Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Other · Ofsted letter

Setting

Inspected 26 May 2021 · published 1 Jul 2021

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

Jackie Stillings

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspection datesingle source

    26 May 2021

  • Inspectorssingle source

    Jackie Stillings

  • Postcode verified

    BL9 6LJ

Page 1 of 4
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+42Positivemore positive than 73% of reports of this type

In line with other reports of this type.

Praiseambitioussuccessfullyimprovingconsistentlywell preparedsecureclearlyconsistent
Criticismrequires improvementgapsnot secure

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsWhat needs to improve positive critical
  • Findings964w+39
  • What needs to improve97w+23

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No standout praise found.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No strong criticism found.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
4
Words of findings
1,057
about usual (typical 963)
Reading level
Fairly hard
Flesch 51, typical 48
Average sentence
18 words
Next steps
2
typical 2
Hedged sentences
3%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 91%What needs to improve 9%

Full report text

Store Street Manchester M1 2WD T 0300 123 1231 www.gov.uk/ofsted

p.1

Joanne Morris Headteacher St Paul’s Church of England Primary School Porritt Street Bury Lancashire BL9 6LJ

p.1

England Primary School

Following my visit to your school on 26 May 2021, I write on behalf of Her Majesty’s Chief Inspector of Education, Children’s Services and Skills to confirm the monitoring inspection findings. Thank you for the help you gave during the inspection and for the time you made available to discuss the actions that have been taken to improve the school since the most recent section 5 inspection.

p.1

England Primary School

The monitoring inspection was carried out under section 8(2) of the Education Act 2005 and has taken place because the school has received two successive judgements of requires improvement at its previous section 5 inspections.

p.1

England Primary School

This was the first routine inspection the school received since the COVID-19 (coronavirus) pandemic began. I discussed the impact of the pandemic with you and have taken that into account in my evaluation.

p.1

England Primary School

Having considered the evidence, I am of the opinion that at this time:

p.1

Leaders and those responsible for governance are taking effective action

in order for the school to become a good school.

p.1

Leaders and those responsible for governance are taking effective action

Leaders and those responsible for governance should take further action to:

p.1

Leaders and those responsible for governance are taking effective action

 equip staff with the subject-specific knowledge that they need to deliver all aspects of each subject well  build upon the recently introduced approach to check how well pupils remember what they have learned, so that teachers can help pupils to recall prior knowledge.

p.1

Context

No key staff have either left or joined the school since the last inspection. The local authority appointed an interim executive board (IEB) to replace the governing body in January 2020.

p.2

Main findings

You have benefited considerably from the support of the local authority and the appointment of an IEB. This support has helped you to develop broad and ambitious improvement plans. You have successfully implemented many aspects of these plans, such as those relating to improving the writing and mathematics curriculums. While your plans to improve the curriculum in subjects other than English and mathematics are at an earlier stage of development, your actions to date have established a secure foundation for continued improvement.

p.2

Main findings

You have continued to prioritise the teaching of reading. Leaders have identified the gaps in pupils’ phonics knowledge resulting from the periods of partial school closure. You have supported staff to adapt the phonics programme accordingly. This has helped pupils to get back on track with their reading. Older pupils at the early stages of reading continue to access the phonics programme.

p.2

Main findings

You have focused on developing the design and delivery of the writing curriculum. This curriculum is planned so that the important key knowledge you want pupils to know and remember is identified. This knowledge has been carefully sequenced and builds on pupils’ prior learning. You have ensured that teachers have been suitably trained so that the planned curriculum is delivered consistently well across the school. The pupils whom I spoke with were able to explain how their teachers help them to improve their writing. Work in their books clearly demonstrates the impact of your actions in helping pupils become fluent writers.

p.2

Main findings

You have shown equal determination in bringing about improvements to the way the mathematics curriculum is planned and delivered. As well as introducing pupils to new knowledge, teachers provide them with daily opportunities to recall and use what they have learned before. Teachers check what pupils know and use their findings to adapt plans. There is also a real focus on developing pupils’ mathematical vocabulary. This starts in the early years where children are immersed in a language-rich environment. The children demonstrate their understanding of concepts such as ‘first, then and now’ and are able to apply this to counting. They are being well prepared for the mathematical challenges of the key stage 1 curriculum.

p.2

Main findings

You have introduced a consistent approach to the way leaders of subjects other than English and mathematics plan their curriculums. Your aim is for pupils to ‘see it, say it, learn it, use it’. You ensure that curriculum leaders identify the key vocabulary that pupils are expected to know. Your plans to assess how well pupils remember what they have learned have only recently been introduced. The pupils whom I spoke to talked about how quizzes are helping them to remember their current learning in subjects such as science. However, their recall of previous learning is less secure.

p.2

Main findings

Some subjects, such as music, are taught by teachers with wide-ranging expert knowledge. In other subjects, such as science, teachers do not have the same level of expertise in all aspects of the subject. Leaders have not provided teachers with sufficient support to develop their subject-specific knowledge. This affects teachers’ ability to help pupils deepen their knowledge.

p.3

Main findings

Members of the IEB recognise the improvements that you and other leaders have made since the previous inspection. They are also aware that work remains to be done. They are mindful of staff’s well-being and workload. They have considered how governance and leadership can be further strengthened and sustained in the future.

p.3

Additional support

Leadership has been strengthened by the support of the local authority, a national leader of education and a local leader of education. Together, this support has helped you to clarify the strategy for improving the school. It has helped you and other leaders to improve the design and delivery of the curriculum in both English and mathematics.

p.3

Evidence

During the inspection, I held meetings with you, other senior leaders, pupils, staff, the national and local leaders of education currently providing support to the school, members of the IEB and representatives of the local authority to discuss the actions taken since the last inspection.

p.3

Evidence

I visited writing and mathematics lessons, saw pupils being taught to play the violin and glockenspiel and observed pupils reading with teachers and support staff. I viewed samples of pupils’ work and reviewed curriculum plans for writing, mathematics, science and music. I also reviewed the school improvement plan and minutes from IEB meetings.

p.3

Evidence

I took account of 14 responses to Parent View, Ofsted’s online questionnaire, including 13 free-text comments, and nine responses to the staff online survey.

p.3

Evidence

I am copying this letter to the chair of the IEB, the director of education for the Diocese of Manchester, the regional schools commissioner and the director of children’s services for Bury. This letter will be published on the Ofsted reports website. Yours sincerely

p.3

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion