Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Social care · Children's home inspection (SCCIF)

Children's Home run by Bay Tree House (Gravesend) Limited in Kent

Inspected 19 May 2021 · published 16 Jul 2021 · URN 1244108

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Group verified

    Bay Tree House (Gravesend) Limited

  • Inspection date verified

    19 May 2021

  • Inspectors verified

    Mark Newington

  • Helped and protected verified

    Good

  • Leadership and management verified

    Good

  • Overall effectiveness verified

    Good

  • Name on report verified

    1244108

  • URN verified

    1244108

Page 1 of 9
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Grade profile

Hollow rings show the previous inspection, 2019.

  • OverallGood
  • Helped and protectedGood
  • Leadership and managementGood

70% of comparable inspections in the last three years were graded Good (12,716 inspections).

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+53Positivemore positive than 68% of reports of this type graded Good
OutstandingGoodRIInadequate

In line with other reports of this type graded Good.

Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.

Praiseclearwell plannedstronglystronggood progresseffectiveskilledhappy
Criticismseriousnot consistentlylimitedmissednot clearly

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsAbout the inspectionWhat needs to improve positive critical
  • Findings1105w+69
  • What needs to improve297w−64

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No strong criticism found.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
9
Words of findings
1,388
about usual (typical 1319)
Reading level
Hard
Flesch 50, typical 51
Average sentence
17 words
Next steps
5
typical 4
Hedged sentences
0%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 62%What needs to improve 17%About the inspection 21%

Full report text

Inspection report children’s home: 1244108 1 Registered provider: Bay Tree House (Gravesend) Limited Full inspection Inspected under the social care common inspection framework

p.1

Information about this children’s home

This privately owned home provides care for up to three children. The home’s statement of purpose states that it provides holistic and therapeutic care for children with learning needs, language and communication difficulties and/or autism spectrum disorders.

p.1

Information about this children’s home

The manager was registered with Ofsted in October 2019.

p.1

Information about this children’s home

Due to COVID-19, at the request of the Secretary of State, we suspended all routine inspections of social care providers on 17 March 2020.

p.1

Information about this children’s home

We last visited this setting 10 February 2021 to carry out a monitoring visit. The report is published on our website.

p.1

Overall experiences and progress of

children and young people, taking into account

p.1

good

How well children and young people are helped and protected good

p.1

good

The effectiveness of leaders and managers good

p.1

good

The children’s home provides effective services that meet the requirements for good.

p.1

good

Overall judgement at last inspection: Good

p.1

good

Enforcement action since last inspection: None Inspection report children’s home: 1244108 2

p.1

Inspection date Inspection type Inspection judgement

12/06/2019 Full Good 15/11/2018 Full Good Inspection report children’s home: 1244108 3

p.2

Overall experiences and progress of children and young people: good

The quality of care provided to children in this home is of a high standard. Children are cared for by a skilled and passionate staff team who has a good understanding of children’s needs.

p.3

Overall experiences and progress of children and young people: good

Each child has a good-quality individualised care plan that considers their needs and how best to support them. Weekly and monthly analysis is carried out by key workers to ensure that the plans are progressed. Reviews are shared with children’s social workers, providing a shared understanding of children’s progress and helping to identify further targets.

p.3

Overall experiences and progress of children and young people: good

Children are happy in the home. They are regularly consulted about how it feels to live there. There are a variety of different activities made available to the children based on their requests. As well as local activities and clubs, the children enjoy larger trips to theme parks.

p.3

Overall experiences and progress of children and young people: good

Children’s views are paramount in all decisions made both about the home and their individual care. There are regular one-to-one sessions, house meetings and well- being surveys to ensure that children’s views are continually considered. As a result, children feel their views are valued, and staff have a good understanding of how children experience care in the home.

p.3

Overall experiences and progress of children and young people: good

Plans for children’s independence are supplemented by the use of a national qualification-awarding system. This allows children to get academic based qualifications and training to learn life skills for the future. Staff support the individual learning activities which are done with children each day.

p.3

Overall experiences and progress of children and young people: good

Staff skilfully and sensitively help children to understand individual differences and identity, both in relation to themselves and wider society. Staff ensure that all significant work done with children is also documented in a way that they can understand by often using visual symbols as well as written words.

p.3

How well children and young people are helped and protected: good

Safeguarding systems are, generally, strong. Staff have a clear understanding of risks to children. Assessments identify children’s individual areas of vulnerability. These are reviewed both periodically and following any significant incidents. However, there has been an incident of a child misusing social media that did not prompt a review of their risk assessment. Managers did not ensure that up-to-date guidance was available to staff, and the child was potentially vulnerable as a result.

p.3

How well children and young people are helped and protected: good

Missing episodes are infrequent. Children who go missing from the home are well supported upon their return. Risk assessments set out clearly the action that needs to be taken, and records show an understanding of what may have been the child’s Inspection report children’s home: 1244108 4 motivation for being missing from the home. Staff advocate strongly to ensure that following a period of going missing, children are offered a return home interview. They undertake one-to-one sessions with children to reflect on what has happened, helping children to make safer choices and to reduce the potential for further missing episodes.

p.3

How well children and young people are helped and protected: good

Incidents are well managed in the home with minimal use of restraint. Managers ensure that there is a clear process for reflection by staff and children. Records of incidents are, generally, well written. However, in the one incident of restraint, the report lacked a clear description of the actions taken by staff in relation to the type or length of time of the restraint. This limits opportunities for staff and managers to learn from these incidents to avoid similar incidents reoccurring.

p.4

How well children and young people are helped and protected: good

Managers have not consistently notified Ofsted of a number of significant incidents in the home, including missing episodes. This means Ofsted has not been made aware of potential safeguarding issues in the home. This issue was also identified at the last inspection and is, therefore, a repeat requirement.

p.4

How well children and young people are helped and protected: good

Recruitment of new staff is well planned, and rigorous checks are undertaken to ensure that people are suitable to work with children and are compatible with the existing staff team. Although the registered manager makes appropriate checks and challenges, their rationale for appointing staff is not clearly recorded.

p.4

How well children and young people are helped and protected: good

Health and safety checks in the home are well managed. Fire drills are carried out monthly, and a schedule of repairs ensures that the home is well maintained. All children in the home are involved in the regular safety tests, and they are supported to understand what to do in the event an evacuation is required.

p.4

The effectiveness of leaders and managers: good

Leaders and managers have a clear vision for the home, and they are aspirational for children. Staff talk positively about the support that is available from the management team, and there is a clear sense of being ‘in it together’. This culture is promoted by the clear direction and support provided to staff by the management team.

p.4

The effectiveness of leaders and managers: good

All staff share a genuine passion for achieving the best for children. Staff are held in high regard by professionals for the supportive role that they play in children’s lives. Significant decisions are made in agreement with family members. Staff are active within the professional network and ensure that their in-depth understanding of the children’s needs is used to inform care planning.

p.4

The effectiveness of leaders and managers: good

Managers advocate strongly for children. When children’s needs are not being sufficiently met, managers are persistent and successful in securing the services that children need. This has had a positive impact on improving children’s circumstances.

p.4

The effectiveness of leaders and managers: good

Managers actively monitor the quality of care that is provided by staff. There is a thorough system of review and analysis of practice that supports children to make Inspection report children’s home: 1244108 5 good progress.

p.4

The effectiveness of leaders and managers: good

Staff are supported by frequent good-quality supervision. This is well planned and helps staff to develop while also being clear about expectations for staff moving forward. Leaders help staff to reflect on their practice and to identify changes that they can implement to improve their responses to children’s changing behaviour.

p.5

The effectiveness of leaders and managers: good

Leaders and managers have worked hard to construct a specific training plan for the staff team. There is a regular review of their skills, and this is reflected in individual training plans. However, these reviews have not been used to produce a workforce development plan. This is a missed opportunity to give better strategic oversight of the team’s training needs in relation to service development. This is a repeated recommendation from the previous monitoring visit. Inspection report children’s home: 1244108 6

p.5

Statutory requirements

This section sets out the actions that the registered person(s) must take to meet the Care Standards Act 2000, Children’s Homes (England) Regulations 2015 and the ‘Guide to the children’s homes regulations including the quality standards’. The registered person(s) must comply within the given timescales.

p.6

Requirement Due date

The registered person must notify HMCI and each other relevant person without delay if—

p.6

Requirement Due date

there is any other incident relating to a child which the registered person considers to be serious.

p.6

Requirement Due date

within 24 hours of the use of a measure of control, discipline or restraint in relation to a child in the home, a record is made which includes—

p.6

Requirement Due date

details of any methods used or steps taken to avoid the need to use the measure;

p.6

Requirement Due date

the effectiveness and any consequences of the use of the measure.

p.6

Requirement Due date

This refers specifically to the description of techniques that have been used by staff to restrain children. 31 July 2021

p.6

Requirement Due date

The leadership and management standard is that the registered person enables, inspires and leads a culture in relation to the children’s home that—

p.6

Requirement Due date

helps children aspire to fulfil their potential; and

p.6

Requirement Due date

In particular, the standard in paragraph (1) requires the registered person to—

p.6

Requirement Due date

use monitoring and review systems to make continuous improvements in the quality of care provided in the home. 31 July 2021 Inspection report children’s home: 1244108 7 (Regulation 13 (1)(a)(b) (2)(h))

p.6

Requirement Due date

This particularly refers to management oversight of risk assessments and making changes when necessary.

p.7

Recommendations

 The registered person should ensure there is a suitable workforce plan in place that links to regulation 16, schedule 1 (‘Guide to the children’s homes regulations including the quality standards’, page 53, paragraph 10.8)  The registered manager must maintain good employment practice (‘Guide to the children’s homes regulations including the quality standards’, page 61, paragraph 13.1)

p.7

Information about this inspection

Inspectors have looked closely at the experiences and progress of children and young people, using the ‘Social care common inspection framework’. This inspection was carried out under the Care Standards Act 2000 to assess the effectiveness of the service, how it meets the core functions of the service as set out in legislation, and to consider how well it complies with the Children’s Homes (England) Regulations 2015 and the ‘Guide to the children’s homes regulations including the quality standards’. Inspection report children’s home: 1244108 8

p.7

Children’s home details

Registered provider: Bay Tree House (Gravesend) Limited

p.8

Inspector

Mark Newington, Social Care Inspector Inspection report children’s home: 1244108 9 to achieve excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children’s social care, and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory and Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, further education and skills, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and other secure establishments. It assesses council children’s services, and inspects services for children looked after, safeguarding and child protection.

p.8

Inspector

If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please telephone 0300 123 1231, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk . You may reuse this information (not including logos) free of charge in any format or medium, under the terms of the Open Government Licence. To view this licence, visit www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-government-licence , write to the Information Policy Team, The National Archives, Kew, London TW9 4DU, or email: psi@nationalarchives.gsi.gov.uk .

p.9

Inspector

Interested in our work? You can subscribe to our monthly newsletter for more information and updates: http://eepurl.com/iTrDn .

p.9

Inspector

T: 0300 123 1231 Textphone: 0161 618 8524 E: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk W: www.gov.uk/ofsted

p.9

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion