Other · Ofsted letter
Setting
Summary
What we read, and from where
Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.
- Inspection datesingle source
8 Jun 2021
- Inspectorssingle source
Fyfe Johnston
- Postcode verified
PE13 2ES
Deep dive
What this report says
In plain English
Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.
Tone of the report
How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.
In line with other reports of this type.
How the report reads, start to finish
Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.
Strengths
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
No standout praise found.
Concerns
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
No strong criticism found.
Next steps
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- Since the previous inspection, there have been changes to teaching staff. p.2
- Many subjects in the curriculum have new subject leaders. p.2
- The chair of governors took up their role in July 2020. p.2
- Currently, the school is seeking to appoint two further governors. p.2
- Following the previous inspection, the Diocese of Ely multi-academy trust (the trust) has appointed new specialist advisers to increase their support for school improvement. p.2
What the report dwells on
Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.
Anatomy of the report
How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.
- Pages
- 3
- Words of findings
- 854
- about usual (typical 963)
- Reading level
- Hard
- Flesch 47, typical 48
- Average sentence
- 17 words
- Next steps
- 5
- typical 2
- Hedged sentences
- 4%
- “some”, “not always”, “most”…
Where the words go
Full report text
Store Street Manchester M1 2WD T 0300 123 1231 www.gov.uk/ofsted
p.1
Amy Harvey Headteacher St Peter’s C of E Aided Junior School Trafford Road Wisbech Cambridgeshire PE13 2ES
p.1
Aided Junior School
Following my visit to your school on 8 June 2021, I write on behalf of Her Majesty’s Chief Inspector of Education, Children’s Services and Skills to confirm the monitoring inspection findings. Thank you for the help you gave during the inspection and for the time you made available to discuss the actions that have been taken to improve the school since the most recent section 5 inspection.
p.1
Aided Junior School
The monitoring inspection was carried out under section 8(2) of the Education Act 2005 and has taken place because the school has received two successive judgements of requires improvement at its previous section 5 inspections.
p.1
Aided Junior School
This was the first routine inspection the school received since the COVID-19 (coronavirus) pandemic began. I discussed the impact of the pandemic with you and have taken that into account in my evaluation.
p.1
Aided Junior School
Having considered the evidence, I am of the opinion that at this time:
p.1
Leaders and those responsible for governance are taking effective action
in order for the school to become a good school.
p.1
Leaders and those responsible for governance are taking effective action
The school should take further action to ensure that:
p.1
Leaders and those responsible for governance are taking effective action
teachers have had the training they need to implement the revised curriculum leaders check how the changes to the curriculum are improving the quality of education for pupils at the school.
p.1
Context
Since the previous inspection, there have been changes to teaching staff. Many subjects in the curriculum have new subject leaders. The chair of governors took up their role in July 2020. Currently, the school is seeking to appoint two further governors. Following the previous inspection, the Diocese of Ely multi-academy trust (the trust) has appointed new specialist advisers to increase their support for school improvement.
p.2
Main findings
Following the previous inspection, leaders and the trust are quickly taking the actions needed to improve the school. Leaders have reviewed the English and mathematics curriculums. New schemes of learning have been adapted for some other subjects across the curriculum. However, work on implementing the new plans in all subjects and ensuring that teachers are trained to deliver it effectively in all subjects has been delayed by the pandemic.
p.2
Main findings
Subject leaders have been involved in the development of their curriculum areas. Teachers welcome and appreciate the increased support and training that subject leaders provide. Where new curriculum plans are in place, pupils increase their subject knowledge, building on what they have learned previously. For example, in design technology, pupils are able to discuss the design process and talk knowledgeably about how they are developing a prototype. Pupils are able to confidently evaluate the design process they have gone through.
p.2
Main findings
Leaders have reviewed how phonics is taught at the school. Teachers are trained to support pupils who speak English as an additional language and pupils with special educational needs and/or disabilities in developing their early reading skills quickly. Pupils read a range of age-appropriate books to practise their phonic knowledge. Pupils are well supported in becoming fluent readers at whatever age they join the school.
p.2
Main findings
Reading is a priority. Pupils read in class regularly. Leaders have carefully selected the books pupils read. For example, pupils shared how much they had enjoyed ‘The River Runs Gold’ and how they have linked this story to their current whole-class book. The regular opportunities to read a variety of texts is contributing towards pupils developing a love of reading.
p.2
Main findings
Teachers feel supported by leaders and say that their workload is carefully managed. Leaders are continuing to provide training to ensure that teachers are prepared to implement the full curriculum in September 2021. Leaders have begun to check how well teachers are implementing the planned, new curriculum. However, this work has only recently restarted due to the pandemic and leaders are not currently sure what difference the new curriculum has made to pupils’ achievement in all subjects.
p.2
Additional support
Leaders continue to receive support from the trust. The trust’s specialist advisers have provided appropriate challenge to the decisions leaders have taken to improve the curriculum across all subjects.
p.3
Additional support
Leaders have sought external support when introducing and adapting new schemes of learning for curriculum subjects. Staff have received training. This has ensured that expectations for the curriculum are being put in place and that staff are being equipped to teach every subject effectively.
p.3
Evidence
During the inspection, I held meetings with the headteacher, other senior leaders, the trust’s chief executive officer, specialist advisers, pupils, staff and representatives of those responsible for governance to discuss the actions taken since the last inspection.
p.3
Evidence
I visited lessons and looked at pupils’ work. I reviewed the school’s self-evaluation plan, minutes of the governors’ meetings, leaders’ internal monitoring documents and other documentary evidence provided by the school. I analysed 36 responses to Ofsted’s online questionnaire, Parent View, including 34 free-text responses, and 27 staff questionnaires.
p.3
Evidence
I am copying this letter to the chair of the governing body, the chief executive officer of the Diocese of Ely multi-academy trust, the director of education for the Diocese of Ely, the regional schools commissioner and the director of children’s services for Cambridgeshire. This letter will be published on the Ofsted reports website.
p.3
Discuss this inspection
Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.
Join the discussion