Other · Ofsted report
Hills Bridge Services Ltd
Summary
What we read, and from where
Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.
- Inspection date verified
3 Jun 2021
- Inspectorssingle source
Rebecca Perry
- Postcode verified
RM13 8RA
- Name on report verified
Hills Bridge Services Ltd
- URN verified
2577255
Deep dive
What this report says
In plain English
Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.
Tone of the report
How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.
In line with other reports of this type.
How the report reads, start to finish
Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.
Strengths
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
No standout praise found.
Concerns
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
No strong criticism found.
Next steps
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
No next steps set out.
Anatomy of the report
How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.
- Pages
- 5
- Words of findings
- 16
- shorter than usual (typical 1049)
- Reading level
- —
- Average sentence
- 8 words
- Next steps
- 0
- typical 5
- Hedged sentences
- 0%
- “some”, “not always”, “most”…
Where the words go
Full report text
Hills Bridge Services Ltd Monitoring visit report
p.1
Name of lead inspector: Rebecca Perry, Her Majesty’s Inspector
p.1
Address:
Rainham House New Road Rainham Essex RM13 8RA Monitoring visit: Hills Bridge Services Ltd, 2–3 June 2021
p.1
Context and focus of visit
From October 2018, Ofsted undertook to carry out monitoring visits to all newly directly funded providers of apprenticeship training provision which began to be funded from April 2017 or after by ESFA and/or the apprenticeship levy. This monitoring visit was undertaken as part of those arrangements and as outlined in the ‘Further education and skills inspection handbook’, especially the sections entitled ‘Monitoring visits’ and ‘Monitoring visits to providers that are newly directly publicly funded’. The focus of these visits is on the themes set out below.
p.2
Context and focus of visit
Hills Bridge Services Ltd is an employer provider. At the time of the visit, there were 109 apprentices on the level 2 rail engineering operative apprenticeship standard. All apprentices were over the age of 18. Hills Bridge Services Ltd became an approved apprenticeship training provider in 2019. Leaders provide maintenance and repair services for a range of companies within the rail sector. Apprentices are recruited via referrals from a local prison and charitable organisations working with disadvantaged and vulnerable adults. Apprentices continued working and learning throughout the pandemic.
p.2
Context and focus of visit
The impact of COVID-19 (coronavirus) has been taken into account in the findings and progress judgements below.
p.2
Insufficient progress
Leaders have not ensured that the programme meets the principles and requirements of an apprenticeship. They have taken on learners who are not eligible for an apprenticeship. Leaders do not have appropriate commitment statements in place. Too many apprentices have never had a progress review, despite being on programme for over a year. Apprentices do not have workplace mentors.
p.2
Insufficient progress
Leaders have not considered functional skills within the programme. They are not aware of the proportion of apprentices who require these qualifications, and no apprentices have received teaching, or support, towards achieving these.
p.2
Insufficient progress
Apprentices do not complete their apprenticeship. Over half of the apprentices have finished their training and moved on to other employers without completing their final assessments. Leaders do not ensure that trainers continue to support these apprentices to retain and reinforce their learning, and they do not know how many Monitoring visit: Hills Bridge Services Ltd, 2–3 June 2021 will return for the assessments. Trainers and apprentices are not aware of the requirements of final assessments.
p.2
Insufficient progress
Arrangements for governance are not effective. Senior leaders are highly knowledgeable and experienced in the rail sector. However, they do not have sufficient knowledge or understanding of apprenticeships. They do not hold managers to account for the quality of the full apprenticeship programme. The new apprenticeship manager has identified accurately weaknesses in the provision. However, managers’ actions to remedy these have been too recently introduced to have had an impact.
p.3
Insufficient progress
Leaders monitor the quality of teaching and assessment effectively. Leaders use performance management appropriately to remedy staff underperformance. Trainers meet frequently to review the technical curriculum. They share strategies to successfully help apprentices who have fallen behind with the vocational aspects of their programme. Managers provide useful support for trainers to further develop their vocational and teaching skills.
p.3
Insufficient progress
Leaders ensure that the vocational curriculum is broad, and well informed by employer demands. Leaders have contracts for maintenance and repair work with a large range of different employers within the rail sector. These contracts inform the curriculum and enable apprentices to build their skills on site. They include many aspects of rail work, such as track-laying, track works, station repairs and heritage rail.
p.3
Reasonable progress
Apprentices quickly gain useful knowledge from working within the rail industry. They identify, describe and select the right tools for a variety of practical jobs. They understand the importance of, and can undertake, routine maintenance, for example the replacement of fishplates that hold rails together.
p.3
Reasonable progress
Trainers closely monitor apprentices’ progress in gaining new skills and knowledge. Apprentices gain the additional qualifications required to work in the rail industry. For example, the lookout qualification enables apprentices to hold higher levels of responsibility in managing health and safety in the workplace. They gain essential health and safety, manual handling, first-aid and rail-saw certificates. However, trainers do not monitor apprentices’ overall progress. Consequently, no apprentices have completed their full apprenticeship.
p.3
Reasonable progress
Trainers check apprentices’ knowledge effectively. They ask questions throughout practical activities to check apprentices’ understanding and to help apprentices extend their knowledge. They help apprentices consolidate theoretical knowledge in Monitoring visit: Hills Bridge Services Ltd, 2–3 June 2021 practical environments through their questioning, for example when asking apprentices to explain risks and to justify their chosen techniques.
p.3
Reasonable progress
Staff have extensive knowledge of the rail sector. They have many years’ experience working in different aspects of the sector between them. They maintain currency and licences to work track-side. Trainers have appropriate teaching and assessing qualifications.
p.4
Reasonable progress
Trainers sequence the vocational curriculum so that new knowledge and skills build on what apprentices know and can do. Trainers manage practical training skilfully. Trainers ensure that apprentices develop applied English and mathematical skills. For example, apprentices accurately complete calculations for the area of complex shapes and volumes related to their working context, such as to estimate quantities of concrete.
p.4
Reasonable progress
Trainers use their extensive knowledge of the industry to provide highly effective careers advice and guidance to apprentices. They ensure that apprentices understand the breadth of careers available within the rail sector, such as signalling, electrical or platform work. Apprentices also understand how their skills could transfer to other sectors, such as construction, welding, and painting and decorating. Despite not completing final assessments, apprentices progress to stable careers within the rail industry. Almost all remain with Hillsbridge as technicians or move into permanent roles with other large rail companies.
p.4
Insufficient progress
Leaders have not ensured that effective safeguarding arrangements are in place. No staff have received training in safeguarding or the ‘Prevent’ duty. Trainers do not understand their safeguarding responsibilities.
p.4
Insufficient progress
Staff do not deal with disclosures appropriately or know how to spot signs of vulnerability. Leaders do not log concerns about apprentices’ welfare and do not have arrangements in place for dealing with them.
p.4
Insufficient progress
Leaders do not follow safer recruitment practices. Leaders identify appropriate staff for Disclosure and Barring Service checks, but do not ensure that these are in place prior to staff working with vulnerable apprentices.
p.4
Insufficient progress
Apprentices do not know how to report concerns about their, or others’, well-being. They do not know about the risks of radicalisation and extremism or understand how these risks apply to them.
p.4
Insufficient progress
Apprentices work safely when they are track-side. They adhere to strict safe working practices. Apprentices have a particularly good understanding of health and safety. Monitoring visit: Hills Bridge Services Ltd, 2–3 June 2021 regulates and inspects to achieve excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children’s social care, and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory and Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, further education and skills, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and other secure establishments. It assesses council children’s services, and inspects services for children looked after, safeguarding and child protection.
p.4
Insufficient progress
If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please telephone 0300 123 1231, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk .
p.5
Insufficient progress
You may reuse this information (not including logos) free of charge in any format or medium, under the terms of the Open Government Licence. To view this licence, visit www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-government-licence/ , write to the Information Policy Team, The National Archives, Kew, London TW9 4DU, or email: psi@nationalarchives.gsi.gov.uk .
p.5
Insufficient progress
Interested in our work? You can subscribe to our monthly newsletter for more information and updates: http://eepurl.com/iTrDn .
p.5
Insufficient progress
T: 0300 123 1231 Textphone: 0161 618 8524 E: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk W: www.gov.uk/ofsted
p.5
Discuss this inspection
Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.
Join the discussion