Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Other · Ofsted letter

Setting

Inspected 25 May 2021 · published 29 Jun 2021

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

Damien Turrell

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspection datesingle source

    25 May 2021

  • Inspectorssingle source

    Damien Turrell

  • Postcode verified

    NN5 6BW

Page 1 of 3
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+33Mostly positivemore positive than 68% of reports of this type

In line with other reports of this type.

Praiseclearlyenjoyeffectivesupportivehappypositiveimproving
Criticismrequires improvementunclearnot clearly

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsWhat needs to improve positive critical
  • Findings727w+30
  • What needs to improve82w+20

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No standout praise found.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No strong criticism found.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
3
Words of findings
808
about usual (typical 963)
Reading level
Hard
Flesch 49, typical 48
Average sentence
16 words
Next steps
4
typical 2
Hedged sentences
8%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 90%What needs to improve 10%

Full report text

Store Street Manchester M1 2WD T 0300 123 1231 www.gov.uk/ofsted

p.1

Penny Howell Chiltern Primary School Chiltern Way Duston Northampton Northamptonshire NN5 6BW

p.1

School

Following my visit to your school on 25 May 2021, I write on behalf of Her Majesty’s Chief Inspector of Education, Children’s Services and Skills to confirm the monitoring inspection findings. Thank you for the help you gave during the inspection and for the time you made available to discuss the actions that have been taken to improve the school since the most recent section 5 inspection.

p.1

School

The monitoring inspection was carried out under section 8(2) of the Education Act 2005 and has taken place because the school has received two successive judgements of requires improvement at its previous section 5 inspections.

p.1

School

This was the first routine inspection the school received since the COVID-19 (coronavirus) pandemic began. I discussed the impact of the pandemic with you and have taken that into account in my evaluation.

p.1

School

Having considered the evidence, I am of the opinion that at this time:

p.1

Leaders and those responsible for governance are taking effective action

in order for the school to become a good school.

p.1

Leaders and those responsible for governance are taking effective action

The school should take further action to:

p.1

Leaders and those responsible for governance are taking effective action

 urgently improve curriculum plans so that subject knowledge is clearly identified and sequenced in all subjects.

p.1

Context

Since the school’s most recent section 5 inspection, a number of staff have left the school. A new assistant headteacher and special educational needs coordinator have been appointed. There is a new chair and vice-chair of the governing body. A number of other governors are new to role.

p.2

Main findings

Leaders are gradually improving the school’s curriculum. In some subjects, leaders have set out what they want pupils to learn. In subjects where plans are further ahead, such as in history, leaders have set out the sequence of learning in each year group. However, leaders agree that the knowledge that they expect pupils to learn is not set out clearly enough in all subjects. For example, plans for modern foreign languages, music, geography, science and physical education are at the early stages of development.

p.2

Main findings

Where curriculum plans are unclear, teachers do not plan activities that build pupils’ knowledge and understanding. For example, pupils write diaries about life in the time of Samuel Pepys, without sufficient grasp of the historical facts. Pupils learning about the planets remembered making rockets, rather than knowledge of the solar system.

p.2

Main findings

Leaders’ improvement plans focus on reading, the curriculum and pupils’ personal development. While these plans are under way, there is still much to do to improve pupils’ learning across the curriculum.

p.2

Main findings

Senior leaders are making sure that subject leaders develop the knowledge to bring improvements across the curriculum. Some subject leaders are using research to inform their plans and developing links with networks of schools. For example, the leaders for reading and phonics use evidence to inform their plans. Leaders have ensured that phonics is a priority. Pupils who need additional support receive extra sessions in phonics to help them read. Leaders make sure that the books pupils read match their phonic knowledge. Pupils enjoy reading, and adults provide appropriate support. Pupils apply their phonic knowledge when reading unfamiliar words.

p.2

Main findings

Leaders are determined that all pupils will achieve and succeed. Teachers adapt the curriculum to support pupils with special educational needs and/or disabilities to access the same lesson content as others. This is more effective when curriculum content sets out clearly the knowledge and skills which pupils are learning.

p.2

Main findings

Governors hold leaders to account, for example, about the impact of leaders’ actions. They understand the importance of providing support as well as challenge to leaders. Governors’ questions to leaders reflect their sense of urgency that the school improves. Governors fulfil their statutory duties for safeguarding. Parents and carers are overwhelmingly supportive of the school. They say that their children are happy at the school. A typical parental comment was, ‘Teachers are willing to listen and support parents where needed.’ Parents are particularly positive about the support provided for families during the pandemic.

p.2

Additional support

Representatives of the local authority provide access to local networks of schools. Leaders use this support to further extend their knowledge and understanding of how to improve their school.

p.3

Evidence

During the inspection, I held meetings with you, other senior and curriculum leaders, pupils, staff, the chair of governors and representatives of the local authority to discuss the actions taken since the last inspection.

p.3

Evidence

I visited lessons and observed pupils reading to staff. I reviewed responses to Ofsted’s online questionnaire, Parent View, including 19 free-text responses, and 30 staff questionnaires. I reviewed the school’s plans for improvement, minutes of governors’ meetings and reports from the local authority. I scrutinised the single central register or pre-employment checks.

p.3

Evidence

I am copying this letter to the chair of the governing body, the regional schools commissioner and the director of children’s services for West Northamptonshire. This letter will be published on the Ofsted reports website.

p.3

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion