Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Other · Ofsted report

St. George's Academy Partnership

Inspected 27 May 2021 · published 14 Jul 2021 · URN 70291

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

John Lawson (lead), Chris Stevens, Di Mullan

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspection date verified

    27 May 2021

  • Inspectors verified

    Chris Stevens, Di Mullan, John Lawson

  • Postcode verified

    NG34 7PP

  • Name on report verified

    St. George’s Academy Partnership

  • URN verified

    70291

Page 1 of 7
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+31Mostly positivemore positive than 40% of reports of this type

In line with other reports of this type.

Praisevery wellvery effectiveeffectivepositiveambitioushigh-qualityskilledsuccessful
Criticisminconsistenciesnot precisenot effectiveweakernot yetnot accurate

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsAbout the inspection positive critical

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
7
Words of findings
837
shorter than usual (typical 1049)
Reading level
Hard
Flesch 45, typical 45
Average sentence
14 words
Next steps
5
typical 5
Hedged sentences
20%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 54%About the inspection 46%

Full report text

St. George’s Academy Partnership St. George’s Academy, Westgate, Sleaford NG34 7PP

p.1

Inspection judgements

Primary and secondary age-phase combined

p.1

Overall effectiveness Good

The quality of education and training Good

p.1

Overall effectiveness Good

Overall effectiveness at previous inspection Good

p.1

What is it like to be a trainee at this ITE partnership?

Trainees speak highly of their training experience. They say they feel they ‘belong’ as a cohort, as well as to their placement settings. Communications are very effective. Trainees and staff say, ‘It’s all about the people.’ The partnership provides the care, support and guidance trainees need to succeed.

p.1

What is it like to be a trainee at this ITE partnership?

Trainees benefit from a very well-balanced programme of university, subject-specialist and school-based training. The regular meetings trainees have with their mentors help make sure that what they learn in taught sessions is threaded through to their placements. The different parts of the training programme link together well.

p.1

What is it like to be a trainee at this ITE partnership?

Trainees are taught to be ambitious for all pupils, including those with special educational needs and/or disabilities (SEND). Trainees are taught some of the most important knowledge in the different subjects and effective ways of teaching. All trainees are taught the importance of teaching pupils to read, including phonics. They learn to manage pupils’ behaviour well and understand the importance of building positive relationships.

p.1

What is it like to be a trainee at this ITE partnership?

The partnership prepares trainees for the realities of teaching and the importance of work- life balance and personal well-being. Trainees are prepared very well to teach in their first year of teaching, as well as their careers beyond.

p.1

Information about this ITE partnership

◼ St George’s Academy Partnership currently offers primary and secondary phase training. Primary trainees are prepared to teach pupils in the three to 11 age range. Secondary trainees are prepared to teach pupils in the 11 to 16 age range in a range of subjects. The primary phase will discontinue at the end of the current academic year. ◼ In 2020/21, the partnership has 41 trainees. There are 15 trainees in the primary phase and 26 trainees in the secondary phase. ◼ The partnership works with a range of partner settings, primary and secondary schools. These are a mixture of settings of different sizes and local contexts. The partnership includes settings and schools who received a range of different Ofsted judgements at their most recent inspection. ◼ The partnership offers school-centred initial teacher training (SCITT). Trainees work towards the award of qualified teacher status and a postgraduate certificate in

p.2

Information about this ITE partnership

education which is accredited by the University of Lincoln. All trainees follow a School Direct route. ◼ Inspectors visited one nursery, five primary and four secondary settings. One primary visit was remote due to the impact of COVID-19 (coronavirus). Nearly all settings visited were judged to be good or better at their most recent inspection.

p.2

Information about this inspection

◼ The inspection was carried out by three of Her Majesty’s Inspectors. ◼ Inspectors spoke with the head of the SCITT, the principal of St George’s Academy, the primary and secondary phase leaders and other senior staff and subject specialists. They met with school leaders, trainees, mentors and curriculum leaders from the University of Lincoln. ◼ Inspectors spoke with 10 current and former trainees from the primary phase, and 14 trainees from the secondary phase. ◼ Inspectors undertook focused reviews of reading, geography and history, and science in the primary phase and of history, mathematics, and design and technology in the secondary phase to evaluate the quality of education and training. ◼ Inspectors visited eight settings and communicated remotely with two settings. This was due to the impact of COVID-19.

p.2

better?

Leaders check that the partnership meets, and often goes beyond, the requirements of the Core Content Framework (CCF). Primary trainees, for example, are asked to create a phonics leaflet or video presentation to explain phonics to parents. In a secondary design and technology lesson, a trainee gave pupils a ‘driving test’ for sewing machines. The partnership prepares trainees to meet the needs of pupils with SEND or who speak English as an additional language well. Trainees say, ‘All children are entitled to the same curriculum.’ T he partnership provides training on understanding autism spectrum disorder, lesbian, gay, bisexual and trans awareness and promoting pupils’ mental health and well- being. Primary trainees gain a detailed understanding of how to teach phonics. Secondary trainees are taught about how to support weaker readers. Secondary leaders have secure grasp of the curriculum in different subjects. Leaders check trainees’ subject knowledge

p.2

better?

and often personalise support to meet trainees’ individual needs.

p.3

better?

Leaders have a sharp understanding of the partnership’s priorities for improvement. They have changed the way they assess trainees and are making sure all staff understand the principles of the CCF. Occasionally, mentors’ and other staff’s understanding of the partnership’s priorities is not as precise as it could be. Mentors are skilled in guiding trainees to become successful teachers. They give trainees accurate feedback. However, sometimes the targets they set are not precise enough.

p.3

better?

Leaders value trainees’ feedback. In the ‘burning issues’ sessions, for example, trainees can raise any issues or ask questions about their training. Leaders consider trainees’ personal and professional development very well. A typical trainee comment is, ‘I have developed so much both as an individual and a teacher this year.’ Trainees understand their responsibilities to help keep pupils safe.

p.3

better?

There is a clear line of sight from trainees’ application, training and preparation for employment. Partnership school leaders value being involved in recruiting trainees. The partnership has a positive reputation for training high-quality teachers who are retained in the profession.

p.3

and secondary combined phase?

◼ Leaders’ new approach to assessing trainees’ learning and development is not yet fully established. Some staff are not sharp in their understanding and so their guidance for trainees is not quite as effective as it could be. Leaders should provide guidance and support so that all in the partnership understand what is expected. ◼ There are some inconsistencies in the quality of mentors’ work. In some instances, the targets they set are not as precise as they could be to better support trainees’ development. Leaders should check more carefully that mentors consistently have the skills and understanding they need to fulfil their roles fully.

p.3

(Information for the partnership and appropriate authority)

◼ The CCF is successfully integrated into the primary, and particularly, the secondary phase curriculum. Leaders, mentors and trainees can articulate examples of how the CCF principles are applied in the programme. However, partnership planning documentation and the terminology used by some mentors is sometimes not accurate. Inconsistencies mean that support for trainees is sometimes not quite as effective as it could be. Leaders should provide guidance and training to ensure all in the partnership understand fully the principles and terminology of the CCF. ◼ Mentors usually provide effective support. However, there are some inconsistencies. Sometimes , mentors’ targets are not sharply focused. Some mentors and other staff do not have a precise understanding of the expectations of the partnership’s formative assessment approach. Some mentors are not sure about how leaders quality assure their work. Leaders should strengthen further their quality assurance

p.3

(Information for the partnership and appropriate authority)

processes to ensure greater consistency.

p.4

comply with the ITE compliance criteria?

◼ The partnership meets the DfE statutory compliance criteria.

p.4

ITE Partnership details

Unique reference number 70291 Inspection number 101954429

p.5

ITE Partnership details

This inspection was carried out by Her Majesty’s Inspectors (HMIs) in accordance with the ‘Initial teacher education inspection framework and handbook’. This framework and handbook sets out the statutory basis and framework for initial teacher education (ITE) inspections in England from September 2020.

p.5

ITE Partnership details

Type of ITE Partnership SCITT Phases provided Primary Secondary Date of previous inspection 9 May 2016

p.5

Inspection team

John Lawson, Lead inspector Her Majesty’s Inspector Di Mullan Her Majesty’s Inspector

p.5

Annex: Partnership schools

Inspectors contacted trainees and staff at the following settings, schools and colleges, as part of this inspection:

p.6

grade

The Lincoln St Giles Nursery School 120365 Primary September 2017 Outstanding

p.6

grade

Dunston St Peter’s Church of England Primary School 120520 Primary September 2018 Good

p.6

grade

Caythorpe Primary School 144594 Primary September 2018 Not yet inspected Brown’s Church of England Primary School, Horbling 143258 Primary September 2019 Good

p.6

grade

Great Ponton Church of England Primary School 120602 Primary September 2019 Good

p.6

grade

Pilgrim Academy 144148 Primary September 2018 Good St George’s Academy (Sleaford and Ruskington sites) 136044 Secondary September 2014 Good

p.6

grade

Carre’s Grammar School 137213 Secondary September 2014 Good The Banovallum School 141581 Secondary September 2014 Good guidance ‘Raising concerns and making a complaint about Ofsted’, which is available from Ofsted’s website: www.gov.uk/government/publications/complaints-about-ofsted . If you would like Ofsted to send you a copy of the guidance, please telephone 0300 123 1231, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk .

p.6

grade

achieve excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children’s social care, and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory and Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, further education and skills, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and other secure establishments. It assesses council children’s services, and inspects services for children looked after, safeguarding and child protection. If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please telephone 0300 123 1231, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk . You may reuse this information (not including logos) free of charge in any format or medium, under the terms of the Open Government Licence. To view this licence, visit www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-

p.7

grade

government-licence , write to the Information Policy Team, The National Archives, Kew, London TW9 4DU, or email: psi@nationalarchives.gsi.gov.uk .

p.7

grade

Interested in our work? You can subscribe to our monthly newsletter for more information and updates: http://eepurl.com/iTrDn .

p.7

grade

T: 0300 123 1231 Textphone: 0161 618 8524 E: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk W: www.gov.uk/ofsted

p.7

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion