inspection.

p.1

School

The monitoring inspection was carried out under section 8(2) of the Education Act 2005 and has taken place because the school has received two successive judgements of requires improvement at its previous section 5 inspections.

p.1

School

This was the first routine inspection the school received since the COVID-19 (coronavirus) pandemic began. I discussed the impact of the pandemic with you and have taken that into account in my evaluation.

p.1

School

Having considered the evidence, I am of the opinion that at this time:

p.1

Leaders and those responsible for governance are taking effective action

in order for the school to become a good school.

p.1

Leaders and those responsible for governance are taking effective action

The school should take further action to:

p.1

Leaders and those responsible for governance are taking effective action

 refine its school development plans to include precise and clear actions  maintain staff training in delivering systematic synthetic phonics so that all pupils can get off to a prompt start and sustain their progress in being confident readers.

p.1

Context

Shortly after the previous section 5 inspection, the previous headteacher left the school. You became the substantive headteacher in January 2020, having moved from within the Brighter Futures multi-academy trust. Two governors have recently joined the governing body. In the near future, it is expected that the school will transition to become part of a newly formed multi-academy trust.

p.2

Main findings

Leaders have been focused. You have a clear vision and are determined that all pupils, despite any adversity, can succeed. Leaders have prioritised the areas for improvement from the previous section 5 inspection. They have correctly undertaken other areas of work, including a review of governance and the development of leaders at all levels. Training has been a priority for all staff. This, and the vision of leaders, has moved the school forward. However, leaders’ action plans, including those relating to leadership and management, are not sufficiently precise. These need to be refined to match your ambitious plans.

p.2

Main findings

Governance has improved. Governors now ensure that there is no complacency. They are consistent in their questioning to check leaders’ assertions. One governor said, ‘We don’t make assumptions, we seek assurances; if in doubt, we seek alternative evidence.’ Governors are eager to have this scrutiny recorded in their records of meetings. Governors receive regular information from leaders in school. At times, this is ambiguous. Leaders’ information for governors is not consistently plain and clearly understood. However, leaders have taken recent steps to improve the clarity and accessibility of their reports for governors. This is starting to make a positive difference.

p.2

Main findings

There is every intention to inspire a lifelong love of reading among pupils. You have invested heavily in a range of new reading materials, including some phonetically decodable books. You have also purchased books to enhance the curriculum and to improve pupils’ exposure to high-quality texts. Staff set aside extra time to help pupils at risk of falling behind in their reading. Pupils read books that are matched to their phonics knowledge. Leaders check regularly to assure themselves of this match. Development planning for improving the teaching of phonics and early reading, however, is currently too vague. It is being reworked with the support of a local multi-academy trust to match the needs of Field Lane Primary School.

p.2

Main findings

Most staff who teach early reading and phonics have the expertise and knowledge required to do so effectively. Ongoing professional development and coaching feature regularly. A minority of staff have not had the opportunity to train on the school’s approach to the systematic teaching of synthetic phonics. Leaders are in the process of making sure all teaching staff are trained. This will ensure that all pupils receive the same experience in terms of quality. Teachers plan for the next steps in pupils’ learning at the end of each lesson. Pupils understand these systems and respond well. For instance, pupils read their teachers’ comments and make changes where appropriate. This carefully considered feedback helps pupils to develop their learning. Pupils with special educational needs and/or disabilities are well supported. Staff know pupils’ needs and guide them effectively.

p.2

Main findings

You commissioned external partners to carry out a behaviour audit. These inspectors noticed a calm and nurturing atmosphere around the school. Pupils are polite to adults; they interact well with one another and show respect. There is a clear and effective behaviour strategy. Pupils value rewards. They are eager to earn points and have plans to ‘spend’ these on both material and non-material items. For instance, one pupil told inspectors that he was saving points to become a teaching assistant for the day. Pupils behave well in school. This is evident in lessons, in the dining room and on the playing field during breaktimes.

p.3

Additional support

The trust has brokered a range of support for leaders. This includes support from the school improvement services of the local authority. The school will become a member of the Polaris multi-academy trust in the near future. Partners from this trust are currently supporting the school in developing leaders at all levels.

p.3

Additional support

External support is well received, and leaders are open to additional challenge in developing the school. Support is carefully coordinated and used judiciously. This helps to ensure that the support is impactful and fit for purpose.

p.3

Evidence

During the inspection, I held meetings with the headteacher, the deputy headteacher, the executive headteacher, the chief executive officer of Polaris multi- academy trust, representatives of those responsible for governance and a representative of the local authority. In these meetings, we discussed the actions taken since the last inspection.

p.3

Evidence

Together, we visited lessons. I met with you in your role as special educational needs and/or disabilities coordinator, listened to pupils read with familiar adults and observed pupils’ interaction at social times. I also looked at documents, such as the minutes of governors’ meetings, a summary of your self-evaluation document and the school’s development plan. Together with the chief operations officer, I looked at the schools’ single central register.

p.3

Evidence

I am copying this letter to the chair of the governing body, the chair of the board of trustees, the chief executive officer or equivalent of the Brighter Futures multi- academy trust, the regional schools commissioner and the director of children’s services for Calderdale. This letter will be published on the Ofsted reports website. Yours sincerely

p.3

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion