Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Schools & FE · School inspection (EIF)

Meadowpark School

Inspected 10 Jun 2021 · published 13 Jul 2021 · URN 130321

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

Inadequate

Paul Williams (lead), Susan Aykin

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspection date verified

    10 Jun 2021

  • Inspectors verified

    Paul Williams, Susan Aykin

  • Behaviour and attitudes verified

    Good

  • Early years verified

    Good

  • Leadership and management verified

    Inadequate

  • Overall effectiveness verified

    Inadequate

  • Personal development verified

    Good

  • Previous overall verified

    Good

  • Quality of education verified

    Requires improvement

  • Postcode verified

    SN6 6DD

  • Name on report verified

    Meadowpark School

  • URN verified

    130321

Page 1 of 9
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Grade profile

Hollow rings show the previous inspection, 2017.

  • OverallInadequate
  • Behaviour and attitudesGood
  • Early yearsGood
  • Leadership and managementInadequate
  • Personal developmentGood
  • Quality of educationRequires improvement

3% of comparable inspections in the last three years were graded Inadequate (5,043 inspections).

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

−25Mixedmore positive than 51% of reports of this type graded Inadequate
OutstandingGoodRIInadequate

In line with other reports of this type graded Inadequate.

Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.

Praiseeffectivelyconsistentlyindependentenjoysecurewell-sequencedclearlystrong relationships
Criticismconcernslackweaknot yetnot effectivegapsnot metat risk

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsSafeguardingAbout the inspectionLeadership positive critical
  • Findings1331w−20
  • Leadership276w+69
  • Safeguarding163w−79

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
9
Words of findings
1,733
about usual (typical 1552)
Reading level
Hard
Flesch 48, typical 53
Average sentence
15 words
Next steps
5
typical 6
Hedged sentences
10%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 62%Leadership 13%Safeguarding 8%About the inspection 17%

Full report text

The Old School House, High Street, Cricklade, Wiltshire SN6 6DD

p.1

Overall effectiveness Inadequate

The quality of education Requires improvement Behaviour and attitudes Good Personal development Good Leadership and management Inadequate Early years provision Good Overall effectiveness at previous inspection Good

p.1

Overall effectiveness Inadequate

Does the school meet the independent school standards?

p.1

What is it like to attend this school?

The culture of safeguarding is weak. The proprietor has brought in specialists to bring about improvements. They have introduced new systems, but gaps in teachers’ understanding of safeguarding remain. The quality of education at the school has declined since the previous standard inspection. The headteacher left recently. This had an unsettling effect on this small school.

p.2

What is it like to attend this school?

The interim headteacher joined six weeks ago. He has quickly stabilised the school and begun to give staff confidence that it can improve. Many aspects of leadership have improved since the emergency inspection in February 2021, but the arrangements to keep pupils safe are still not fully effective.

p.2

What is it like to attend this school?

Pupils are articulate, keen to learn and enjoy being at school. In particular, they enjoy the many sporting activities that are now restarting as COVID-19 (coronavirus) restrictions begin to ease.

p.2

What is it like to attend this school?

Pupils’ polite, calm behaviour is the hallmark of the school. Pupils respect their teachers and each other. As a result, they collaborate well. For example, in Year 2, pupils work together well to solve problems such as sorting materials into different groups.

p.2

What is it like to attend this school?

Very few pupils are worried about bullying. Pupils respect each other and their teachers. This leads to a distinctive family atmosphere at the school. Parents and carers value this highly.

p.2

better?

The proprietor has not ensured that the arrangements for keeping pupils safe are secure. Consequently, the independent school standards (the standards) are not met in full. The proprietor has not yet established a sufficient level of expertise in safeguarding practice among staff. New policies and systems, however, ensure that any welfare concerns can be formally logged.

p.2

better?

Over time, leaders have not evaluated the school’s performance accurately or enacted necessary changes. There has been a lack of cohesion in improvement planning. Although subject reviews have taken place, these have not brought about much-needed improvements.

p.2

better?

Subject leaders lack the knowledge they need to plan learning effectively in many subjects. Therefore, they are unable to support colleagues to improve their teaching. Some teachers have sought opportunities to develop their skills, but there is no plan in place to ensure that this need is tackled strategically.

p.2

better?

Leaders have made some efforts to develop well-sequenced plans in English and mathematics over the last two years. These have been successful, but teachers have not established cohesive plans in other subjects. In some subjects, such as science, 8–10 June 2021

p.2

3

French, computing and physical education, the curriculum is not planned effectively. These curriculum plans lack detail. Some teachers are not specific enough about what they want pupils to know and remember. In these subjects, learning is fragmented, and pupils do not always build on what they have learned before. Sometimes, pupils repeat work they have done previously, or miss important learning and so have gaps in their knowledge.

p.3

3

Teachers are aware of the importance of developing pupils’ phonics knowledge. From the start of Reception Year, children begin to recognise written letters and practise making the sounds these represent. Leaders have invested in new books that are better matched to pupils’ reading abilities. However, leaders know that further work is needed to ensure that teaching is specific about the skills pupils should learn.

p.3

3

Teachers focus on the development of pupils’ language throughout the curriculum. This supports pupils to extend their reading in Years 3 to 6 and to gather many cultural insights. However, pupils’ comprehension of the texts they read is sometimes not strong enough. Pupils show an enthusiasm for reading, and told inspectors about their favourite authors.

p.3

3

Pupils write well. Their work is imaginative. Pupils understand the different purposes of writing, and they are able to analyse authors’ intentions. For example, in Year 6, pupils craft analytical essays about ‘The Body’, a short story by Stephen King.

p.3

3

Mathematics teaching is well structured. Teachers introduce ideas sequentially and coherently. Pupils achieve well, particularly in number work. Some pupils find graphical work difficult; nevertheless, they say that teachers explain ideas clearly. This helps them overcome any difficulties.

p.3

3

Teachers’ assessment of pupils’ knowledge in mathematics and English is accurate. However, the school has not established a consistent system for assessing pupils’ knowledge and understanding in some subjects. Therefore, the reliability of checks on pupils’ learning varies considerably.

p.3

3

Staff pay careful attention to pupils with special educational needs and/or disabilities (SEND). The special educational needs coordinator (SENCo) works closely with parents to identify pupils’ needs. Parents appreciate the additional support that teachers provide. This extra help enables pupils with SEND to achieve well.

p.3

3

The personal, social and health education curriculum provides pupils with many experiences that build their knowledge of the world. For example, visits to the Houses of Parliament and studies of different cultures help pupils to understand values such as democracy and tolerance. Leaders plan events, such as staging a production of the musical ‘Grease’, that foster pupils’ social skills.

p.3

3

Children in early years form strong relationships with adults. Staff record children’s development in detail. They share in children’s successes at each step with parents. 8–10 June 2021

p.3

4

Children develop empathy and compassion in this environment. Parents feel involved in their children’s early education and are highly satisfied.

p.4

4

The proprietor’s oversight of the quality of education at the school is weak. The proprietor has recently set up an advisory board, but this group does not yet have a clear vision for the curriculum. There is little strategic planning for the development of the curriculum across the school.

p.4

4

The interim headteacher communicates well with staff and parents. He has begun to focus teachers’ attention on the things that make the most difference to pupils’ learning. Consequently, in a short period of time, he has gained the trust of staff and parents alike.

p.4

4

The school meets the requirements of schedule 10 of the Equality Act 2010.

p.4

4

The school does not meet the standards contained in parts 3 and 8 of the standards. It does not meet the safeguarding and welfare requirements of the early years foundation stage.

p.4

Safeguarding

The arrangements for safeguarding are not effective.

p.4

Safeguarding

Staff have received training in safeguarding practice. Even so, they do not consistently follow the guidance in the school’s safeguarding policies when concerns about pupils’ well-being are first raised. Therefore, pupils are still at risk of harm. Some policies that leaders have recently introduced are not yet established in teachers’ practice. For example, staff do not have a thorough understanding of the policy on physical intervention that has recently been introduced.

p.4

Safeguarding

The interim headteacher has a good understanding of safeguarding practice. Senior leaders now understand their roles more clearly. They have taken action to formalise processes that were not robust enough in the past. Records of concerns about pupils’ well-being and referrals to external agencies are now more detailed.

p.4

Safeguarding

The proprietor has ensured that planning for improvements to safeguarding practice is detailed and is reviewed regularly. This has brought about some improvement in systems and processes. The latest safeguarding policy is published on the school’s website.

p.4

(Information for the school and proprietor)

 Curriculum planning in many subjects is not precise. Consequently, pupils’ learning does not build sequentially and coherently over time. Leaders should ensure that curriculum planning in all subjects pays specific attention to the knowledge teachers want pupils to learn. 8–10 June 2021

p.4

5

 Teachers’ checks on pupils’ learning are not secure in many subjects. As a result, teachers are not clear about what pupils know, understand and can do. Leaders should ensure that the assessment of pupils’ learning is suitably rigorous and that it is coordinated effectively across all subjects.  The proprietor and the advisory board have not ensured that the standards are consistently met. The proprietor should ensure that senior leaders are appropriately challenged and supported across all aspects of the school’s work to ensure that the standards are met in full.  Staff do not understand the school’s safeguarding procedures clearly. Therefore, when concerns are raised about pupils’ welfare, they do not follow the procedures closely enough. Senior leaders should strengthen the culture of safeguarding by making sure that all staff have a secure understanding of how to respond appropriately to all concerns.

p.5

How can I feed back my views?

or to find out what other parents and carers think. We use Ofsted Parent View information when deciding which schools to inspect, when to inspect them and as part of their inspection.

p.5

How can I feed back my views?

The Department for Education has further guidance on how to complain about a school.

p.5

How can I feed back my views?

If you are the provider and you are not happy with the inspection or the report, you can complain to Ofsted . 8–10 June 2021

p.5

School details

Annual fees (day pupils) £7,545 to £9,840

p.6

School details

Email address info@meadowparkschool.co.uk

p.6

School details

Date of previous inspection 12–14 September 2017

p.6

Information about this school

 Meadowpark School is an independent day school operated by the proprietor, Education Plus Limited. The school’s bursar is a director of this company.  The school operates from one site in the town of Cricklade, six miles north west of Swindon.  The headteacher left the school in March 2021. The interim headteacher was appointed shortly after this. He took up his post on 19 April 2021.  The proprietor has appointed three people to form an advisory board. This board began its work in April 2021.  The school does not use alternative provision. 8–10 June 2021

p.6

7

 Ofsted carried out an emergency inspection of the school on 4 February 2021 because of safeguarding concerns. This inspection found that the school did not meet all of the independent school standards that were checked.  The previous standard inspection took place in September 2017.

p.7

Information about this inspection

We carried out this inspection under section 109(1) and (2) of the Education and Skills Act 2008. The purpose of the inspection is to advise the Secretary of State for Education about the school’s suitability for continued registration as an independent school.

p.7

Information about this inspection

The school has failed to meet the independent school standards. These are the requirements of the schedule to the Education (Independent School Standards) Regulations 2014.

p.7

Information about this inspection

 Inspectors met with the interim headteacher, senior leaders, the proprietor, the safeguarding governor and one member of the advisory panel.  The lead inspector toured the site with the interim headteacher to evaluate the suitability of the premises.  The lead inspector spoke with the designated safeguarding lead, scrutinised safeguarding documents, including records of pre-employment checks and safeguarding referrals to the local authority, and considered information about staff safeguarding training.  The lead inspector held telephone conversations with two officers of Wiltshire County Council.  Inspectors did deep dives in early reading, mathematics, English and French. In each of these subjects, inspectors met with teachers, reviewed curriculum plans, visited lessons, spoke with pupils and considered pupils’ written work.

p.7

Inspection team

Paul Williams, lead inspector Her Majesty’s Inspector

p.7

Inspection team

Susan Aykin Her Majesty’s Inspector 8–10 June 2021

p.7

Part 3. Welfare, health and safety of pupils

 7 The standard in this paragraph is met if the proprietor ensures that– – 7(a) arrangements are made to safeguard and promote the welfare of pupils at the school; and – 7(b) such arrangements have regard to any guidance issued by the Secretary of State.

p.8

Part 8. Quality of leadership in and management of schools

 34(1) The standard about the quality of leadership and management is met if the proprietor ensures that persons with leadership and management responsibilities at the school– – 34(1)(a) demonstrate good skills and knowledge appropriate to their role so that the independent school standards are met consistently; – 34(1)(b) fulfil their responsibilities effectively so that the independent school standards are met consistently; and – 34(1)(c) actively promote the well-being of pupils. –

p.8

Early Years Foundation Stage

 Safeguarding and welfare requirements: paragraphs 3.4, 3.6, 3.7, 3.21, 3.22 and 3.72 . 8–10 June 2021

p.8

9

to achieve excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children’s social care, and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory and Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, further education and skills, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and other secure establishments. It assesses council children’s services, and inspects services for children looked after, safeguarding and child protection.

p.9

9

If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please telephone 0300 123 1231, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk .

p.9

9

You may reuse this information (not including logos) free of charge in any format or medium, under the terms of the Open Government Licence. To view this licence, visit www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-government-licence/ , write to the Information Policy Team, The National Archives, Kew, London TW9 4DU, or email: psi@nationalarchives.gsi.gov.uk .

p.9

9

Interested in our work? You can subscribe to our monthly newsletter for more information and updates: http://eepurl.com/iTrDn .

p.9

9

T: 0300 123 1231 Textphone: 0161 618 8524 E: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk W: www.gov.uk/ofsted

p.9

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion