Other · Ofsted letter
Setting
Summary
What we read, and from where
Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.
- Inspection datesingle source
10 Jun 2021
- Inspectorssingle source
Yasmin Maskatiya
- Postcode verified
SO41 8HX
Deep dive
What this report says
In plain English
Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.
Tone of the report
How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.
In line with other reports of this type.
How the report reads, start to finish
Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.
Strengths
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
Concerns
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
No strong criticism found.
Next steps
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- in order for the school to become a good school. p.1
- ensure that the curriculum plans for all foundation subjects are clear about the key knowledge that pupils should learn and how that knowledge is strengthened over time p.1
- train and support middle leaders so that they are expert in devising, implementing and evaluating the impact of the curriculum plans p.1
- improve the teachers’ subject knowledge and help all teachers become expert in the delivery of the curriculum. p.1
- Since the last inspection, the school has appointed a new special educational needs coordinator. p.2
What the report dwells on
Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.
Anatomy of the report
How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.
- Pages
- 3
- Words of findings
- 867
- about usual (typical 963)
- Reading level
- Fairly hard
- Flesch 53, typical 48
- Average sentence
- 16 words
- Next steps
- 5
- typical 2
- Hedged sentences
- 7%
- “some”, “not always”, “most”…
Where the words go
Full report text
Store Street Manchester M1 2WD T 0300 123 1231 www.gov.uk/ofsted
p.1
Kirstie Richards Headteacher Pennington Church of England Junior School Priestlands Road Pennington Lymington Hampshire SO41 8HX
p.1
of England Junior School
Following my visit to your school on 10 June 2021, I write on behalf of Her Majesty's Chief Inspector of Education, Children's Services and Skills to confirm the monitoring inspection findings. Thank you for the help you gave during the inspection and for the time you made available to discuss the actions that have been taken to improve the school since the most recent section 5 inspection.
p.1
of England Junior School
The monitoring inspection was carried out under section 8(2) of the Education Act 2005 and has taken place because the school has received two successive judgements of requires improvement at its previous section 5 inspections.
p.1
of England Junior School
This was the first routine inspection the school received since the COVID-19 (coronavirus) pandemic began. I discussed the impact of the pandemic with the school and have taken that into account in my evaluation.
p.1
of England Junior School
Having considered the evidence, I am of the opinion that at this time:
p.1
Leaders and those responsible for governance are taking effective action
in order for the school to become a good school.
p.1
Leaders and those responsible for governance are taking effective action
The school should take further action to:
p.1
Leaders and those responsible for governance are taking effective action
ensure that the curriculum plans for all foundation subjects are clear about the key knowledge that pupils should learn and how that knowledge is strengthened over time train and support middle leaders so that they are expert in devising, implementing and evaluating the impact of the curriculum plans improve the teachers’ subject knowledge and help all teachers become expert in the delivery of the curriculum.
p.1
Context
Since the last inspection, the school has appointed a new special educational needs coordinator.
p.2
Main findings
You have kept the improvement of the curriculum firmly at the centre of the school’s work. The impact of COVID-19 has meant that some planned changes have been either slowed or delayed. Nonetheless, you have continued to make progress in the development of reading and mathematics. You and your staff have also focused well on pupils’ behaviour. Staff understand that pupils’ strong attitudes toward learning help them make better progress.
p.2
Main findings
The reading strategy in the school is stronger than it was. You have invested heavily in training all teachers to teach phonics. This is principally to help younger pupils read more fluently. Older pupils also start their reading lessons with a phonics-based activity. This helps pupils’ spelling. However, sometimes the activities go on for too long and pupils have less time to spend on more challenging work.
p.2
Main findings
You are creating a culture of reading in the school. Pupils read regularly, both in class and independently. Younger readers who are not yet fluent are well supported in their reading. They make strong progress, including pupils with special educational needs and/or disabilities. By Year 6 even the weakest readers are able to read well.
p.2
Main findings
The changes in mathematics are at an earlier stage but there is evidence of improved learning already. Staff have completed training which has improved the accuracy of their teaching. For example, inspectors saw a focused and clear approach to the teaching of fractions. The pupils were able to use the methods they had learned to calculate fractions. Most pupils were also able to confidently explain the method.
p.2
Main findings
You and your leaders have put in place a curriculum plan that maps out the sequencing of all subjects in each year. You have put a great deal of thought into this. However, as yet, the plans do not fully identify how the knowledge in each subject builds over time. You have not considered carefully enough what the learning in each subject is ultimately leading to. Teachers require additional training to help them deliver the foundation subjects successfully and consistently.
p.2
Main findings
Governors have helped to bring about improvement by offering a strong balance of challenge and support. They are knowledgeable about the schools’ strengths and weaknesses. However, a barrier to achieving further progress is whether there is sufficient expertise among leaders. Greater middle leader capacity is needed to bring about the required changes.
p.3
Additional support
The Solent Mathematics hub has worked with staff at the school to support them in their planning and delivery of mathematics. The training has been instrumental in helping teachers to teach mathematical concepts in a clear and consistent way. The local authority has supported the school through its local learning partner. However, during the inspection, it became clear that the school requires further specialised assistance to support the resource base unit. The local authority has pledged this immediate support for those pupils with social, emotional and mental health needs.
p.3
Evidence
During the inspection, I held meetings with the headteacher, other senior leaders, pupils, representatives of those responsible for governance, representatives of the local authority and the diocese to discuss the actions taken since the last inspection.
p.3
Evidence
I had discussions with pupils and staff, visited lessons and looked at pupils’ work. I considered the responses to Ofsted’s online questionnaire, Parent View, including 28 free text responses. I also took account of 16 staff questionnaires.
p.3
Evidence
I am copying this letter to the chair of the governing body, the director of education for the Diocese of Winchester, the regional schools commissioner and the director of children's services for Hampshire. This letter will be published on the Ofsted reports website.
p.3
Discuss this inspection
Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.
Join the discussion