Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Other · Ofsted letter

Setting

Inspected 11 May 2021 · published 2 Jul 2021

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

Liz Smith

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspection datesingle source

    11 May 2021

  • Inspectorssingle source

    Liz Smith

  • Postcode verified

    IP1 6QD

Page 1 of 4
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+15Mostly positivemore positive than 57% of reports of this type

In line with other reports of this type.

Praiseimprovedhigh-qualityconfidentlyeffectivelyeffectivefeel safeimproving
Criticismunsafeweaknessesrequires improvement

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsWhat needs to improve positive critical
  • Findings898w+15
  • What needs to improve112w0

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No standout praise found.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
4
Words of findings
1,009
about usual (typical 963)
Reading level
Fairly hard
Flesch 51, typical 48
Average sentence
16 words
Next steps
6
typical 2
Hedged sentences
5%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 89%What needs to improve 11%

Full report text

Store Street Manchester M1 2WD T 0300 123 1231 www.gov.uk/ofsted

p.1

Gemma Andrews Headteacher Castle Hill Junior School Dryden Road Ipswich Suffolk IP1 6QD

p.1

School

Following my visit to your school on 11 May 2021 with Fyfe Johnston, Her Majesty’s Inspector (HMI), I write on behalf of Her Majesty's Chief Inspector of Education, Children's Services and Skills to confirm the monitoring inspection findings. Thank you for the help you gave during the inspection and for the time you made available to discuss the actions that have been taken to improve the school since the most recent section 5 inspection.

p.1

School

The monitoring inspection was carried out under section 8(2) of the Education Act 2005 and has taken place because the school has received two successive judgements of requires improvement at its previous section 5 inspections.

p.1

School

This was the first routine inspection the school received since the 2020-21 COVID- 19 (coronavirus) pandemic. I discussed the impact of the pandemic with the school and have taken that into account in my evaluation.

p.1

School

Having considered the evidence, I am of the opinion that at this time:

p.1

Leaders and those responsible for governance are taking effective action

in order for the school to become a good school.

p.1

Leaders and those responsible for governance are taking effective action

The school should take further action to:

p.1

Leaders and those responsible for governance are taking effective action

 ensure parents have confidence in how the school deals with any bullying.

p.1

Context

Since the previous inspection, leaders have altered the structure of leadership in the school. There are now separate leaders of reading, writing and mathematics. Support staff have been appointed ‘champions’ for specific areas of the school improvement plan. A new leader of reading started in September 2020. Also, at this time, an experienced governor was also elected as chair of the local governing body.

p.2

Context

In the past year, the number of pupils who speak English as an additional language has risen substantially.

p.2

Main findings

Leaders and governors have not rested on their laurels during the pandemic. They have been resolute in their determination to improve the quality of education in the school. Improvement is evident in all areas identified as needing attention in the previous inspection report.

p.2

Main findings

Leaders have improved the reading curriculum and how it is delivered. Through staff training and sharing best practice, staff are teaching reading with the same approach and expectations. This means that pupils know what to expect in their lessons. The focus on pupils sharing ideas and talking about vocabulary is helping pupils to understand the texts that they read. There is a focus on communication in lessons and this is helping pupils who are in the early stages of learning to speak English. Pupils now have access to high-quality texts, which they can take home to read or read together in class. Pupils say they are reading more often, and that reading is now fun.

p.2

Main findings

Staff understand the importance of supporting pupils who are struggling to read. Early readers revisit their learning of sounds on a regular basis. In the autumn term, leaders ensured that Year 3 pupils revisited Year 2 phonics. Almost all pupils have caught up with their knowledge of sounds. Pupils are enjoying age appropriate books that match the sounds that they know.

p.2

Main findings

Plans for the wider curriculum contain frequent opportunities for pupils to revisit important knowledge. This is helping pupils use prior knowledge to apply what they know. Pupils spoke confidently about the learning undertaken in the most recent national lockdown. The focus on subject specific vocabulary is making a difference. For example, Year 5 pupils spoke knowledgeably about their learning in geography. They used subject specific vocabulary to explain coastal erosion and its impact on headland.

p.2

Main findings

Leaders have focused on making sure that teachers’ knowledge of educational practice is improving. A new training website contains recorded videos and webinars so that staff can learn at a time suitable to them. Staff commented on how this approach has improved their understanding of teaching methods and subject knowledge.

p.2

Main findings

Governors continue to hold school leaders to account for the quality of education that pupils receive. For example, they have sought parental opinion about online learning. Governors check the timeliness of actions outlined in the school’s strategic development plan. They examine whether actions are having impact.

p.3

Main findings

The school’s strategic development plan focuses appropriately on the weaknesses identified at the previous inspection, as well as other school priorities.

p.3

Main findings

Many parents told us that ‘home school provision has been amazing’ and ‘we cannot praise staff enough’. However, there were also a few mixed views about how leaders deal with bullying. A minority of parents who responded to Parent View, say that their child feels unsafe and that leaders do not deal with bullying quickly and effectively. Inspectors checked safeguarding procedures and found they remain effective. Pupils told inspectors that they feel safe and that they trust teachers to deal with bullying.

p.3

Additional support

Trust leaders contributed towards a good pace of improvement during the pandemic. For example, trust leaders supported school leaders in their evaluation of the impact of improvement. This, as well as leadership training, has ensured leaders better understand what they need to do in their roles. Staff work in close collaboration with other schools in the trust and have access to subject networks.

p.3

Additional support

Leaders appreciate the support of the external reading consultant. She has supported staff with the planning of the reading curriculum and its delivery.

p.3

Evidence

During the inspection, meetings were held with the headteacher and other senior leaders, the chief executive officer (CEO) and the deputy CEO of the trust, and the chair of governors to discuss the actions taken since the last inspection. Inspectors also spoke with leaders of alternative provision, staff, parents, and pupils. Inspectors visited lessons, observed pupils read and scrutinised documentation. Inspectors considered the 39 responses to Ofsted’s online survey, Parent View, including 28 free-text comments. They also reviewed 53 responses to Ofsted’s online staff survey.

p.3

Evidence

I am copying this letter to the chair of the local governing body, the chair of the board of trustees, and the chief executive officer of the ASSET Education multi- academy trust, the regional schools commissioner and the director of children's services for Suffolk. This letter will be published on the Ofsted reports website.

p.3

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion