Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Other · Ofsted letter

Setting

Inspected 13 May 2021

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

Steve Mellors

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspection datesingle source

    13 May 2021

  • Inspectorssingle source

    Steve Mellors

  • Postcode verified

    WD7 9DX

Page 1 of 4
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+12Mostly positivemore positive than 56% of reports of this type

In line with other reports of this type.

Praisesecure knowledgeeffectiveconfidentlysuccessfulenjoymenteffectivelywell supportedaccurate
Criticismdelayedgapsrequires improvementlimitednot timelylower

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsWhat needs to improve positive critical
  • Findings813w+23
  • What needs to improve169w−21

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No strong criticism found.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
4
Words of findings
979
about usual (typical 963)
Reading level
Fairly hard
Flesch 53, typical 48
Average sentence
15 words
Next steps
8
typical 2
Hedged sentences
10%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 83%What needs to improve 17%

Full report text

Store Street Manchester M1 2WD T 0300 123 1231 www.gov.uk/ofsted

p.1

Kate Fiddler Headteacher Shenley Primary School London Road Shenley Radlett Hertfordshire WD7 9DX

p.1

School

Following my visit to your school on 13 May 2021, I write on behalf of Her Majesty’s Chief Inspector of Education, Children’s Services and Skills to confirm the monitoring inspection findings. Thank you for the help you gave during the inspection and for the time you made available to discuss the actions that have been taken to improve the school since the most recent section 5 inspection.

p.1

School

The monitoring inspection was carried out under section 8(2) of the Education Act 2005 and has taken place because the school has received two successive judgements of requires improvement at its previous section 5 inspections.

p.1

School

This was the first routine inspection the school received since the COVID-19 (coronavirus) pandemic began. I discussed the impact of the pandemic with you and have taken that into account in my evaluation.

p.1

School

Having considered the evidence, I am of the opinion that at this time:

p.1

Leaders and those responsible for governance are taking effective action

in order for the school to become a good school.

p.1

Leaders and those responsible for governance are taking effective action

The school should take further action to:

p.1

Leaders and those responsible for governance are taking effective action

 ensure that teachers have a secure knowledge of the subjects they teach so that pupils in all year groups achieve well across the curriculum.

p.1

Context

The recent partial closure of schools, caused by the COVID-19 pandemic, has delayed your plans for the development of subjects across the curriculum. Leaders have also delayed their plans for the introduction of a new phonics programme.

p.2

Context

Since the previous full inspection, you have completed a restructure of the leadership team and support staff. Your team now includes a deputy headteacher, who is also the special educational needs coordinator. There are new phase leaders of the lower and upper school. The team also includes a leader of the early years. There have been changes to the governing body. Apart from the chair of governors, most governors are new to their role. The body also includes an experienced governor who also works for the local authority’s governance services.

p.2

Main findings

Despite the challenges of a restructure of staffing and the COVID-19 pandemic, you have remained resolute in your focus on school improvement. Leaders are making the changes necessary to improve the school. You have an accurate understanding of what needs to be done. This is understood by staff, including those who are new to their roles.

p.2

Main findings

Since the previous inspection, you have reviewed your systems for checking how well teachers deliver the curriculum. You have identified where staff require further support. As a result, teachers have a better understanding of leaders’ expectations. Not all teachers have a secure understanding of the subjects they teach. Pupils’ misconceptions are not addressed in a timely manner.

p.2

Main findings

Some subject leaders are new to their roles. They have received training to help them carry out their responsibilities. Not all subject plans have been developed. Some do not identify the most important things pupils need to learn or a clear order of what teachers need to teach and when.

p.2

Main findings

In some subjects, such as mathematics, leaders have identified gaps in pupils’ knowledge following pupils’ return to school. Leaders have modified their plans to help teachers address these gaps in an effective way. This means that pupils are getting back on track in their learning.

p.2

Main findings

Curriculum plans also identify important vocabulary. This means pupils speak confidently about their learning. For example, Year 4 pupils remembered what they had learned about electricity. They can use terms such as insulators, conductors and the flow of currents.

p.2

Main findings

The introduction of the new phonics programme has been delayed due to the impact of COVID-19. Leaders have completed a review of the books for pupils who are starting to read. Books are now well matched to the sounds pupils know. There is a consistent approach to teaching early reading. However, some pupils have fallen behind with their phonics skills. They do not receive enough timely support to help them catch up quickly.

p.2

Main findings

Older pupils are becoming more successful in understanding how to retrieve information and meaning from texts. The refurbishment of the library, along with classroom book corners, provide a wider range of reading materials that pupils are accessing. Pupils’ enjoyment of reading is promoted effectively through daily story times, reading challenges and competitions.

p.3

Main findings

Leaders are well supported by governors. New governors have undertaken training so that they are able to check the work of leaders and monitor the impact of their actions carefully. Some of their visits have been limited by the pandemic. They have sought different ways to gather information about the school’s improvement. Their challenge is focused on the school’s priorities.

p.3

Additional support

Leaders have used the help of external partners well. They have benefited from a range of support from the local authority. This has included support with financial and personnel issues, as well as developing expertise in the curriculum. English and mathematics advisers have regularly supported the school. The Hertfordshire improvement partner provides timely advice to help guide leaders’ improvement work.

p.3

Evidence

During the inspection, I held meetings with you, other senior leaders, pupils, staff, representatives of those responsible for governance and a representative of the local authority to discuss the actions taken since the last inspection. I also reviewed a range of documentation, including your evaluation of the school, the school improvement plans, minutes of the governing body and school curriculum plans.

p.3

Evidence

As part of the inspection, I considered 58 responses to Ofsted’s online questionnaire, Parent View, as well as six additional free-text messages. I looked at 16 responses to Ofsted’s staff questionnaire. There were no responses to the pupil questionnaire.

p.3

Evidence

Along with you and other leaders, we visited lessons and looked at pupils’ books.

p.3

Evidence

I am copying this letter to the chair of the governing body, the regional schools commissioner and the director of children’s services for Hertfordshire. This letter will be published on the Ofsted reports website. Yours sincerely

p.3

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion