Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Other · Ofsted report

London College Of Global Education Ltd.

Inspected 4 Jun 2021 · published 8 Jul 2021 · URN 2626822

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

Mike Finn

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspection date verified

    4 Jun 2021

  • Inspectorssingle source

    Mike Finn

  • Postcode verified

    IG11 8EQ

  • Name on report verified

    London College of Global Education Ltd

  • URN verified

    2626822

Page 1 of 5
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

−42Criticalmore positive than 8% of reports of this type

Reads more critically than most reports of this type.

Praiseweaknesseseffectiveconfidentsafefeel safeindependentsecure
Criticismnot effectivelytoo ofteninsufficientnot sufficientlyconcernslacktoo fewbelow

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

Findings positive critical

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No standout praise found.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
5
Words of findings
1,204
about usual (typical 1049)
Reading level
Hard
Flesch 41, typical 45
Average sentence
18 words
Next steps
1
typical 5
Hedged sentences
2%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 100%

Full report text

London College of Global Education Ltd Monitoring visit report

p.1

Name of lead inspector: Mike Finn, Her Majesty’s Inspector

p.1

Type of provider: Independent learning provider

p.1

Address: 4th Floor, Suite No 3 The Clock House East Street Barking London IG11 8EQ Monitoring visit: London College of Global Education, 3–4 June 2021

p.1

Context and focus of visit

From October 2018, Ofsted undertook to carry out monitoring visits to all newly directly funded providers of apprenticeship training provision which began to be funded from April 2017 or after by the Education and Skills Funding Agency and/or the apprenticeship levy. This monitoring visit was undertaken as part of those arrangements and as outlined in the ‘Further education and skills inspection handbook’, especially the sections entitled ‘Monitoring visits’ and ‘Monitoring visits to providers that are newly directly publicly funded’. The focus of these visits is on the themes set out below.

p.2

Context and focus of visit

London College of Global Education Ltd offers apprenticeships predominantly in the occupational areas of healthcare, digital marketing and accounting. At the time of the visit there were 24 apprentices on level 2 to 5 standards. The college started doing private training courses in 2010, and received funding for apprentices in 2020. The first apprentices started in August 2020. All off-the-job teaching is done remotely.

p.2

Context and focus of visit

The impact of COVID-19 (coronavirus) has been taken into account in the findings and progress judgements below.

p.2

Insufficient progress

Until recently, leaders have not identified the weaknesses of the provision. They have plans, at an early stage of implementation, to improve their overview of the quality of the training. However, these plans are not precise enough, nor are they having a beneficial impact on the experience of apprentices.

p.2

Insufficient progress

Leaders do not have adequate oversight of the recruitment of apprentices into their programmes. Inspectors found examples of people on the list of apprentices who were not studying at the provider. Inspectors also found apprentices enrolled on programmes in subjects in which they already hold qualifications at a higher level than the apprenticeship. As a result, these apprentices do not learn substantial new knowledge.

p.2

Insufficient progress

Leaders have ensured that tutors either have relevant industry experience, or qualifications in education, training or assessing. As a result, they have the expertise necessary to deliver training. However, leaders have not ensured that they provide staff with development opportunities to help them improve in their teaching or Monitoring visit: London College of Global Education, 3–4 June 2021 assessment roles. Apprentices told inspectors that high staff turnover also has a detrimental impact on their training.

p.2

Insufficient progress

Leaders do not communicate effectively with employers. Too often, employers have not heard from leaders for several months, and few have a chance to be involved in the development of their apprentices’ learning programme. As a result, employers find it hard to support apprentices with their learning.

p.3

Insufficient progress

Leaders and staff do not have sufficient oversight of apprentices’ attendance at training sessions or of the progress that apprentices make. In their reviews of apprentices’ progress, staff do not record accurately for each apprentice what they have learned, and what remains to be learned. For each reporting period, records of reviews are identical for apprentices within the same cohort, with no personalisation of information. Leaders, staff and employers do not have reliable information about apprentices’ progress.

p.3

Insufficient progress

Staff have not ensured that apprentices know that they are on an apprenticeship programme. Apprentices have received insufficient advice and guidance about the components of their courses. As a result, apprentices do not fully understand the requirements of the apprenticeship programme and, in a few instances, they do not know the duration of their course.

p.3

Insufficient progress

Tutors do not sequence the curriculum well enough or give sufficient consideration to what apprentices need to know to be effective in their roles, especially early in the apprenticeship. For example, in healthcare programmes tutors teach the key topics that are fundamental to apprentices’ jobs, such as safeguarding and infection control, too late in the course.

p.3

Insufficient progress

Staff do not have a sufficient understanding of what apprentices know or can do at the start of the course. They do not adequately assess apprentices’ prior vocational knowledge, or their knowledge of, and ability to use, English and mathematics. As a result, tutors do not plan or teach training programmes tailored to each apprentices’ needs and job requirements. Apprentices do not sufficiently improve on their skills, knowledge or behaviours.

p.3

Insufficient progress

Tutors do not use assessment effectively enough to check what apprentices have learned, or to give them feedback so that they can improve. Apprentices raised a variety of concerns with inspectors, including a lack of assessment at all, assessments for which they had not received feedback for a considerable time, and confusion over the requirements of assessments and of submission dates which were not clearly set. As a result, apprentices are unclear about the progress they are making, and what they can do to improve. Monitoring visit: London College of Global Education, 3–4 June 2021 Apprentices have frequent contact with their tutors, either through online lessons or progress reviews. They feel confident that they can contact their tutor by e-mail at any time. As a result, they feel supported by their tutors.

p.3

Insufficient progress

Leaders do not follow their own process to ensure that staff they recruit are suitable to work with their apprentices. For example, they do not obtain references from previous employers or undertake disclosure and barring service checks before confirming employment. Consequently, they have not checked the suitability of their staff.

p.4

Insufficient progress

The designated safeguarding lead has received appropriate training to support them in their safeguarding role. However, leaders do not record safeguarding training for staff.

p.4

Insufficient progress

Leaders do not ensure that tutors teach apprentices about how to keep themselves safe. For example, in level 3 health programmes, apprentices only learn about their duty to safeguard others. As a result, too few learners can recall training about how to keep themselves safe.

p.4

Insufficient progress

Leaders have not considered the risks of radicalisation or extremism to apprentices, or planned how to mitigate these. As a result, they are not meeting the requirements of the ‘Prevent’ duty.

p.4

Insufficient progress

Learners feel safe when attending online learning sessions. Monitoring visit: London College of Global Education, 3–4 June 2021 regulates and inspects to achieve excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children’s social care, and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory and Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, further education and skills, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and other secure establishments. It assesses council children’s services, and inspects services for children looked after, safeguarding and child protection.

p.4

Insufficient progress

If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please telephone 0300 123 1231, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk .

p.5

Insufficient progress

You may reuse this information (not including logos) free of charge in any format or medium, under the terms of the Open Government Licence. To view this licence, visit www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-government-licence/ , write to the Information Policy Team, The National Archives, Kew, London TW9 4DU, or email: psi@nationalarchives.gsi.gov.uk .

p.5

Insufficient progress

Interested in our work? You can subscribe to our monthly newsletter for more information and updates: http://eepurl.com/iTrDn .

p.5

Insufficient progress

T: 0300 123 1231 Textphone: 0161 618 8524 E: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk W: www.gov.uk/ofsted

p.5

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion