Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Other · Ofsted letter

Setting

Inspected 18 May 2021 · published 6 Jul 2021

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

Di Mullan

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspection datesingle source

    18 May 2021

  • Inspectorssingle source

    Di Mullan

  • Postcode verified

    LE11 5UJ

Page 1 of 4
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+31Mostly positivemore positive than 66% of reports of this type

In line with other reports of this type.

Praiseambitiousconfidentlyenjoylovepreciselypreciseswiftlyclear
Criticismrequires improvementdelayednot clear

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsWhat needs to improve positive critical
  • Findings1026w+39
  • What needs to improve145w−14

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No standout praise found.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No strong criticism found.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
4
Words of findings
1,169
about usual (typical 963)
Reading level
Plain English
Flesch 60, typical 48
Average sentence
15 words
Next steps
6
typical 2
Hedged sentences
12%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 88%What needs to improve 12%

Full report text

Store Street Manchester M1 2WD T 0300 123 1231 www.gov.uk/ofsted

p.1

Jon Bishop Headteacher Robert Bakewell Primary School Barsby Drive Loughborough Leicestershire LE11 5UJ

p.1

Primary School

Following my visit to your school on 18 May 2021, I write on behalf of Her Majesty’s Chief Inspector of Education, Children’s Services and Skills to confirm the monitoring inspection findings. Thank you for the help you gave during the inspection and for the time you made available to discuss the actions that have been taken to improve the school since the most recent section 5 inspection.

p.1

Primary School

The monitoring inspection was carried out under section 8(2) of the Education Act 2005 and has taken place because the school has received two successive judgements of requires improvement at its previous section 5 inspections.

p.1

Primary School

This was the first routine inspection the school received since the COVID-19 (coronavirus) pandemic began. I discussed the impact of the pandemic with you and have taken that into account in my evaluation.

p.1

Primary School

Having considered the evidence, I am of the opinion that at this time:

p.1

Leaders and those responsible for governance are taking effective action

in order for the school to become a good school. The school should take further action to:

p.1

Leaders and those responsible for governance are taking effective action

 ensure that every subject plan sets out precisely what pupils should learn and when they should learn it  implement a strategy to ensure that pupils remember, in the long term, the most important knowledge that they are taught in all subjects.

p.2

Context

Since the inspection in March 2019, five new governors and six teachers have been appointed. Nine teachers, some of whom had been employed on a part-time basis, have left the school.

p.2

Context

Ofsted undertook a remote monitoring inspection of the school in February 2021. There have been no changes to staffing since that time.

p.2

Context

While leaders have laid out their plans for improvement, the COVID-19 (coronavirus) pandemic has impacted on some of these plans. This has meant that some training and actions have been temporarily delayed.

p.2

Main findings

Since the last inspection, leaders have taken steps to improve the curriculum. They consulted with parents, staff and pupils. They considered the needs and interests of the pupils who attend the school. Leaders are developing a curriculum that aims to be ambitious for all pupils, including those with special educational needs and/or disabilities (SEND).

p.2

Main findings

Leaders have changed the arrangements for subject leadership. Subject leaders work in teams. Each team has oversight of a range of subjects. For example, ‘Creativity and Expression’ includes reading, writing, art and music. ‘Innovation and Enterprise’ includes science, mathematics, computing and design technology. Subject leaders have planned out when teachers will cover each part of the national curriculum.

p.2

Main findings

However, subject plans are at different stages of development. All subject plans span the whole school from the early years through to Year 6. Some subjects, such as science, set out what pupils must learn and the order in which they should learn it. This includes the most important vocabulary that pupils must understand and remember. Not all subject plans are this precise.

p.2

Main findings

Subject leaders have set out what they need to do to improve the curriculum in their subject. This information forms part of the school’s overall plans for improvement. Leaders have started to create documents for teachers that provide support for their subject knowledge. Subject leaders have begun to check more closely what is being taught in each class. Leaders are hopeful that, with the easing of COVID-19 restrictions, staff will now be able to work more closely together. This will mean that they can sharply and swiftly develop their subject plans and check that their plans are implemented well.

p.2

Main findings

At the start and end of each ‘topic’ of work, teachers talk to pupils about what they know and what they can remember. Pupils talk confidently about the different ways that teachers help them to remember what they have learned, such as times tables and spellings. However, leaders have not introduced a clear strategy to help pupils remember in the long term the most important knowledge, in subjects other than English and mathematics.

p.3

Main findings

The teaching of reading is a high priority. Leaders have recently purchased new books for pupils to read. These books are matched to the sounds pupils are learning. Staff have received training in phonics, and this is taught daily. Teachers read to pupils regularly. Pupils’ good attendance is rewarded by the headteacher coming to read to the class. Pupils told me that they enjoy this reward. They value the time the headteacher spends with them, sharing the books that he enjoys. Leaders plan to build a library as part of their drive to promote a love of reading. They have recently planned which novels each class will study. Over the course of their time at the school, pupils will study a range of different types of books.

p.3

Main findings

Leaders have taken steps to improve the indoor environment of the school. Pupils say that their lessons are calm, and they are able to concentrate. Pupils move around school sensibly. In class, pupils pay attention to their teachers and get on with their work.

p.3

Main findings

Following the inspection of March 2019, leaders took steps to involve parents more in the life of the school. Leaders introduced ‘drop-in’ sessions and coffee mornings. These were becoming established but have been stopped due to COVID-19 restrictions. Leaders hope to reintroduce these events in the future.

p.3

Main findings

Governors have a clear understanding of the current priorities of the school. Like leaders, they know that while steps have been taken to improve the quality of education, there is still work to do. In common with all staff, they express a determination to ensure that the curriculum for all pupils, including those with SEND, is an ambitious one.

p.3

Additional support

Some leaders have undertaken national training in subject leadership. All subject leaders have received training from an external consultant in how to develop a curriculum. This has included leaders understanding published research into how pupils learn. These leaders have started to put this into practice as they rewrite the plans for their subjects.

p.3

Evidence

During the inspection, I held meetings with the headteacher, the deputy headteacher, four subject leaders and seven other members of staff to discuss actions taken since the last inspection.

p.4

Evidence

I held a meeting with two governors, one of whom is the chair of the governing body. I visited phonics lessons, and a range of other lessons, with the headteacher and I listened to three pupils reading to a familiar adult. I spoke with a group of six pupils about school life and their learning. I examined the single central record. Alongside the headteacher and deputy headteacher, I examined the school’s curriculum plans, curriculum files and plans for improvement. I took account of the 77 responses to Ofsted’s online questionnaire, Parent View, and the 38 responses to Ofsted’s staff questionnaire. I spoke by telephone with an external consultant who has been providing training for staff.

p.4

Evidence

I am copying this letter to the chair of the governing body, the regional schools commissioner and the director of children’s services for Leicestershire. This letter will be published on the Ofsted reports website.

p.4

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion