Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Other · Ofsted letter

Setting

Inspected 18 May 2021 · published 1 Jul 2021

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

Fiona Manuel

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspection datesingle source

    18 May 2021

  • Inspectorssingle source

    Fiona Manuel

  • Postcode verified

    NE63 0AX

Page 1 of 4
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+37Positivemore positive than 70% of reports of this type

In line with other reports of this type.

Praiseconfidentproudeffectivelyambitiousstrongpreciselyhappywarm
Criticismweaknessesrequires improvementdisruptionconcernsinconsistenciesfalling behindgapsnot clearly

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsWhat needs to improve positive critical
  • Findings1121w+39
  • What needs to improve196w+9

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No strong criticism found.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
4
Words of findings
1,315
longer than usual (typical 963)
Reading level
Hard
Flesch 48, typical 48
Average sentence
15 words
Next steps
8
typical 2
Hedged sentences
8%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 85%What needs to improve 15%

Full report text

Store Street Manchester M1 2WD T 0300 123 1231 www.gov.uk/ofsted

p.1

Andrew Roberts Executive Principal Central Primary School Milburn Road Ashington Northumberland NE63 0AX

p.1

School

Following my visit to your school on 18 May 2021, I write on behalf of Her Majesty’s Chief Inspector of Education, Children’s Services and Skills to confirm the monitoring inspection findings. Thank you for the help you gave during the inspection and for the time you made available to discuss the actions that have been taken to improve the school since the most recent section 5 inspection.

p.1

School

The monitoring inspection was carried out under section 8(2) of the Education Act 2005 and has taken place because the school has received two successive judgements of requires improvement at its previous section 5 inspections.

p.1

School

This was the first routine inspection the school received since the COVID-19 (coronavirus) pandemic began. I discussed the impact of the pandemic with you and have taken that into account in my evaluation.

p.1

School

Having considered the evidence, I am of the opinion that at this time:

p.1

Leaders and those responsible for governance are taking effective action

in order for the school to become a good school.

p.1

Leaders and those responsible for governance are taking effective action

The school should take further action to:

p.1

Leaders and those responsible for governance are taking effective action

 plan and sequence each subject precisely, detailing what pupils are expected to know, be able to do and remember as they move through the school  continue to support and challenge subject leaders to clearly demonstrate the impact that their actions are having on pupils’ learning and progress.

p.1

Context

Since the previous inspection in October 2019, senior leaders have brought about stability in terms of staffing. Recruiting and retaining staff have proven difficult in the past. This frustrated leaders’ ability to hone the quality of education and plan for the future. However, leaders are confident that the right people are now in place, sharing their ambition and vision for improvement.

p.2

Context

Leaders’ priorities have had to shift and change due to the disruption caused by COVID-19. As a result, the pace of improvement in some areas has slowed. Leaders’ plans to refine the curriculum have been hampered. The manner in which leaders have been able to deliver and monitor their subjects has altered.

p.2

Context

Some governors are new since the previous inspection. A new chair of governors has recently been appointed.

p.2

Main findings

Leaders have high aspirations for pupils. They aim for pupils to be lifelong learners who are ambitious, happy and fulfilled. Relationships between staff and pupils are warm and respectful. Teachers take time to listen to pupils’ dreams and hopes, talking with them about careers, pathways and life choices. Visitors are used to inspire pupils and excite their interests in a wide range of matters, from archery to opera. Such curriculum enrichment helps pupils to see the benefits of learning and prepares them well for later life.

p.2

Main findings

Leaders understand the importance of strong home/school relationships for pupils’ attendance, engagement and success. Where appropriate, parents are invited to embellish the curriculum by contributing their expert knowledge, for example about farming or gardening. One parent commented that, ‘Communication is great’. Leaders also draw on the expertise of police, family support services and mental health teams to meet the needs of pupils and their families. Pupils with special educational needs and/or disabilities are identified promptly and given the help they need to succeed. Pupils’ attendance is improving.

p.2

Main findings

Pupils’ personal, social, emotional and mental health development is a priority for leaders, particularly following the pandemic. Pupils have trusted adults in school with whom they can discuss any concerns. Topical issues, such as relationships and the changes in our lifestyles due to COVID-19, are discussed and debated. Staff value pupils’ opinions.

p.2

Main findings

Reading is high on everybody’s agenda. Staff know that reading offers pupils a key to success across the curriculum and in later life. They share their favourite books and read to pupils every day. There are books aplenty, including online. Pupils read in class, in dens and in outdoor spaces as well as in the libraries on each school site. Pupils read frequently to staff, and those who need additional help or practice get it. Pupils are proud of their reading. A love of reading is being promoted effectively.

p.2

Main findings

Leaders understand the relationship between pupils’ ability to use an increasingly sophisticated vocabulary and their reading success. A firm focus on building pupils’ vocabulary starts in the provision for two-year-olds and continues throughout the school. Staff are well trained in teaching systematic synthetic phonics. Phonics happens at least once a day. Staff model the correct pronunciation of letters, sounds and words for pupils, expertly. Books are well matched to pupils’ phonics knowledge.

p.3

Main findings

School leaders are moving the school in the right direction. They are taking the correct action to tackle the areas of weaknesses identified in the previous inspection and are doing so as promptly as possible. For example, leaders have capitalised on technology to improve the quality of teaching. Staff confidently use video to film, discuss and develop their practices, with leaders and peers. Teachers and teaching support staff value the professional development opportunities leaders provide. Staff feel leaders are considerate of their workload.

p.3

Main findings

Some subject leaders are new to post, while others are very experienced and know their subjects inside out. All are passionate about their responsibilities and are keen to ensure that pupils do well. Subject expertise is building, due to senior leaders pinpointing the right opportunities and training for staff. The quality of subject plans is developing well but some inconsistencies remain. Not all plans show clearly what pupils should know, be able to do and remember over time. Some leaders are learning to identify and explain more precisely the impact that they are having on pupils’ progress and learning.

p.3

Main findings

Leaders ensure that mathematics starts with two-year-olds. Mathematics happens daily. Regular checks and assessment help leaders to identify any gaps in pupils’ learning. Leaders’ focus on securing pupils’ basic number skills and fluency has helped to prevent pupils falling behind in their learning. Support for pupils is timely, and interventions to address misconceptions often happen ‘on the spot’. Leaders feel confident that pupils’ knowledge and understanding of mathematics across the school are much improved.

p.3

Main findings

Governors are proud of their school. They have faith that leaders’ actions are making a positive difference for pupils. Governors monitor leaders’ work remotely at present to see for themselves what is happening. They offer much support for staff and ask challenging questions of leaders, for example about pupils’ attendance. Occasionally, governors do not probe leaders’ responses to develop a deeper understanding of the impact of leaders’ actions on the quality of the curriculum. The new chair of governors already has plans in place to sharpen this aspect of governors’ work.

p.3

Additional support

Leaders are outward facing in their search for support and greater challenge. Subject leaders get involved with educational research, subject associations, local subject Hubs and leaders from other schools. This is helping to broaden and deepen leaders’ subject expertise and knowledge.

p.4

Additional support

Senior leaders draw on expertise from across the trust and share best practice as well as offering constructive feedback to each other. They also work well with the local authority. Leaders feel confident that this critical friendship is supporting the school’s improvement journey effectively. Governors take advantage of training provided by Northumberland’s governor services.

p.4

Evidence

During the inspection, I held meetings with the executive principal, the head of school, other senior leaders, representatives of those responsible for governance and a representative of the local authority to discuss the actions taken since the last inspection.

p.4

Evidence

I examined a range of documents, including governors’ minutes and subject plans, listened to children reading with familiar adults and held a telephone conversation with the headteacher of the Northumberland Pupil Referral Unit. I looked at the 28 responses to Ofsted’s online questionnaire, Parent View, and 73 staff questionnaires.

p.4

Evidence

I am copying this letter to the chair of the governing body, the regional schools commissioner and the director of children’s services for Northumberland. This letter will be published on the Ofsted reports website.

p.4

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion