Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Social care · Social care inspection (SCCIF)

Azalea House

Inspected 10 Jun 2021 · published 13 Jul 2021 · URN 2547305

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Group verified

    Athena Family Services Limited

  • Inspection date verified

    10 Jun 2021

  • Inspectors verified

    Catherine Honey, Deirdra Keating

  • Leadership and management verified

    Good

  • Overall effectivenesssingle source

    Good

  • Postcode verified

    MK42 8LT

  • Name on report verified

    Azalea House

  • URN verified

    2547305

Page 1 of 7
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Grade profile

Each judgement on its scale, weakest to strongest.

  • OverallGood
  • Leadership and managementGood

70% of comparable inspections in the last three years were graded Good (12,716 inspections).

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+4Mixedmore positive than 10% of reports of this type graded Good
OutstandingGoodRIInadequate

Reads more critically than most reports of this type graded Good.

Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.

Praisepositivestrongeffectiveclearseriouseffectivelyconfidentlyenthusiastic
Criticismconcernsfailureweaknesseslacknot alwayslimitedunclear

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsAbout the inspectionWhat needs to improve positive critical
  • Findings1067w+2
  • What needs to improve183w+11

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
7
Words of findings
1,246
shorter than usual (typical 1609)
Reading level
Hard
Flesch 45, typical 43
Average sentence
14 words
Next steps
7
typical 5
Hedged sentences
7%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 65%What needs to improve 11%About the inspection 24%

Full report text

Inspection report for residential family centre: Azalea House 1 Azalea House Athena Family Services Limited 71 Spring Road, Kempston, Bedford, Bedfordshire MK42 8LT Inspected under the social care common inspection framework

p.1

Information about this residential family centre

The centre is owned by a private organisation. It is registered to provide care, accommodation and residential parenting assessments for up to four families. The centre can provide Parent Assessment Manual (PAMS) assessments. Parenting assessments take 12 weeks.

p.1

Information about this residential family centre

The registered manager is a qualified social worker and has been in post since January 2020.

p.1

Information about this residential family centre

Due to COVID-19 (coronavirus), at the request of the Secretary of State, we suspended all routine inspections of social care providers on 17 March 2020.

p.1

Information about this residential family centre

We last visited this home on 18 February 2021, to carry out a monitoring visit. The report is published on our website.

p.1

Overall experiences and progress of

children and parents, taking into account good

p.1

Overall experiences and progress of

How well children and parents are helped and protected good

p.1

Overall experiences and progress of

The effectiveness of leaders and managers good

p.1

Overall experiences and progress of

The residential family centre provides effective services that meet the requirements for good.

p.1

Overall experiences and progress of

Date of previous inspection: not applicable

p.1

Overall experiences and progress of

Overall judgement at last inspection: not applicable

p.1

Overall experiences and progress of

Enforcement action since last inspection: not applicable Inspection report for residential family centre: Azalea House 2

p.1

Overall experiences and progress of children and parents: good

The centre registered in January 2020. It provides parenting assessments and evidence-based court reports for families. The assessment takes place over a 12- week period. At the time of the visit, there were three families at the centre.

p.2

Overall experiences and progress of children and parents: good

The progress made by families is recognised and acknowledged by the staff. Feedback on the assessment process is provided each week by the manager, who balances any emerging concerns with positive observations. This feedback ensures that families are made aware of any concerns throughout the assessment.

p.2

Overall experiences and progress of children and parents: good

During the assessment, the levels of scrutiny and intensity can cause families anxiety. Some families do not like the assessment process. Despite this, they have positive interactions with the staff. This is testimony to the skills of the staff, who provide balanced and professional support.

p.2

Overall experiences and progress of children and parents: good

The staff understand the assessment framework, and some staff are trained to carry out PAMS assessments when instructed by the court. Other assessments are compiled by the manager using feedback and observations from the staff. The manager oversees the staff’s observations carefully, and challenges anything that is ambiguous or unclear. This oversight has helped staff to provide clear and accurate observations that contribute to the final report and ensure the process is fair.

p.2

Overall experiences and progress of children and parents: good

There are regular forums in which families can raise feedback. These include house meetings and weekly meetings with the manager. These forums give families an opportunity to share their views on their individual experience and any issues regarding their communal living.

p.2

Overall experiences and progress of children and parents: good

Families are encouraged to build structure and routine into their days. The centre has a range of indoor play resources. Families visit the local children’s centre for play sessions and use local amenities to shop.

p.2

Overall experiences and progress of children and parents: good

The centre is a detached property on a residential road and is close to shops and other amenities. The house provides ample space, a choice of comfortable living rooms and spacious family bedrooms. There have been some improvements made to the rear garden, which are ongoing. Despite the improvements, there are not enough outdoor resources for pre-school children and some areas of the garden require further work. There is rubble at the front of the property, left over from the garden work, and there are weeds growing around the house at the front and rear. These areas detract from an otherwise pleasant outdoor space.

p.2

How well children and parents are helped and protected: good

Closed-circuit television (CCTV) surveillance is used in bedrooms and communal areas. The level of surveillance is agreed prior to the family’s arrival. The use of Inspection report for residential family centre: Azalea House 3 CCTV is reviewed regularly, in agreement with the social workers and families. There is a good balance between the family’s privacy and safeguarding the children.

p.2

How well children and parents are helped and protected: good

The staff are aware of each family’s vulnerabilities and associated risks. The staff use risk assessments to categorise and understand risks associated with families and the locality. These risk assessments are monitored by the manager and the responsible individual. This monitoring has identified that the risk assessment for one family and the location risk assessment that did not include a serious incident that occurred while a family were at the centre. This incident was managed effectively to safeguard the family and others at the centre and the risk no longer exists. However, the failure to update these records was raised during internal and external monitoring but was not addressed.

p.3

How well children and parents are helped and protected: good

Families understand the house rules. The manager has encouraged regular, open communication. Families express their views confidently. Regular, open communication encourages an atmosphere that gives families a sense of well-being and security.

p.3

The effectiveness of leaders and managers: good

The registered manager is highly experienced and well-qualified for the role. She provides strong leadership for the staff, who value her support and guidance.

p.3

The effectiveness of leaders and managers: good

The staff team, despite being relatively new, is positive, enthusiastic and professional. The manager recognises that as the team is new, having time to bond is beneficial. She has booked a team day to help staff develop their professional relationships.

p.3

The effectiveness of leaders and managers: good

The manager and responsible individual are aware of the strengths and weaknesses of the centre. A vacancy in the management team has increased the manager’s workload. There has been a decision to reduce the number of families having assessments at any one time while a deputy manager is appointed. This measure has temporarily reduced the manager’s workload.

p.3

The effectiveness of leaders and managers: good

The manager provides good-quality supervisions for the staff. These meetings encourage reflection, address practice concerns and help identify when staff require further training.

p.3

The effectiveness of leaders and managers: good

The final parenting assessment reports are fair and balanced. The reports make clear recommendations to inform court proceedings. The staff have a good understanding of the parents and their individual needs. They work in a way that supports parents who have the capacity to improve their skills. The staff recognise the difficulties for parents who are being assessed and reduce any additional barriers.

p.3

The effectiveness of leaders and managers: good

There are several staff who are in their probationary period. There are times when staff who lack experience and have not completed their probation are left in sole charge of the centre. An on-call manager is always available to assist by phone, Inspection report for residential family centre: Azalea House 4 should the member of staff need support. However, this could lead to less supervision and observation, and therefore increase risk.

p.3

The effectiveness of leaders and managers: good

The responsible individual carries out the external monitoring visits each month. She works closely with the registered manager. The visits conclude with a comprehensive and detailed report, as well as a list of any actions that need to be taken. However, the manager does not always address these actions, and this reduces the capacity to improve the centre.

p.4

The effectiveness of leaders and managers: good

Feedback from stakeholders is very positive. Professionals identify good communication and well-written court reports. Health visitors said that the staff provide good, consistent advice for parents. Most professionals who use the centre recommend it, and several professionals commended the centre and the staff. Inspection report for residential family centre: Azalea House 5

p.4

Recommendations

 The registered person should ensure that that the centre provides a comfortable and homely environment, and is well maintained and well decorated. Avoidable hazards should be removed, as is consistent with a domestic setting. Risk reduction should not lead to an ‘institutional’ feel. (Residential family centre NMS 11.2)  The registered person should ensure that the centre provides facilities for the care of babies and children of all ages. (Residential family centre NMS 11.4)  The registered person should ensure that staff members left in charge of the centre have the relevant experience of working with families and in residential care settings, and have successfully completed their induction and probationary periods. (Residential family centre NMS 15.2)  The registered person should ensure that the manager regularly monitors, in line with the Residential Family Centre Regulations 2002, as amended, all records kept

p.5

Recommendations

by the centre, to ensure compliance with the centre’s policies, to identify any concerns about specific incidents and to identify patterns and trends. Immediate action should be taken to address any issues raised by this monitoring. (Residential family centre NMS 19.2)

p.5

Information about this inspection

Inspectors have looked closely at the experiences and progress of children and parents using the ‘Social care common inspection framework’. This inspection was carried out under the Care Standards Act 2000 to assess the effectiveness of the service, how it meets the core functions of the service as set out in legislation, and to consider how well it complies with the Residential Family Centre Regulations 2002 and the national minimum standards. Inspection report for residential family centre: Azalea House 6

p.5

Residential family centre details

Registered provider: Athena Family Services Limited

p.6

Residential family centre details

Registered provider address: 71 Spring Road, Kempston, Bedford, Bedfordshire MK42 8LT

p.6

Inspectors

Deirdra Keating, Social Care Inspector Catherine Honey, Social Care Inspector Inspection report for residential family centre: Azalea House 7 to achieve excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children’s social care, and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory and Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, further education and skills, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and other secure establishments. It assesses council children’s services, and inspects services for children looked after, safeguarding and child protection.

p.6

Inspectors

If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please telephone 0300 123 1231, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk . You may reuse this information (not including logos) free of charge in any format or medium, under the terms of the Open Government Licence. To view this licence, visit www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-government-licence , write to the Information Policy Team, The National Archives, Kew, London TW9 4DU, or email: psi@nationalarchives.gsi.gov.uk .

p.7

Inspectors

Interested in our work? You can subscribe to our monthly newsletter for more information and updates: http://eepurl.com/iTrDn .

p.7

Inspectors

T: 0300 123 4234 E: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk W: www.gov.uk/ofsted

p.7

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion