Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Other · Ofsted letter

Setting

Inspected 15 Jun 2021 · published 19 Jul 2021

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

Jonathan Keay

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspection datesingle source

    15 Jun 2021

  • Inspectorssingle source

    Jonathan Keay

  • Postcode verified

    B34 6NB

Page 1 of 5
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+40Positivemore positive than 72% of reports of this type

In line with other reports of this type.

Praiseambitiousprecisesuccessfullyeffectivesecuretimelyclearsafe
Criticismrequires improvementdisruption

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsWhat needs to improve positive critical
  • Findings1139w+24
  • What needs to improve179w+62

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No standout praise found.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No strong criticism found.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
5
Words of findings
1,313
longer than usual (typical 963)
Reading level
Fairly hard
Flesch 53, typical 48
Average sentence
16 words
Next steps
6
typical 2
Hedged sentences
10%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 86%What needs to improve 14%

Full report text

Store Street Manchester M1 2WD T 0300 123 1231 www.gov.uk/ofsted

p.1

Pete Higgins Heathlands Primary Academy Heath Way Castle Bromwich Birmingham West Midlands B34 6NB

p.1

Academy

Following my visit to your school on 15 June 2021 with Heather Fearn, Her Majesty’s Inspector (HMI), I write on behalf of Her Majesty's Chief Inspector of Education, Children's Services and Skills to confirm the monitoring inspection findings. Thank you for the help you gave during the inspection and for the time you made available to discuss the actions that have been taken to improve the school since the most recent section 5 inspection.

p.1

Academy

The monitoring inspection was carried out under section 8(2) of the Education Act 2005 and has taken place because the school has received two successive judgements of requires improvement at its previous section 5 inspections.

p.1

Academy

This was the first routine inspection the school received since the 2020-21 COVID- 19 (coronavirus) pandemic. I discussed the impact of the pandemic with the school and have taken that into account in my evaluation.

p.1

Academy

Having considered the evidence, I am of the opinion that at this time:

p.1

Leaders and those responsible for governance are taking effective action

in order for the school to become a good school.

p.1

Leaders and those responsible for governance are taking effective action

The school should take further action to:

p.1

Leaders and those responsible for governance are taking effective action

 refine curriculum content so that the precise knowledge that staff want pupils to learn is set out with clarity and coherence from early years to Year 6

p.1

PROTECT-INSPECTION

 ensure curriculum improvement plans take account of early years and recognise it as the start of the curriculum  provide staff with further support to enhance their subject knowledge  promote a culture of reading for pleasure by ensuring the novels and texts that pupils read are suitably ambitious.

p.2

Context

The school’s leadership and staff remain largely unchanged since the last section 5 inspection.

p.2

Context

Since Ofsted’s last monitoring visit, staff have successfully welcomed pupils back to school. Staff have carefully assessed pupils’ needs and established any necessary additional support. Leaders report that most pupils have managed the transition back to learning at school well.

p.2

Context

At the time of the inspection, no pupils were isolating or being educated remotely. Pupils’ attendance has returned to the levels that the school was recording prior to the pandemic.

p.2

Main findings

Since the last section 5 inspection, leaders have worked with colleagues across the University of Wolverhampton multi-academy trust (UWMAT), to strengthen the curriculum in all subjects. They have focused on giving greater prominence to the wider curriculum. Subject leaders have received training and support from networks across the trust. This is helping them consider what knowledge they want pupils to learn and remember.

p.2

Main findings

This work marks an important step for the school. Subjects like history, geography, and physical education (PE) now have a higher profile. Teachers have been given time to think much more carefully about what they teach and why. However, leaders recognise that there is further work to do. Some plans are complex and detailed. This detail makes it hard to appreciate what content is most important and must be remembered by pupils for future learning. When leaders have further clarified the precise knowledge that they want pupils to know and remember, they will be better placed to consider how this is assessed.

p.2

Main findings

Subject leaders and staff require additional support to secure further curriculum improvements. COVID-19 has hampered some of the support for staff that had been planned for the last year. UWMAT now have plans in place to begin a new wave of staff training before the end of the summer term. Senior leaders have arranged for subject leaders to meet with other colleagues across the trust. While

p.2

PROTECT-INSPECTION

this support is timely, leaders recognise that adequate specialist advice will also need to be on hand. Some subject leaders are either new to post or are leading areas that they do not have a significant background in.

p.3

PROTECT-INSPECTION

The school’s early years team has a clear vision for the curriculum they are building for the youngest learners in the school. Staff have worked with teachers in Year 1 to think carefully about the curriculum. They have plotted the knowledge that children will first learn in early years and build upon in key stage 1. Some of this work has been interrupted by COVID-19 but is well underway. The early years leader recognises Nursery and Reception as the bedrock of everything to come. Staff have adopted a sensible approach to assessment and are focused on creating as much time as possible for teaching. However, school improvement plans do not fully reflect these early years ambitions. Without identifying this work within improvement plans, leaders will not be able to fully check the impact of their actions.

p.3

PROTECT-INSPECTION

The teaching of early reading is effective. The school has a well-established programme for teaching phonics. All staff are trained and receive expert support from the school’s reading leader. The weakest readers are carefully monitored. Teachers were able to continue teaching phonics throughout the last period of remote learning. Pupils read books that are matched to the sounds they are learning. However, some of the texts selected by pupils and included within the school’s English lessons, could be even more ambitious.

p.3

PROTECT-INSPECTION

Staff have established a system to ensure that any vulnerable pupils are quickly identified. Leaders work closely with external agencies to make sure that pupils get any help that they need. This help has included supporting families manage the challenges of the last year.

p.3

PROTECT-INSPECTION

The school’s leaders are receptive and hard working. Staff who responded to our questionnaire say that pupils are safe in school. Similarly, all staff feel that the school has a culture that encourages calm and orderly conduct and is aspirational for all pupils.

p.3

PROTECT-INSPECTION

The school has devised new plans to respond to the disruption caused by COVID- 19. These plans include prioritising elements of English and mathematics. Plans are detailed and include relevant actions and outcomes for each class. The school’s wider plans are also appropriate. However, leaders know that the further development of the wider curriculum is now a key priority. The development of subjects should also take full account of how learning starts in the early years.

p.3

Additional support

UWMAT has established a programme of support for leaders (including subject leaders). This is helping them to develop in their roles. This work has been a priority and has progressed despite the challenges of the last year. However, elements of the support, like establishing subject networks and securing specialist support, now have scope to go further.

p.4

Additional support

Governors understand the priorities that have been identified for improving the quality of education. They have attended additional training and identified someone with responsibility for curriculum. Governors continued to meet remotely throughout the lockdowns. They are keen to take the next steps with the curriculum and are considering how they can make further use of the subject expertise within the trust.

p.4

Additional support

Leaders are pleased with the impact that external support is having upon their improvement work. They have requested support from other local leaders to help them monitor the impact of their actions on the curriculum and other key areas.

p.4

Evidence

During the inspection, meetings were held with the headteacher and other senior leaders, the executive headteacher and chief executive officer of UWMAT, the school business manager, pupils from a range of year groups, and representatives of those responsible for governance to discuss the actions taken since the last inspection.

p.4

Evidence

We also met with subject leaders, the early years leader and English leader, took account of pupils’ work and visited lessons. We reviewed the school’s single central register and considered systems and processes for managing safeguarding with one of the school’s designated safeguarding leads and the head of pastoral care. We took account of responses to Ofsted’s online questionnaire, Ofsted Parent View, including 14 free-text responses, and 24 staff questionnaires.

p.4

Evidence

I am copying this letter to the chief executive officer of UWMAT, the regional schools commissioner and the director of children's services for Birmingham. This letter will be published on the Ofsted reports website.

p.4

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion