Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Schools & FE · Further education monitoring visit

Gordon Franks Training Limited

Inspected 24 Jun 2021 · published 12 Jul 2021 · URN 59227

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

Sharon Dowling

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspection date verified

    24 Jun 2021

  • Inspectorssingle source

    Sharon Dowling

  • Postcode verified

    B7 4JE

  • Name on report verified

    Gordon Franks Training Limited

  • URN verified

    59227

Page 1 of 5
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+10Mostly positivemore positive than 77% of reports of this type

In line with other reports of this type.

Praiseindependentthrivingstrongpositivewell supportedcleargapsaccurate
Criticismlimitedrequires improvementbelow

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

Findings positive critical

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
5
Words of findings
1,237
longer than usual (typical 36)
Reading level
Hard
Flesch 39, typical 37
Average sentence
19 words
Next steps
3
typical 0
Hedged sentences
0%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 100%

Full report text

Gordon Franks Training Limited Report following a monitoring visit to a ‘requires improvement’ provider

p.1

Name of lead inspector: Sharon Dowling, Her Majesty’s Inspector

p.1

Type of provider: Independent learning provider

p.1

Address: St James House St James Place Birmingham West Midlands B7 4JE Monitoring visit: Gordon Franks Training Limited, 24 June 2021

p.1

Context and focus of visit

Gordon Franks Training Limited (GFT) was inspected in February 2020. At that time, inspectors judged the overall effectiveness of the provision to require improvement.

p.2

Context and focus of visit

The focus of this monitoring visit was to evaluate the progress that leaders and managers have made in addressing the main areas for improvement identified at the previous inspection.

p.2

Context and focus of visit

Gordon Franks Training Limited is an independent learning provider based in the West Midlands offering apprenticeships, education programmes for young people, and traineeships. This visit focused on the apprenticeships. At the time of the visit, there were 156 learners following apprenticeships. The provider offers a mix of apprenticeship frameworks and standards, with the large majority of apprentices following level 2 or level 3 standards in early years, and business administration.

p.2

Context and focus of visit

The impact of COVID-19 (coronavirus) has been taken into account in the findings and progress judgements below.

p.2

Reasonable progress

Managers have implemented a number of changes to improve the quality of the apprenticeship training. Although there are early indications that these changes are having a positive impact on apprentices’ development of new knowledge, skills and behaviours, it is too soon to see the full impact. Leaders have changed the staffing structure to separate teaching and assessment, creating a greater emphasis on the teaching of new knowledge and the link between that knowledge and the workplace. Managers have carefully reviewed, planned and redesigned the curriculum. For example, in childcare they are clear on which skills need to be taught first, for example health and safety, safeguarding, and professional development. Employers state that they understand the curriculum that is taught and how this reflects their individual workplace situations. Curriculum managers and assessors have reviewed and recently implemented a

p.2

Reasonable progress

comprehensive onboarding process to improve the identification of apprentices’ starting points. Assessors share the individual learning plans with employers at the start of the apprenticeship and these plans are now being adjusted to reflect the employers’ Monitoring visit: Gordon Franks Training Limited, 24 June 2021 needs. For example, they have brought forward a unit on working with learners with special educational needs and disabilities, as this is where the apprentices were starting their rotation in the nursery. The revised curriculum includes taught sessions, independent learning sessions and activities. Teachers encourage apprentices to complete their independent learning and practice tasks to ensure they do not have any gaps in their knowledge, skills and behaviours.

p.2

Reasonable progress

Apprentices are required to self-assess their knowledge, skills and behaviours by answering questions and providing examples of their experience linked to the skills, knowledge and behaviours in the apprenticeship. For example, in early years, – as part of the skills scan – apprentices are asked to provide examples of how they have worked with partnership colleagues and parents/carers. Following the recruitment stage, assessors quickly meet with apprentices to review the skills scan. Assessors challenge apprentices on their self-assessment, if needed, to agree the learning plan and set targets. As a result, staff, apprentices and employers have an accurate view of the skills that recently recruited apprentices have at the start of their programme. As this new assessment was put in place in April, it is too early to see the impact of this on apprentices’ learning. Assessors frequently meet with apprentices and employers to review the skills scan

p.3

Reasonable progress

assessment. Through doing this, assessors gain feedback from apprentices and employers on how well they are improving their skills, knowledge and behaviours during the apprenticeship. Apprentices value the support they receive from the team at GFT. For example, assessors have supported apprentices well to change their work setting when they identified that they were not developing the skills and knowledge they would need to work in a nursery. Once in the correct setting, apprentices are thriving in the workplace, and employers value their skills highly. Learners towards the end of their apprenticeship are well supported to achieve. They describe the recent change of focus to a stronger link between the knowledge element and implementation in the workplace as being helpful in their preparation towards the end-point assessment. This has allowed them to give greater context to recent presentations made to managers and colleagues where they work. As a result,

p.3

Reasonable progress

workplace mentors are seeing a noticeable increase in their confidence over recent months.

p.3

Reasonable progress

Monitoring visit: Gordon Franks Training Limited, 24 June 2021

p.4

their full potential?

Managers have introduced a range of feedback activities to support apprentices. As a result, apprentices can identify quickly areas where they need more support, and they access this support to ensure they continue to make progress against their learning goals. For example, in business administration – at the end of taught sessions – apprentices, assessors and employers receive a session-review form that outlines the activities completed, the apprentice’s contribution to the session, and actions to link to workplace development. Apprentices make strong links between taught sessions and independent learning to their workplace development. For example, in early years, apprentices receive additional resources and discussion with their assessors to develop their understanding of working with children with special educational needs, such as autism spectrum disorder. They have used their skills and knowledge in these topics

p.4

their full potential?

to talk to parents about gaining assessments for children. Apprentices who have moved on from level 2 to level 3 can identify the differences in their level of study and the requirements for them, both in their assignments and at work. Assessors have high aspirations for apprentices. Apprentices are aiming to gain a distinction at end-point assessment; they understand what they need to do to achieve the highest grades. Employers state that they are involved in the feedback and reviews of apprentices’ progress. Apprentices benefit from feedback from employers. For example, business administration apprentices approaching the end-point assessment present to their colleagues and managers at work, who provide feedback to support improvement prior to the final presentation. Employers and apprentices appreciate the way in which managers and staff from the provider work with them. Employers state that they benefit from having apprentices

p.4

their full potential?

in the workplace and value them highly. Monitoring visit: Gordon Franks Training Limited, 24 June 2021 regulates and inspects to achieve excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children’s social care, and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory and Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, further education and skills, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and other secure establishments. It assesses council children’s services, and inspects services for children looked after, safeguarding and child protection.

p.4

their full potential?

If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please telephone 0300 123 1231, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk .

p.5

their full potential?

You may reuse this information (not including logos) free of charge in any format or medium, under the terms of the Open Government Licence. To view this licence, visit www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-government-licence/ , write to the Information Policy Team, The National Archives, Kew, London TW9 4DU, or email: psi@nationalarchives.gsi.gov.uk .

p.5

their full potential?

Interested in our work? You can subscribe to our monthly newsletter for more information and updates: http://eepurl.com/iTrDn .

p.5

their full potential?

T: 0300 123 1231 Textphone: 0161 618 8524 E: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk W: www.gov.uk/ofsted

p.5

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion