Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Other · Ofsted report

The National Mathematics and Physics SCITT

Inspected 27 May 2021 · published 15 Jul 2021 · URN 1272920

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

Matthew Newberry (lead), Gary Holden, Paul Metcalf

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspection date verified

    27 May 2021

  • Inspectors verified

    Gary Holden, Matthew Newberry, Paul Metcalf

  • Postcode verified

    HP11 1TB

  • Name on report verified

    The National Mathematics and Physics SCITT

  • URN verified

    1272920

Page 1 of 7
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+28Mostly positivemore positive than 39% of reports of this type

In line with other reports of this type.

Praisehigh-qualityambitiousstrongwell supportedsecure knowledgeenthusiasmskilledrobust
Criticismdelayedinconsistenciesnot consistentlylimitednot secure

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsAbout the inspection positive critical

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No standout praise found.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No strong criticism found.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Full report text

The National Mathematics and Physics SCITT Wycombe High School Academies Trust, Marlow Road, High Wycombe HP11 1TB

p.1

Overall effectiveness Good

The quality of education and training Good

p.1

Overall effectiveness Good

Overall effectiveness at previous inspection Not applicable

p.1

What is it like to be a trainee at this ITE partnership?

Trainees are attracted to the National Mathematics and Physics SCITT (NMAPS) by the high-quality, subject-specialist training and research-informed learning. Typically, they have already achieved high levels of academic success in either mathematics or physics and are a mix of recent graduates, career changers and those who have worked in schools.

p.1

What is it like to be a trainee at this ITE partnership?

Trainees value how well subject leaders and mentors within their regional hub know them as individuals. They feel particularly well supported to understand the pedagogy and practice required to teach their subject. Trainees also benefit from national training days and professional networking opportunities which help deepen their subject knowledge. They appreciate how leaders support their well-being and longer-term career aims.

p.1

What is it like to be a trainee at this ITE partnership?

Some current trainees feel their practical experiences of behaviour management and teaching pupils with special educational needs and/or disabilities are limited due to the nature of their placement schools. However, usually trainees benefit from specialist guidance and visits to other settings during their training year. Former trainees confirm that NMAPS equipped them with a secure knowledge of safeguarding and how and why to adapt their teaching to meet the needs of different groups of pupils.

p.1

Information about this ITE partnership

◼ NMAPS is led by and based at Wycombe High School. Governance of the SCITT is overseen by the Wycombe High School Academies Trust. The headteacher of the school is the accounting officer. ◼ Since opening three years ago, NMAPS has attracted growing numbers of trainees each year. Trainees train to teach secondary-age (11 to 16 years) pupils in either mathematics or physics. Nearly all complete a postgraduate certificate in education with the University of Buckingham. ◼ Fifty-nine trainees started their training in September 2020. By the time of this inspection, 53 were still on the course, six trainees having withdrawn or deferred during the year. Four trainees were engaged in the Department for Education’s Researchers in Schools programme and following the School Direct route. ◼ This national, subject-specialist SCITT currently operates via eight regional hubs. Each hub is led by either one or two schools supporting a wider network of

p.2

Information about this ITE partnership

placement schools in the local area. The hub schools are Bolton School, Camden School for Girls and Queen Elizabeth’s Girls’ School, Charterhouse, Cheadle Hulme School, Dulwich College, Headington School and Wycombe High School, King’s High School and Warwick School, and Oundle School. There are plans to open further hubs to increase national coverage and in areas of high demand. ◼ In addition to the hub lead schools, the partnership involves a large number of placement schools, some of which change from year to year. This year, trainees have been placed at a total of 43 different schools across the partnership. ◼ The independent schools that lead most of the current hubs are not inspected by Ofsted. Of the other 89 schools involved in the partnership over the past three years, most were graded ‘good’ or ‘outstanding’, five were judged ‘requires improvement’ and two ‘inadequate’ at their last inspection.

p.2

Information about this inspection

◼ This inspection was conducted by one of Her Majesty’s Inspectors (HMI) together with two Ofsted Inspectors (OI). ◼ Inspectors met with the accounting officer, the SCITT lead, the director of the SCITT, the programme leader and a representative of the University of Buckingham. The lead inspector spoke with five headteachers or senior leaders of schools in their role as members of the strategic board. A meeting was also held with the chair and vice-chair of Wycombe High School Academies Trust. ◼ Inspectors held discussions with a total of 16 trainees and four previous NMAPS trainees now employed in schools, either when visiting them in schools or during online meetings. ◼ The inspection team carried out focused reviews in mathematics and physics. They met with a selection of subject leads from the SCITT’s different hubs, scrutinised course documents and visited six schools to talk with senior leaders, mentors and

p.2

Information about this inspection

trainees. Inspectors reviewed evidence of trainees’ learning and, where possible, observed them teaching the subject being reviewed.

p.2

better?

Working with subject experts and professional associations, leaders have designed a well- structured, coherent and ambitious ITE curriculum informed by the ITE core content framework. Together, SCITT leaders, hub subject leads (HSLs) and mentors pass on their infectious enthusiasm for, and expertise in, teaching physics and mathematics to trainees. Subject experts from each region are appointed as HSLs. They deliver the centrally agreed course to trainees in their local network of schools. HSLs maintain oversight of the programme and the quality of mentorship in their region. This small team approach ensures alignment between central training and what trainees learn through the generally expert mentorship they receive in schools.

p.3

better?

This collaborative approach to curriculum design and delivery has worked well to date. Regular meetings between HSLs and SCITT leaders are used to good effect to review and refine curriculum provision. HSLs make skilled use of pertinent research to develop the hub-based, subject training sessions. Experienced curriculum leaders know exactly what they want trainees to learn and how their knowledge will be built up over time.

p.3

better?

A small minority of new mentors and HSLs do not have as secure an understanding of the partnership’s curriculum and best practice in ongoing assessment of trainees’ learning. Without more detailed curriculum plans to refer to, some inconsistencies in practice have appeared this year. This is due to changes in school-based staff and HSLs as the partnership has evolved, coupled with the impact of the pandemic this year. Leaders’ planned improvements to assessment and monitoring systems have been delayed. The pandemic has also impacted on induction of mentors and necessitated changes to the training programme.

p.3

better?

Communication between SCITT leaders and partnership schools is strong. Headteachers are willing to give their staff’s time to the partnership because of the benefits NMAPS membership brings to their schools. School leaders from the lead schools within each hub act as a strategic board. Board members are kept well informed via quality assurance systems and through their schools being actively involved in the partnership. They offer suitably robust guidance and challenge to SCITT leaders.

p.3

(Information for the partnership and appropriate authority)

◼ Changes to staffing within schools, and the rapid growth of the partnership, have impacted upon the consistency of expert mentorship and leadership across and within the hubs. Leaders’ induction programmes for all mentors and HSLs at the beginning of each year are valued. However, they have not ensured all mentors and HSLs are fully aware of the scope of NMAPS’ ITE curriculum. The full execution of leaders’ existing plans, together with more effective monitoring, is required to ensure the highest quality of mentorship across the partnership. ◼ The quality and depth of the professional dialogue that exists between mentors and trainees is not consistently reflected in the trainees’ online portfolios. This restricts SCITT leaders’ quality assurance and oversight of ongoing assessment of trainee’s learning across the partnership. Leaders have designed significant improvements to their quality assurance and assessment systems. However, the delivery of these has

p.3

(Information for the partnership and appropriate authority)

been delayed by the pandemic. These plans for richer ongoing assessment, with a tighter alignment to the core content of the curriculum, need to be implemented as a matter of priority.

p.4

compliance criteria?

◼ The partnership meets the DfE statutory compliance criteria

p.4

ITE Partnership details

Unique reference number 1272920 Inspection number 10188462

p.5

ITE Partnership details

This inspection was carried out by Her Majesty’s Inspector (HMI) and Ofsted Inspectors (OIs) in accordance with the ‘Initial teacher education inspection framework and handbook’. This framework and handbook sets out the statutory basis and framework for initial teacher education (ITE) inspections in England from September 2020.

p.5

ITE Partnership details

Type of ITE Partnership SCITT Phases provided Secondary Date of previous inspection Not previously inspected

p.5

Inspection team

Matthew Newberry, Lead inspector Her Majesty’s Inspector Paul Metcalf Ofsted Inspector Gary Holden Ofsted Inspector

p.5

Annex: Partnership settings, schools and colleges

Inspectors contacted trainees and staff at the following settings, schools and colleges as part of this inspection:

p.6

Ofsted grade

Headington School 123290 Secondary September 2018 ISI - Excellent St Michael’s Catholic School 110516 Secondary September 2019 Good Dulwich College 100861 Secondary September 2018 ISI - Excellent The Elmgreen School 144309 Secondary September 2018 Good Charterhouse 125340 Secondary September 2018 ISI - Excellent Broadwater School 147935 Secondary September 2019 Good guidance ‘Raising concerns and making a complaint about Ofsted’, which is available from Ofsted’s website: www.gov.uk/government/publications/complaints-about-ofsted . If you would like Ofsted to send you a copy of the guidance, please telephone 0300 123 1231, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk .

p.6

Ofsted grade

achieve excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children’s social care, and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory and Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, further education and skills, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and other secure establishments. It assesses council children’s services, and inspects services for children looked after, safeguarding and child protection. If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please telephone 0300 123 1231, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk . You may reuse this information (not including logos) free of charge in any format or medium, under the terms of the Open Government Licence. To view this licence, visit www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-

p.7

Ofsted grade

government-licence , write to the Information Policy Team, The National Archives, Kew, London TW9 4DU, or email: psi@nationalarchives.gsi.gov.uk .

p.7

Ofsted grade

Interested in our work? You can subscribe to our monthly newsletter for more information and updates: http://eepurl.com/iTrDn .

p.7

Ofsted grade

T: 0300 123 1231 Textphone: 0161 618 8524 E: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk W: www.gov.uk/ofsted

p.7

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion