Other · Ofsted letter
Setting
Summary
What we read, and from where
Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.
- Inspection datesingle source
20 May 2021
- Inspectorssingle source
Adam Vincent
- Postcode verified
N1 7HA
Deep dive
What this report says
In plain English
Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.
Tone of the report
How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.
Reads more critically than most reports of this type.
How the report reads, start to finish
Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.
Strengths
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
No standout praise found.
Concerns
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
Next steps
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
What the report dwells on
Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.
Leadership & governance11
“Leaders reported that the incidents of low-level disruption have declined.” p.3Teaching & assessment8
“Teachers’ expectations of what pupils can achieve are not ambitious.” p.2Progress & outcomes4
“However, progress in implementing the new curriculum is too slow.” p.2
Anatomy of the report
How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.
- Pages
- 3
- Words of findings
- 902
- about usual (typical 963)
- Reading level
- Hard
- Flesch 49, typical 48
- Average sentence
- 16 words
- Next steps
- 3
- typical 2
- Hedged sentences
- 10%
- “some”, “not always”, “most”…
Where the words go
Full report text
Store Street Manchester M1 2WD T 0300 123 1231 www.gov.uk/ofsted
p.1
Caroline King Executive Headteacher Thomas Fairchild Community School Forston Street Hoxton London N1 7HA
p.1
Community School
Following my visit to your school on 20 May 2021, I write on behalf of Her Majesty's Chief Inspector of Education, Children's Services and Skills to confirm the monitoring inspection findings. Thank you for the help you gave during the inspection and for the time you made available to discuss the actions that have been taken to improve the school since the most recent section 5 inspection.
p.1
Community School
The monitoring inspection was carried out under section 8(2) of the Education Act 2005 and has taken place because the school has received two successive judgements of requires improvement at its previous section 5 inspections.
p.1
Community School
This was the first routine inspection the school received since the COVID-19 (coronavirus) pandemic began. I discussed the impact of the pandemic with you and have taken that into account in my evaluation.
p.1
Community School
Having considered the evidence, I am of the opinion that at this time:
p.1
Leaders and those responsible for governance are not taking effective
action in order for the school to become a good school .
p.1
Leaders and those responsible for governance are not taking effective
The school should take further action to:
p.1
Leaders and those responsible for governance are not taking effective
ensure that teachers have the subject knowledge and skills to be able to implement the planned curriculum in all subjects raise teachers’ expectations of what all pupils can achieve across the curriculum ensure that the new behaviour policy is applied consistently by all staff, in and out of the classroom, to further reduce incidents of poor behaviour.
p.1
Context
Leaders have needed to restructure staffing across the school due to a fall in the number of pupils on roll. As a result, a significant number of staff have left. Following the national lockdowns, pupils’ attendance has returned to pre-COVID levels.
p.2
Context
The local authority and the governing body have decided to de-federate the school from the Soaring Skies federation. There is a shared understanding that Thomas Fairchild has not improved quickly enough following the previous inspection in 2020. The local authority is looking for the school to join another federation of local schools.
p.2
Main findings
You and the leadership team have not ensured that the areas for improvement identified at the previous inspection in February 2020 have been addressed sufficiently well. Leaders have improved curriculum plans in all subjects. However, the new curriculum is not being taught as well as it should be across the school. This is preventing pupils from knowing and remembering more in a range of subjects.
p.2
Main findings
COVID-19 restrictions have further slowed your plans for improvement. This includes providing staff with training to teach all aspects of the new curriculum effectively.
p.2
Main findings
Leaders have worked with a partner school to develop a new mathematics curriculum. Staff have received training from the partner school and the local authority to improve their teaching of mathematics. However, progress in implementing the new curriculum is too slow. Teachers are not checking thoroughly what pupils already know in mathematics. They are not building up pupils’ mathematical knowledge well. Some pupils have become disengaged with their learning.
p.2
Main findings
Subject leaders have written well-sequenced curriculum plans for all subjects. However, leaders have not ensured that staff are fully trained to implement the new plans. Although the plans set out what subject content pupils should learn, they have not been implemented well across the school. Some teachers do not have the subject knowledge needed to teach all aspects of the curriculum effectively. Teachers’ expectations of what pupils can achieve are not ambitious. Gaps in learning for those pupils with special educational needs and/or disabilities are not being closed effectively. Staff’s expectations of pupils’ behaviour are not consistently high. During lessons, some pupils participate in low-level disruption. For example, some pupils talk when the teacher is talking and some swing on their chairs. Pupils do not focus fully on their learning and this stands in the way of them achieving well. Furthermore,
p.2
Main findings
incidents of poor behaviour sometimes go unchallenged by staff in the playground. This was also an issue at the previous inspection in February 2020.
p.3
Main findings
Leaders have revised the behaviour policy with a focus on positively reinforcing and rewarding good behaviour. Leaders reported that the incidents of low-level disruption have declined. The number of fixed-term exclusions has also reduced this year. Nevertheless, you recognise that pupils’ behaviour has to improve further.
p.3
Additional support
You have drawn on support from the other school in the Soaring Skies federation to provide a model for the delivery of the curriculum. However, despite the training staff have received, weaknesses in the implementation of the curriculum remain a barrier to all pupils achieving well.
p.3
Additional support
The local authority has been providing regular monitoring visits and support. It has also been working closely with the governing body to identify areas for development and plan for the future direction of the school.
p.3
Evidence
During the inspection, I held meetings with you and the head of school. I also met with other senior leaders, staff and pupils. Meetings were held with representatives of the local authority and representatives of those responsible for governance to discuss the actions taken since the last inspection.
p.3
Evidence
I visited lessons, listened to pupils read, spoke with staff and pupils, and looked at examples of pupils’ work. I looked at documents and the outcomes of leaders’ monitoring activities.
p.3
Evidence
I am copying this letter to the chair of the governing body, the regional schools commissioner and the director of children's services for Hackney. This letter will be published on the Ofsted reports website.
p.3
Discuss this inspection
Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.
Join the discussion