Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Other · Ofsted letter

Setting

Inspected 11 May 2021 · published 9 Jul 2021

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

Chris Cook

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspection datesingle source

    11 May 2021

  • Inspectorssingle source

    Chris Cook

  • Postcode verified

    WF10 1PN

Page 1 of 4
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+61Positivemore positive than 87% of reports of this type

Reads more warmly than most reports of this type.

Praisehigh expectationsconfidentlyeffectiveconsistentlywell sequencedvery highstrongclear
Criticismrequires improvementnot securedelayed

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsWhat needs to improve positive critical
  • Findings1154w+61
  • What needs to improve186w0

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No strong criticism found.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
4
Words of findings
1,338
longer than usual (typical 963)
Reading level
Fairly hard
Flesch 53, typical 48
Average sentence
17 words
Next steps
8
typical 2
Hedged sentences
9%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 86%What needs to improve 14%

Full report text

Store Street Manchester M1 2WD T 0300 123 1231 www.gov.uk/ofsted

p.1

Delyth Roberts Castleford Three Lane Ends Academy Methley Road Castleford West Yorkshire WF10 1PN

p.1

Lane Ends Academy

Following my visit to your school on 11 May 2021, I write on behalf of Her Majesty’s Chief Inspector of Education, Children’s Services and Skills to confirm the monitoring inspection findings. Thank you for the help you gave during the inspection and for the time you made available to discuss the actions that have been taken to improve the school since the most recent section 5 inspection.

p.1

Lane Ends Academy

The monitoring inspection was carried out under section 8(2) of the Education Act 2005 and has taken place because the school has received two successive judgements of requires improvement at its previous section 5 inspections.

p.1

Lane Ends Academy

This was the first routine inspection the school received since the COVID-19 (coronavirus) pandemic began. I discussed the impact of the pandemic with you and have taken that into account in my evaluation.

p.1

Lane Ends Academy

Having considered the evidence, I am of the opinion that at this time:

p.1

Leaders and those responsible for governance are taking effective action

in order for the school to become a good school.

p.1

Leaders and those responsible for governance are taking effective action

The school should take further action to:

p.1

Leaders and those responsible for governance are taking effective action

 refine plans for subjects in the wider curriculum so that they include more detail about the knowledge pupils will cover in each subject in each year group  develop plans for relationships and sex education in consultation with parents.

p.1

Context

During the periods when schools were only open to some children due to COVID-19 restrictions, the work completed by pupils learning at home closely mirrored that of their peers in school. Most of the school’s usual curriculum was taught. However, certain elements were covered in a different order. For example, a topic on the Holocaust was avoided and taught when the school opened to all pupils.

p.2

Context

The COVID-19 pandemic has also had an impact on leaders’ plans for school improvement. For example, not all the work that was planned on the curriculum has been completed.

p.2

Context

There have been several changes to staffing since the last section 5 inspection in November 2019. An assistant headteacher was promoted to become a deputy headteacher, and seven new teachers have joined the school.

p.2

Main findings

Leaders articulate the high expectations they have for their pupils. The appointment of new staff and training have increased leadership capacity. You are now able to confidently delegate many of the responsibilities you initially held. You have clear plans and are working systematically to improve the quality of education across the school. Although the COVID-19 pandemic has delayed the implementation of some of your plans, you are determined to be back on track before the start of the next school year.

p.2

Main findings

Governors know the school well. This is because they receive a wealth of information from leaders at all levels. In more normal times they visit school to check the validity of this information, but this has not been possible over the last year. However, now that all pupils have returned to school, they are beginning to gather the views of pupils remotely. Governors have supported leaders with staffing changes. They check the impact of leaders’ actions and challenge them to make sure that improvements are made in a timely manner.

p.2

Main findings

Following the last section 5 inspection, you were tasked with improving your curriculum. During this inspection I checked the impact of your work on this by looking closely at science and history. In science, plans are well sequenced and clearly show the knowledge, skills and vocabulary that pupils should learn in each year group. Pupils say that they enjoy their science lessons, even though they sometimes find them hard. They can talk confidently about their learning. Their recall of facts from previous topics is accurate. For example, a Year 1 pupil was able to list the planets in the right order according to their distance from the sun.

p.2

Main findings

Your work on the history curriculum is at an earlier stage of development. Your plans cover the requirements of the national curriculum. You have considered the key concepts, such as parliament, you want pupils to deepen their understanding of as they move through the school. Pupils are able to say that history is about the past. They can remember the titles of some of the topics they have studied and some of the key people, for example Ancient Greece and Cleopatra. However, their knowledge is not secure. More work needs to be done to add details to your plans so that the knowledge pupils should learn in each year group is clearly identified.

p.2

Main findings

Your curriculum is broad but plans for subjects in the wider curriculum are at an early stage of development. Plans to meet the requirements to deliver relationships and sex education from September 2021 are not in place.

p.3

Main findings

Following the last section 5 inspection, you were also asked to improve the teaching of early reading. You have made sure that reading has a very high priority. The consistent implementation of a relatively new phonics programme is having an impact on pupils in the early stages of learning to read. The books that pupils are asked to read in school and at home are well matched to the sounds they know. Teachers and teaching assistants are well trained. This has helped to ensure the weakest readers in all year groups are receiving effective support to become fluent readers.

p.3

Main findings

In addition, you were asked to improve the quality of provision for pupils with special educational needs and/or disabilities (SEND). You have developed new policies and procedures to identify the needs of these pupils and to provide support. Each pupil with SEND has an individual support plan which is regularly reviewed. Parents are involved at every stage. The SEND coordinator is determined to make sure that all pupils get the support they need. Strong links have been made with the local authority. This has given staff access to training and made sure pupils now have additional support from a wide range of professionals.

p.3

Main findings

You were also asked to eliminate the boisterous behaviour of some pupils on the playground. You have updated your behaviour policy. You constantly check that it is implemented consistently by all staff in all situations. Pupils have responded well to these increased expectations. Although there are still incidents of inappropriate behaviour on the playground, these are now rare. Of the parents who responded to Ofsted’s online questionnaire, Parent View, 83% said that the school makes sure pupils are well behaved. On the day of this inspection, no inappropriate behaviour was seen.

p.3

Additional support

The multi-academy trust has given the school support with phonics and the curriculum. The trust has facilitated phonics training for teachers and teaching assistants. As a result, phonics is delivered consistently across the school. The trust has also trained and supported subject leaders in the development of the curriculum. These leaders now have a clear understanding of how to lead improvements across the school in their subjects. The multi-academy trust has also carried out monitoring activities and challenged leaders to check that improvements are taking place at an appropriate pace.

p.3

Additional support

The local authority has supported the school to improve their work with pupils with SEND. As a result, leaders have developed systems and procedures that are helping teachers and teaching assistants to provide these pupils with effective support.

p.4

Evidence

During the inspection, I held meetings with the headteacher, curriculum leaders, the SEND coordinator, the multi-academy trust chief executive officer, the multi- academy primary director, pupils and representatives of those responsible for governance to discuss the actions taken since the last inspection.

p.4

Evidence

I looked at improvement plans, self-evaluation documents, minutes of governing body meetings, curriculum plans and pupils’ work. I observed all areas of the school during lesson times and breaks. I also considered 41 responses to Ofsted’s online survey, Parent View, including the eight free-text responses.

p.4

Evidence

I am copying this letter to the chair of the board of trustees, and the chief executive officer of the Castleford multi-academy trust, the regional schools commissioner and the director of children’s services for Wakefield. This letter will be published on the Ofsted reports website.

p.4

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion