Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Other · Ofsted letter

Setting

Inspected 27 May 2021

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

Ahmed Marikar

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspection datesingle source

    27 May 2021

  • Inspectorssingle source

    Ahmed Marikar

  • Postcode verified

    L20 5ED

Page 1 of 4
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+56Positivemore positive than 83% of reports of this type

In line with other reports of this type.

Praisepositiveeffectivelystrongimprovingsuccessfulenthusiasmenjoyrigorous
Criticismweaknessesrequires improvementabsence

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsWhat needs to improve positive critical
  • Findings1029w+61
  • What needs to improve109w−20

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No strong criticism found.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
4
Words of findings
1,136
about usual (typical 963)
Reading level
Fairly hard
Flesch 52, typical 48
Average sentence
18 words
Next steps
3
typical 2
Hedged sentences
6%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 90%What needs to improve 10%

Full report text

Store Street Manchester M1 2WD T 0300 123 1231 www.gov.uk/ofsted

p.1

Elizabeth Gunnion Headteacher Linacre Primary School Thornton Road Bootle Merseyside L20 5ED

p.1

School

Following my visit to your school on 27 May 2021, I write on behalf of Her Majesty’s Chief Inspector of Education, Children’s Services and Skills to confirm the monitoring inspection findings. Thank you for the help you gave during the inspection and for the time you made available to discuss the actions that have been taken to improve the school since the most recent section 5 inspection.

p.1

School

The monitoring inspection was carried out under section 8(2) of the Education Act 2005 and has taken place because the school has received two successive judgements of requires improvement at its previous section 5 inspections.

p.1

School

This was the first routine inspection the school received since the COVID-19 (coronavirus) pandemic began. I discussed the impact of the pandemic with you and have taken that into account in my evaluation.

p.1

School

Having considered the evidence, I am of the opinion that at this time:

p.1

Leaders and those responsible for governance are taking effective action

in order for the school to become a good school.

p.1

Leaders and those responsible for governance are taking effective action

The school should take further action to:

p.1

Leaders and those responsible for governance are taking effective action

 identify the knowledge that pupils need to know and the order in which this content is taught in geography, history and science  support subject leaders further so that they can plan and check the delivery of new curriculums.

p.1

Context

Since the previous inspection, a new subject leader for mathematics has taken up post. A new chair of the governing body has been appointed.

p.2

Context

Leaders’ plans for improvement have been disrupted by the absence of the headteacher and other senior leaders for periods of time across the academic year due to COVID-19.

p.2

Main findings

Following the previous inspection in June 2019, you developed a shared vision of what needs to be done to move the school forward. The school improvement plan is underpinned by realistic timescales and success criteria to review progress. Despite the impact of the pandemic, you along with staff are making a positive difference to the quality of education that pupils receive.

p.2

Main findings

You have placed a strong focus on improving pupils’ reading skills. Staff training has been successful in ensuring a consistent approach to the teaching of phonics and reading. Pupils who read to me used their phonics knowledge well to sound out unfamiliar words. The books that pupils read match the sounds that they are learning. Older pupils talked with enthusiasm about the books that they have read.

p.2

Main findings

Following your review of the curriculum, you have implemented new curriculum plans in many subjects, including mathematics and art. These curriculums are planned in a logical order and outline the key knowledge that pupils need to know and remember. However, the curriculum plans in science, geography and history are not as far ahead as you would want them to be. Leaders are in the process of adapting these plans to identify what pupils need to learn and when they should gain this knowledge.

p.2

Main findings

You are providing pupils with more opportunities to develop their vocabulary and stamina in writing. I saw some emerging examples of this in science and history books. However, due to the pandemic you have not been able to see the full impact of your efforts yet.

p.2

Main findings

Teachers encourage pupils to develop their knowledge through clear explanations and address any misconceptions that pupils may have. Pupils told me that they have opportunities to revisit prior knowledge across different subjects. This is helping them to apply what they know to new contexts. For example, pupils used their scientific knowledge to explain how light is reflected and transmitted through different materials.

p.2

Main findings

You have provided training activities for leaders to develop their skills. This is beginning to help them to lead their areas of responsibility with greater confidence. That said, subject leaders are still in the early stages of checking that the new curriculum plans are making a positive difference to pupils’ learning.

p.2

Main findings

You have changed the classroom organisation in the early years. You believe that is helping children to be better prepared for their next steps. You have taken appropriate action to ensure that children in the Nursery and Reception classes have more opportunities to develop their knowledge of reading, writing and mathematics.

p.3

Main findings

Pupils from a diverse range of backgrounds work well together. Pupils who are new to the school are warmly welcomed and quickly become part of the school family. Pupils are given more opportunities to develop their knowledge of British values, such as democracy, through class assemblies. Pupils told me that they enjoy participating in the school parliament. You have focused on improving pupils’ attendance. You have introduced a more rigorous approach to following up absences. In addition, the range of rewards for good attendance are encouraging pupils to attend school more regularly than they did in the past.

p.3

Main findings

Following the additional monitoring visit in January 2021, you were asked to improve some aspects of the delivery of remote education. You are providing more guidance for parents and carers on how to support their children’s learning in the basic skills of English and mathematics. In addition, you developed ways to check the quality of teachers’ assessments and the feedback that they gave to pupils.

p.3

Main findings

Governors have the best interests of pupils and staff at the heart of their work. They know the strengths and weaknesses of the school well through regular meetings and reports from leaders. Governors support and challenge leaders effectively.

p.3

Additional support

You have used the support provided by the local authority and the English and mathematics Hubs to help you develop the early years provision and make some improvements to the curriculum. Support from a national leader of education (NLE) has enabled you to plan effectively in order to improve the quality of education across the school. Training for leaders has helped to develop the skills of senior and subject leaders. Your engagement with a multi-academy trust has been beneficial to leaders and staff when sharing ideas and expertise.

p.3

Evidence

During the inspection, I met with you, other senior leaders, subject leaders, pupils, four members of the governing body, a representative of the local authority and the NLE supporting leaders. This was to discuss the actions taken since the last inspection. I made short visits to lessons, listened to pupils read, spoke with pupils and looked at work in their books. I examined a range of documentation, including the school improvement plan, minutes of governing body meetings and curriculum plans. I checked the single central record of the suitability of staff to work with children. I also looked at 10 free-text responses to Ofsted’s online questionnaire, Parent View, and 12 responses to Ofsted’s staff questionnaire.

p.3

Evidence

I am copying this letter to the chair of the governing body, the regional schools commissioner and the director of children’s services for Sefton. This letter will be published on the Ofsted reports website.

p.4

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion