Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Schools & FE · School monitoring visit

Setting

Inspected — · published 5 Jul 2021

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

Karl Sampson (lead), Caroline Dulon

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspectorssingle source

    Caroline Dulon, Karl Sampson

  • Postcode verified

    BS48 4PD

Page 1 of 5
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+47Positivemore positive than 82% of reports of this type

In line with other reports of this type.

Praiseoutstandingstronginspirationalhigh expectationspositiveambitioushigh-qualityeffective
Criticismconcernsweaknessesnot yetdisruptionnot clear

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsAbout the inspectionLeadership positive critical
  • Findings145w0
  • Leadership1012w+47

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
5
Words of findings
1,157
shorter than usual (typical 1570)
Reading level
Fairly hard
Flesch 52, typical 47
Average sentence
15 words
Next steps
2
typical 8
Hedged sentences
3%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 12%Leadership 85%About the inspection 3%

Full report text

Store Street Manchester M1 2WD T 0300 123 1231 www.gov.uk/ofsted

p.1

Catherine Hunt Headteacher St Francis Catholic Primary School Station Road Nailsea Somerset BS48 4PD

p.1

Primary School

Following my visit with Karl Sampson, Her Majesty’s Inspector (HMI), to your school on 8 and 9 June 2021, I write on behalf of Her Majesty’s Chief Inspector of Education, Children’s Services and Skills to confirm the outcome and inspection findings. Thank you for the help you gave during the inspection and for the time you made available to discuss the actions that have been taken since the school’s most recent section 5 inspection.

p.1

Primary School

The inspection was the first monitoring inspection since the school was judged to have serious weaknesses in January 2020. It was carried out under section 8 of the Education Act 2005.

p.1

Primary School

This was the first routine inspection the school received since the COVID-19 (coronavirus) pandemic began. We discussed the impact of the pandemic with you and have taken that into account in our evaluation.

p.1

Primary School

Having considered all the evidence, I am of the opinion that at this time:

p.1

Leaders and managers are taking effective actions towards the removal of

The local authority’s statement of action is not fit for purpose.

p.1

Leaders and managers are taking effective actions towards the removal of

The school’s action plans are fit for purpose. I am copying this letter to the chair of the governing body, the director of education for the Diocese of Clifton, the regional schools commissioner and the director of children’s services for North Somerset. This letter will be published on the Ofsted reports website.

p.1

Context

One class teacher has returned from maternity leave.

p.3

Context

In February 2021, at the additional monitoring inspection, inspectors judged that safeguarding was effective.

p.3

designation

Leaders are beginning to tackle the school’s weaknesses with greater confidence and rigour. As the school’s leadership team is small, the external support provided by the mentor headteacher has been instrumental in enabling this progress. The governing body are also playing their part. A new committee structure enables governors to be much more well informed. They know the priorities for improvement and the challenges that leaders are facing. As a result, governors are well placed to check that you are implementing the school’s action plans to secure further improvement.

p.3

designation

You have sustained improvements to safeguarding. There is now an even stronger culture of vigilance. Staff report concerns promptly and in appropriate detail. Leaders are piecing information together to help them gain a wider and more detailed understanding of the welfare of vulnerable pupils. They take prompt and suitable action, involving other professionals appropriately, to address any concerns. The governor responsible for safeguarding makes regular checks to ensure that staff understand procedures and that leaders’ actions are in line with the school’s policy.

p.3

designation

Low-level disruption in the classroom is no longer a concern. Teachers now set high expectations for pupils’ behaviour and pupils follow these. In lessons, pupils listen carefully and take greater responsibility for their learning. Pupils say that they are now able to concentrate on their work and that this has made learning ‘much easier and better’.

p.3

designation

Rightly, leaders have started to focus more on developing the curriculum. In mathematics, work is further advanced than in other subjects. The mathematics leader has taken the next steps to build a strong programme of learning. She has set out clearly the knowledge that pupils should learn in each year group in a new calculations policy. Pupils’ work shows that they are working towards ambitious goals and that teachers provide them with plenty of opportunities to practise. Consequently, pupils know and remember more in mathematics.

p.3

designation

In English, leaders have recently introduced new plans to develop pupils’ writing, including their spelling, grammar and punctuation. There is now a clear sequence of learning in place for pupils to help them to know and remember more as they move from Year 1 to Year 6. Teachers have implemented these plans. The older pupils are using their improved grammatical knowledge to write effectively.

p.3

designation

The science leader has taken important first steps to improve pupils’ learning. She has ensured that pupils have regular science lessons and that the content of the national curriculum is taught in a logical sequence across the school. She rightly recognises the need to identify the essential knowledge in science that pupils must know and remember in each year group.

p.4

designation

Curriculum planning and development in other subjects are at an early stage. Leaders have not yet set out their aims for the curriculum as a whole. They have not identified the essential learning in each subject, apart from mathematics and science, in every year group. It is also not clear how pupils will build and remember this knowledge as they move through the school.

p.4

designation

Leaders are providing teachers with some helpful professional development. Teachers are positive about the support and training that they receive. However, there has not yet been enough attention paid to ensuring that teachers build a strong knowledge of all the subjects that they teach.

p.4

designation

The curriculum for early reading is piecemeal. Teachers use a range of approaches to teach phonics. Teachers’ expectations of what pupils can learn in phonics are not high enough. Lessons do not help pupils to know more and remember more. Teachers do not demonstrate expert subject knowledge. Reading books do match the sounds that pupils are learning well enough.

p.4

designation

Although leaders are keen to promote a love of reading across the school, the curriculum is not providing pupils with sufficient interesting, challenging and inspirational texts. Nevertheless, leaders have set the expectation that all pupils will read fluently. Teachers are checking that pupils across the school have sufficient phonics knowledge. Leaders are using catch up funding to support these pupils to make gains in this vital and essential learning.

p.4

Additional support

Leaders appreciate greatly the support from an outstanding school. This has provided them with a mentor headteacher and advice on the curriculum. You value the mentor’s secure understanding of the school’s priorities and the pace of support that is enabling steady improvement. The mathematics leader has taken advantage of the help from an expert subject leader. This has led to positive, key changes, such as the new calculation policy.

p.4

Additional support

Governors and external partners all recognise that because there are few leaders currently in place, the school is very reliant on this help. The emergency funding that provided the support from the outstanding school is due to end in December 2021. The local authority provided temporary funding for the acting deputy headteacher role. There are currently no plans in place from January 2022. Leaders need continued access to high-quality support or additional, experienced leaders to sustain the pace of improvement.

p.4

Additional support

The diocese continues to work closely with the school and check the progress that leaders are making. The local authority is working alongside the diocese and the regional schools commissioner to plan for the school’s future. However, the local authority has not produced a statement of action that sets out this aim formally.

p.5

Evidence

We observed the school’s work, scrutinised documents and met with you, the acting deputy headteacher, the mathematics and science leaders and five governors. We met with the mentor headteacher, a representative of the Diocese of Clifton and the director of children’s services from the local authority. We also met with six pupils.

p.5

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion