Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Schools & FE · School inspection (EIF)

St Nicholas' CofE Middle School

Inspected 9 Jun 2021 · published 14 Jul 2021 · URN 144257

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

Requires improvement

Eve Morris (lead), Mike Onyon, Russell Hinton

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspection date verified

    9 Jun 2021

  • Inspectors verified

    Eve Morris, Mike Onyon, Russell Hinton

  • Behaviour and attitudes verified

    Good

  • Leadership and management verified

    Requires improvement

  • Overall effectiveness verified

    Requires improvement

  • Personal development verified

    Good

  • Quality of education verified

    Requires improvement

  • Postcode verified

    WR10 2ER

  • Name on report verified

    St Nicholas’ Church of England Middle School

  • URN verified

    144257

Page 1 of 7
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Grade profile

Hollow rings show the previous inspection, 2020.

  • OverallRequires improvement
  • Behaviour and attitudesGood
  • Leadership and managementRequires improvement
  • Personal developmentGood
  • Quality of educationRequires improvement

15% of comparable inspections in the last three years were graded Requires improvement (5,043 inspections).

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+9Mostly positivemore positive than 33% of reports of this type graded Requires improvement
OutstandingGoodRIInadequate

In line with other reports of this type graded Requires improvement.

Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.

Praiseeffectiveimprovedeffectivelyrespectfulsafewell-plannedwell plannedhappy
Criticismnot yetnot strongweaknessesnot secureconcernsinconsistenciesinconsistentnot always

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsWhat needs to improveSafeguardingAbout the inspection positive critical
  • Findings1058w+8
  • Safeguarding95w+14
  • What needs to improve25w—

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No standout praise found.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
7
Words of findings
1,145
about usual (typical 1215)
Reading level
Fairly hard
Flesch 57, typical 56
Average sentence
14 words
Next steps
6
typical 5
Hedged sentences
6%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 64%Safeguarding 6%What needs to improve 2%About the inspection 29%

Full report text

Inspection of St Nicholas’ Church of England Middle School Main Street, Pinvin, Pershore, Worcestershire WR10 2ER

p.1

Overall effectiveness Requires improvement

The quality of education Requires improvement Behaviour and attitudes Good Personal development Good Leadership and management Requires improvement Previous inspection grade Inadequate 8–9 June 2021

p.1

What is it like to attend this school?

St Nicholas’ Church of England Middle School is an improving school. It is welcoming and inclusive. It is a happy school, where people get on. Pupils show tolerance and understanding of people’s differences. Pupils are safe and well cared for. Incidents of bullying are very rare, but pupils say that if it does occur, teachers deal with it quickly.

p.2

What is it like to attend this school?

Senior leaders have worked hard to improve the quality of education that the pupils receive. Staff now expect pupils to achieve well and pupils are rising to these expectations. Teaching has improved and pupils remember, and build on, what they are taught. Subject leaders have started to develop their subjects. There is still more to do to ensure that pupils experience well-planned and sequenced learning in all subjects.

p.2

What is it like to attend this school?

Pupils’ behaviour allows learning to happen. Across the school, there is a consistent approach to managing behaviour. Pupils recognise this. A pupil’s comment summed up the views of many when they said, ‘We don’t get away with things anymore, which is good. It means we can learn.’

p.2

What is it like to attend this school?

Most parents and carers are pleased with the education that the school provides. However, a few say that there is still work to do. Senior leaders acknowledge this and are working to communicate more effectively with parents.

p.2

better?

The headteacher has established a purposeful workplace, where workload and well- being are prioritised. There is a shared vision among staff. Senior leaders, including governors, have tackled the root cause of weaknesses, with effective support from the trust. Behaviour, attendance and the quality of education have improved. However, subject leaders are in the early stages of leading their subjects. They do not yet have a secure overview of their subjects across the school. Senior leaders recognise that subject leaders need to receive additional training and support to be able to lead their subjects more effectively.

p.2

better?

Senior leaders have prioritised improvements in reading, writing and mathematics. Teachers’ subject knowledge was highlighted as an issue at the last inspection, so leaders quicky put training in place to address this. Staff’s subject knowledge has improved significantly as a result. There are consistent approaches to the teaching of reading, writing and mathematics. Pupils read regularly in school. Teachers choose books that are challenging and motivating for pupils to study.

p.2

better?

Leaders are reviewing how learning is organised. Although plans have been put in place, subject leaders have not yet considered the ‘big picture’ of what pupils learn across their time in school. Therefore, not all subjects are as well planned and sequenced as they should be. In addition, there is variability in how well the plans are implemented. Not all teachers are ensuring that pupils remember what they 8–9 June 2021

p.2

3

have been taught. This is partly because some teachers do not yet use assessment wisely enough to check pupils’ learning and to adapt the learning if needed.

p.3

3

The provision for pupils with special education needs and/or disabilities (SEND) is effective. The special educational needs coordinator (SENCo) makes sure that teachers know and understand pupils’ needs and what support pupils require. This means that pupils with SEND are making much better progress and are able to access learning alongside their peers.

p.3

3

Leaders make sure that pupils are well prepared to be good citizens. Pupils take pride in their school and the local community. They learn to accept others from a variety of backgrounds and how to value differences. All pupils are welcoming and respectful. Pupils understand how they can give their views through the student parliament. However, pupils cannot always remember what they have learned in the curriculum about faiths and other cultures.

p.3

3

Pupils develop their confidence and independence. Pupils talk fondly about the annual residential visits in which they take part. These include visiting an outdoor education centre, a creative arts residential trip and a trip to France. Although these have been paused due to the pandemic, leaders are passionate about running these as soon as they can.

p.3

Safeguarding

The arrangements for safeguarding are effective.

p.3

Safeguarding

Leaders have ensured that safeguarding is a priority for all staff. Staff have completed a wide range of safeguarding training. All staff know how to raise concerns if they have them. Detailed record-keeping shows that staff follow reporting procedures well. Leaders work closely with external agencies to keep vulnerable pupils safe. Staff are tenacious in ensuring that pupils and families receive the support they need.

p.3

Safeguarding

Pupils are taught how to avoid the possible dangers they might face outside school. They learn how to keep themselves safe, including when online.

p.3

(Information for the school and appropriate authority)

 Leaders have overhauled the curriculum because pupils’ learning across the school was not secure. There are now clear plans for each subject. However, these plans are not sequenced well enough in all subjects. As a result, pupils do not progressively build on their knowledge in those subjects. Leaders should ensure that cohesive plans are in place across all year groups, and that these are carefully thought through, so that pupils’ knowledge builds over time. 8–9 June 2021

p.3

4

 Many subject leaders are new to their role. Senior leaders have supported subject leaders in developing curriculum plans, and improvements are evident. However, inconsistencies remain. Subject leaders need to have a deeper understanding of how to monitor, evaluate and review their subject, in order to check that curriculum plans have the intended impact.  Pupils do not yet have a strong understanding of what they have learned. This is because teachers and teaching assistants do not have strong enough pedagogical knowledge to deliver the curriculum. In addition, the effectiveness of staff’s checks on what pupils remember are inconsistent. Leaders should ensure that teachers and teaching assistants consider the most effective approaches to delivering the curriculum and how to assess pupils’ learning.  Pupils are respectful and understanding of differences. However, they do not always remember the knowledge that they learn about faiths and other

p.4

4

cultures. Leaders should ensure that they promote diversity through planned and sequenced opportunities in the curriculum, so that pupils develop a deeper knowledge of different faiths and cultures.

p.4

How can I feed back my views?

or to find out what other parents and carers think. We use Ofsted Parent View information when deciding which schools to inspect, when to inspect them and as part of their inspection.

p.4

How can I feed back my views?

The Department for Education has further guidance on how to complain about a school.

p.4

How can I feed back my views?

If you are the school and you are not happy with the inspection or the report, you can complain to Ofsted .

p.4

Further information

You can search for published performance information about the school.

p.4

Further information

In the report, ‘disadvantaged pupils’ refers to those pupils who attract government pupil premium funding: pupils claiming free school meals at any point in the last six years and pupils in care or who left care through adoption or another formal route. 8–9 June 2021

p.4

Date of previous inspection

4 and 5 February 2020, under section 5 of the Education Act 2005

p.5

Information about this school

 The school is part of the Diocese of Worcester Multi Academy Trust (DOWMAT).  The school uses alternative provision provided by Aspire Academy. Ofsted inspects this provision separately.  A Statutory Inspection of Anglican and Methodist Schools (SIAMS) inspection to evaluate the distinctiveness and effectiveness of St Nicholas’ Church of England Middle School as a Church of England school took place on 14 June 2016.  The school has a breakfast club operating on the site. The school manages the provision.

p.5

Information about this inspection

We carried out this inspection under section 8 of the Education Act 2005. We deemed the inspection a section 5 inspection under the same Act.

p.5

Information about this inspection

In accordance with section 13(5) of the Education Act 2005, Her Majesty’s Chief Inspector is of the opinion that the school no longer requires significant improvement. 8–9 June 2021

p.5

6

 Inspectors met with the headteacher, deputy headteacher, SENCo, curriculum leaders, and the chair and vice-chair of the school local academy board.  Inspectors also met with the chief executive officer and other representatives of DOWMAT.  Inspectors examined a range of school documentation, including leaders’ self- evaluation, published information on the school’s website, the school’s statement of action, improvement plans, and documentation relating to pupils’ attendance and behaviour.  Inspectors considered the 79 responses to Ofsted’s online survey, Parent View, including 62 free-text responses, and considered 27 responses to the staff survey. Team inspectors met with parents at the start of the day.  Inspectors carried out deep dives in reading, mathematics, writing, science and French. This included visiting lessons, looking at pupils’ work, meeting with senior and subject leaders, and discussions with teachers and pupils.

p.6

Inspection team

Eve Morris, lead inspector Her Majesty’s Inspector

p.6

Inspection team

Russell Hinton Ofsted Inspector 8–9 June 2021

p.6

7

regulates and inspects to achieve excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children’s social care, and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory and Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, further education and skills, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and other secure establishments. It assesses council children’s services, and inspects services for children looked after, safeguarding and child protection.

p.7

7

If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please telephone 0300 123 1231, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk .

p.7

7

You may reuse this information (not including logos) free of charge in any format or medium, under the terms of the Open Government Licence. To view this licence, visit www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-government-licence/ , write to the Information Policy Team, The National Archives, Kew, London TW9 4DU, or email: psi@nationalarchives.gsi.gov.uk .

p.7

7

Interested in our work? You can subscribe to our monthly newsletter for more information and updates: http://eepurl.com/iTrDn .

p.7

7

T: 0300 123 1231 Textphone: 0161 618 8524 E: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk W: www.gov.uk/ofsted

p.7

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion