Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Other · Ofsted letter

Setting

Inspected 24 Jun 2021 · published 16 Jul 2021

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

Matthew Knox

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspection datesingle source

    24 Jun 2021

  • Inspectorssingle source

    Matthew Knox

  • Postcode verified

    DN4 0HH

Page 1 of 4
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+17Mostly positivemore positive than 58% of reports of this type

In line with other reports of this type.

Praiseenjoystrongimprovingcleareffectivelysuccessfulaccurately
Criticismrequires improvementfalling behindfall behindtoo manynot precise

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsWhat needs to improve positive critical
  • Findings978w+17
  • What needs to improve64w0

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No standout praise found.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No strong criticism found.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
4
Words of findings
1,039
about usual (typical 963)
Reading level
Plain English
Flesch 64, typical 48
Average sentence
14 words
Next steps
4
typical 2
Hedged sentences
7%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 94%What needs to improve 6%

Full report text

Store Street Manchester M1 2WD T 0300 123 1231 www.gov.uk/ofsted

p.1

Mrs Jeni Harrison Hexthorpe Primary School Urban Road Hexthorpe Doncaster South Yorkshire DN4 0HH

p.1

School

Following my visit to your school on 24 June 2021, I write on behalf of Her Majesty’s Chief Inspector of Education, Children’s Services and Skills to confirm the monitoring inspection findings. Thank you for the help you gave during the inspection and for the time you made available to discuss the actions that have been taken to improve the school since the most recent section 5 inspection.

p.1

School

The monitoring inspection was carried out under section 8(2) of the Education Act 2005 and has taken place because the school has received two successive judgements of requires improvement at its previous section 5 inspections.

p.1

School

This was the first routine inspection the school received since the COVID-19 (coronavirus) pandemic began. I discussed the impact of the pandemic with you and have taken that into account in my evaluation.

p.1

School

Having considered the evidence, I am of the opinion that at this time:

p.1

Leaders and those responsible for governance are taking effective action

in order for the school to become a good school.

p.1

Context

Since the last inspection in January 2020, the previous principal has left the school. You have been appointed to the role of interim principal. Two new assistant principals have joined the school. There is a new mathematics leader. There is a new chair of the transition management board (the body responsible for local governance).

p.1

Main findings

Since your appointment, you have taken swift action to improve the quality of education. You have focused your actions on the right priorities. You know that the curriculum needs improving. All leaders are completing tasks that help with this aim. Staff understand what is expected of them and are on board with what needs to be done.

p.2

Main findings

All subjects now have curriculum plans that match the expectations of the national curriculum. Through the school’s curriculum, you want pupils to have experiences that will raise their aspirations of what they can achieve. You recognise that subject plans did not previously define the knowledge pupils needed to learn. You have started to address this. You are adding more detail to curriculum plans about what pupils will learn and at what point.

p.2

Main findings

You have identified that some curriculum plans are better developed than others. For example, in science, it is clear what pupils will learn and when. Teachers build on the knowledge that pupils have learned in the past. Leaders have linked scientific themes together so that pupils revisit what they have been taught previously. This means that pupils are starting to remember more. Other subjects do not have plans which are as knowledge-based. You recognise that this needs to change. You know how and when you will improve plans in other subjects.

p.2

Main findings

Teachers are starting to understand how to check what pupils know and can do. Leaders know that teachers can only assess pupils effectively on what they have learned. Leaders have written guidance for teachers on how to assess pupils. Subject leaders have also trained teachers on how to use quick questions to see how much pupils have remembered. Teachers use these methods to understand what pupils have remembered. Teachers adapt what they teach in response to this. These methods of assessment are stronger in subjects with more developed curriculum plans.

p.2

Main findings

Teachers make sure that they revisit learning that pupils have done in the past. For example, in mathematics, pupils practise counting on in twos before learning how to solve problems where they need to divide by two. These methods of revisiting mean that pupils are more successful in gaining new knowledge. Again, teachers do this best in subjects where curriculum plans are most developed.

p.2

Main findings

Pupils did not get off to a strong start in reading in the past. Phonics lessons were not well taught. Pupils were falling behind where they needed to be. Their catch-up sessions were not helping them. You have made sure that all staff are now trained in your phonics programme. Teachers are clear about which sounds pupils will learn and in what order. Pupils are assessed accurately. If pupils fall behind, they receive one-to-one support. This means that more of them are now catching up.

p.2

Main findings

You want pupils to enjoy the books that they read. Pupils have helped to reorganise the school’s library. You have made sure that classrooms have books for pupils to enjoy. Teachers now teach pupils how to improve their fluency. Some pupils talked about how much they enjoy reading their books. However, too many older pupils still need support with reading as they have not kept up in the past. Leaders know that the reading curriculum for pupils in key stage 2 is not precise enough to ensure that pupils catch up and keep up. They have plans to address this

p.3

Main findings

The transition management board know the priorities for the school. They visit often. They ask leaders about the quality of education in the school. Members of the board then check that leaders are carrying out the actions that they said that they would. They challenge you to make sure that this is happening. These actions have increased the pace of improvement.

p.3

Additional support

Leaders from the multi-academy trust are using their expertise to support you. They have spent time with you on improving the curriculum plans. They have helped subject leaders make links with leaders in other schools. This has aided these subject leaders in designing their curriculum plans.

p.3

Evidence

During the inspection, I held meetings with the interim principal and other senior leaders, members of the transition management board and directors of the multi- academy trust to discuss the actions taken since the last inspection.

p.3

Evidence

I also met with subject leaders for reading, mathematics, science, and art and design to discuss their curriculum plans. I visited two mathematics lessons. I talked with pupils about their learning and listened to some pupils read to a familiar adult.

p.3

Evidence

I also considered responses to Ofsted’s online questionnaire, Parent View, including 57 free-text responses, and 44 staff questionnaires. I am copying this letter to the chair of the board of trustees and the chief executive officer of the Astrea multi-academy trust, the regional schools commissioner and the director of children’s services for Doncaster. This letter will be published on the Ofsted reports website.

p.3

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion