Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Schools & FE · School inspection (EIF)

St Joseph's Catholic Primary School

Inspected 27 May 2021 · published 9 Jul 2021 · URN 140590

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspection date verified

    27 May 2021

  • Inspectors verified

    Jean Watt, Tim Scargill-Knight

  • Behaviour and attitudes verified

    Good

  • Early years verified

    Good

  • Leadership and management verified

    Good

  • Overall effectiveness verified

    Good

  • Personal development verified

    Good

  • Quality of education verified

    Good

  • Postcode verified

    S25 2QD

  • Name on report verified

    St Joseph’s Catholic Primary School

  • URN verified

    140590

Page 1 of 8
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Grade profile

Hollow rings show the previous inspection, 2019.

  • OverallGood
  • Behaviour and attitudesGood
  • Early yearsGood
  • Leadership and managementGood
  • Personal developmentGood
  • Quality of educationGood

66% of comparable inspections in the last three years were graded Good (5,043 inspections).

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+58Positivemore positive than 50% of reports of this type graded Good
OutstandingGoodRIInadequate

In line with other reports of this type graded Good.

Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.

Praiseeffectivelyenjoyimprovedwell supportedeffectiveconsistentlyambitiouswell designed
Criticismpoorat riskconcernsharmnot happynot clear

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsSafeguardingAbout the inspection positive critical
  • Findings1149w+71
  • Safeguarding129w+3

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
8
Words of findings
1,249
about usual (typical 1098)
Reading level
Fairly hard
Flesch 57, typical 55
Average sentence
14 words
Next steps
6
typical 4
Hedged sentences
13%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 63%Safeguarding 7%About the inspection 30%

Full report text

Inspection of St Joseph’s Catholic Primary School Lidgett Lane, Dinnington, Sheffield, South Yorkshire S25 2QD

p.1

Overall effectiveness Good

The quality of education Good Behaviour and attitudes Good Personal development Good Leadership and management Good Early years provision Good Previous inspection grade Inadequate 26–27 May 2021

p.1

What is it like to attend this school?

Pupils enjoy attending school. They are happy and feel safe. The quality of education that they receive has improved significantly. Leaders have raised staff’s expectations about what pupils can achieve. They are ambitious for all pupils. They have made sure that the curriculum is delivered well by teaching staff. As a result, pupils achieve well.

p.2

What is it like to attend this school?

Leaders have made reading a priority. Pupils enjoy reading. They like listening to adults read to them in the daily ‘reading for pleasure’ sessions. Younger pupils vote each day for the book they would like to read. Parents recognise the improvements in the school, particularly in the teaching of reading.

p.2

What is it like to attend this school?

Pupils say that there is very little bullying. They know that if it does happen, adults sort it out quickly. In lessons, there is a calm and purposeful atmosphere, which helps pupils to get on with their learning.

p.2

What is it like to attend this school?

Pupils speak with excitement about trips to the community park and farm. Pupils are polite and respectful. They learn about people from other faiths and cultures. They understand that everyone should be treated equally.

p.2

better?

Leaders have rapidly improved the school, including the quality of education that pupils receive. Leaders have adopted a new curriculum for all subjects. This sets out, in a carefully planned sequence, the knowledge that pupils should learn. Staff have received training to help them to teach the new curriculum well. Teachers explain new learning clearly. They check that pupils have remembered the most important knowledge.

p.2

better?

Subject leaders have worked alongside specialist leaders of education to check that the changes that have been made to their subject curriculum are helping pupils to know and remember more. Through this process, subject leaders have developed the skills they need to effectively monitor the implementation of the curriculum for their subjects. However, not all subject leaders have sufficient time to undertake these checks.

p.2

better?

Leaders have established a rigorous approach to teaching early reading. Staff have received specialist training. The reading leader coaches staff to further improve the teaching of reading. Teachers check the sounds that pupils already know, and they use this information to make sure that pupils are taught at the right level. Staff give pupils lots of opportunities to practise the new sounds they are learning in their reading lessons and in the books they read. If pupils need help to catch up with the school’s curriculum for reading, they receive this quickly. As a result, pupils who are learning to read achieve well. 26–27 May 2021 Pupils are given lots of opportunities to explore mathematics. They are encouraged to explain their mathematical thinking. Leaders have introduced additional ‘maths meetings’, which are used to revisit previously taught content. As a result, pupils are remembering more of their learning in mathematics. Pupils told us they enjoy

p.2

better?

mathematics and know they are getting better at it. Occasionally, teachers do not identify that some pupils have made mistakes in their mathematics work.

p.3

better?

In subjects in the wider curriculum, such as geography, pupils are well supported to understand how their new learning links to what they already know. Pupils talk knowledgably about their learning. For example, one pupil in year 3 was able to connect his previous learning about biomes, in geography, when reading about Greenland. Teachers routinely check what pupils have remembered so that they know pupils are ready for new learning.

p.3

better?

The curriculum for the early years is well designed. There is an emphasis on developing children’s language and a love of reading. Teachers plan appropriate sequences of lessons to help children to learn the knowledge and skills they need. This helps them to be ready for the next stage in their learning. For example, teachers have provided additional opportunities for children to develop their fine motor skills to help them improve their letter formation and writing.

p.3

better?

The special educational needs coordinator (SENCo) is knowledgeable. She provides effective guidance for teachers. The needs of pupils with special educational needs and/or disabilities (SEND) are quickly identified. The SENCo and teachers work with parents to put suitable plans in place. These plans detail how pupils with SEND should be supported in lessons. As a result, pupils with SEND receive the right support to help them achieve as well as they should.

p.3

better?

Pupils behave well in lessons. A new behaviour policy and training have made sure that most staff manage behaviour in the same way and pupils know what to expect. Incidents of poor behaviour have decreased. Occasionally, some pupils do not behave as well at lunchtimes as they do in lessons. This is because a few staff who supervise pupils at lunchtime do not manage pupils’ behaviour consistently in line with the school’s behaviour policy.

p.3

better?

The governing body share leaders’ ambitions to improve the quality of education. They provide appropriate support and challenge to school leaders. They seek verification of the impact of leader’s actions to improve the school so that they can hold leaders to account.

p.3

better?

Staff confirmed that leaders are considerate of their workload. They appreciate the professional development opportunities provided for them.

p.3

Safeguarding

The arrangements for safeguarding are effective. 26–27 May 2021 Leaders ensure that staff have regular safeguarding training so they can identify if a pupil may be at risk of harm. Staff know how to report concerns. Leaders keep thorough safeguarding records. They work effectively with other agencies, such as social care, to ensure that families are well supported, and pupils are helped to stay safe.

p.3

Safeguarding

The curriculum is planned well so that pupils are taught how to manage risks to their safety. Pupils were able to explain how they would take steps to keep themselves safe when using the internet.

p.4

Safeguarding

Leaders ensure that appropriate checks are undertaken of staff who work in the school. Some minor administrative errors on the school’s single central register were corrected during the inspection.

p.4

(Information for the school and appropriate authority)

 In a few subjects, subject leaders have not had the time they need to check how well the curriculum is being implemented. Some of this work has been undertaken instead by the specialist leaders of education who have been supporting the school. This means that a few subject leaders are less clear about how to improve the curriculum in their subject area. Senior leaders should ensure that these subject leaders have the time they need to check that the curriculum is being implemented effectively.  Some staff at lunchtime do not use the school’s behaviour policy consistently. This means that, occasionally, some pupils’ behaviour at lunchtime is not as good as it is in the classroom. Leaders should make sure that lunchtime staff receive training so that they understand how to effectively manage pupils’ behaviour in line with the school’s behaviour policy.

p.4

How can I feed back my views?

or to find out what other parents and carers think. We use Ofsted Parent View information when deciding which schools to inspect, when to inspect them and as part of their inspection.

p.4

How can I feed back my views?

The Department for Education has further guidance on how to complain about a school.

p.4

How can I feed back my views?

If you are the school and you are not happy with the inspection or the report, you can complain to Ofsted . 26–27 May 2021

p.4

Further information

You can search for published performance information about the school here .

p.5

Further information

In the report, ‘disadvantaged pupils’ refers to those pupils who attract government pupil premium funding: pupils claiming free school meals at any point in the last six years and pupils in care or who left care through adoption or another formal route. 26–27 May 2021

p.5

School details

Inspection number 10184604 Type of school Primary

p.6

School details

Appropriate authority The governing body

p.6

School details

Date of previous inspection 18 March 2021, under section 8 of the Education Act 2005

p.6

Information about this school

 The executive headteacher began working at the school in March 2020.  The head of school was appointed in March 2020.

p.6

Information about this inspection

We carried out this inspection under section 8 of the Education Act 2005. We deemed the inspection a section 5 inspection under the same Act.

p.6

Information about this inspection

This was the first routine inspection the school received since the COVID-19 pandemic began. Inspectors discussed the impact of the pandemic with the school, and have taken that into account in their evaluation.

p.6

Information about this inspection

In accordance with section 13(4) of the Education Act 2005, Her Majesty’s Chief Inspector is of the opinion that the school no longer requires special measures.

p.6

Information about this inspection

 Inspectors held meetings with the executive headteacher and the head of school. We also met with the SENCo and carried out joint lesson visits. 26–27 May 2021  Inspectors did deep dives in reading, mathematics and geography. This involved meeting with curriculum subject leaders, visiting lessons, looking at pupils’ books and talking to pupils and teachers. Curriculum leaders were involved in all activities alongside inspectors. Additional curriculum plans were reviewed for other subjects.  Inspectors listened to pupils read to a familiar adult and visited phonics lessons.  The inspection team met with representatives from the governing body, including the chair of governors. Meetings were held with representatives from the local authority and the diocese.  Inspectors observed pupils’ behaviour throughout the school day, including during lessons, breaktimes and lunchtimes. The school’s safeguarding documentation

p.6

Information about this inspection

and the single central register were reviewed.  Inspectors considered governing body minutes, the school’s recently reviewed statement of action and records of monitoring.  The inspection team spoke with a number of parents at the start of the school day. Inspectors considered the 31 responses that were received through Ofsted’s Parent View questionnaire as well as the 17 free-text responses. Inspectors also considered the 19 responses that were received through the Ofsted questionnaire for staff.

p.7

Inspection team

Tim Scargill-Knight, lead inspector Her Majesty’s Inspector

p.7

Inspection team

Jean Watt Her Majesty’s Inspector 26–27 May 2021 regulates and inspects to achieve excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children’s social care, and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory and Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, further education and skills, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and other secure establishments. It assesses council children’s services, and inspects services for children looked after, safeguarding and child protection.

p.7

Inspection team

If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please telephone 0300 123 1231, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk .

p.8

Inspection team

You may reuse this information (not including logos) free of charge in any format or medium, under the terms of the Open Government Licence. To view this licence, visit www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-government-licence/ , write to the Information Policy Team, The National Archives, Kew, London TW9 4DU, or email: psi@nationalarchives.gsi.gov.uk .

p.8

Inspection team

Interested in our work? You can subscribe to our monthly newsletter for more information and updates: http://eepurl.com/iTrDn .

p.8

Inspection team

T: 0300 123 1231 Textphone: 0161 618 8524 E: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk W: www.gov.uk/ofsted

p.8

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion