Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Other · Ofsted letter

Setting

Inspected 20 May 2021 · published 29 Jun 2021

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

Lydia Pride

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspection datesingle source

    20 May 2021

  • Inspectorssingle source

    Lydia Pride

  • Postcode verified

    TQ12 1PT

Page 1 of 4
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+31Mostly positivemore positive than 66% of reports of this type

In line with other reports of this type.

Praisewell-sequencedhigh-qualityeffectivelyconfidenteffectiveenjoysuccessfullysuccessful
Criticismrequires improvementlacknot alwaysnot yet

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsWhat needs to improve positive critical
  • Findings815w+27
  • What needs to improve132w+33

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No strong criticism found.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
4
Words of findings
944
about usual (typical 963)
Reading level
Fairly hard
Flesch 52, typical 48
Average sentence
16 words
Next steps
5
typical 2
Hedged sentences
13%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 86%What needs to improve 14%

Full report text

Store Street Manchester M1 2WD T 0300 123 1231 www.gov.uk/ofsted

p.1

Kelly Dunne St Joseph’s Catholic Primary School Coombeshead Road Highweek Newton Abbot Devon TQ12 1PT

p.1

Primary School

Following my visit to your school on 20 May 2021, I write on behalf of Her Majesty’s Chief Inspector of Education, Children’s Services and Skills to confirm the monitoring inspection findings. Thank you for the help you gave during the inspection and for the time you made available to discuss the actions that have been taken to improve the school since the most recent section 5 inspection.

p.1

Primary School

The monitoring inspection was carried out under section 8(2) of the Education Act 2005 and has taken place because the school has received two successive judgements of requires improvement at its previous section 5 inspections.

p.1

Primary School

This was the first routine inspection the school received since the COVID-19 (coronavirus) pandemic began. I discussed the impact of the pandemic with you and have taken that into account in my evaluation.

p.1

Primary School

Having considered the evidence, I am of the opinion that at this time:

p.1

Leaders and those responsible for governance are taking effective action

in order for the school to become a good school. The school should take further action to:

p.1

Leaders and those responsible for governance are taking effective action

 set out and sequence the most important knowledge for pupils to learn across the curriculum  use assessment effectively, so that pupils know and remember more  ensure that teachers identify pupils with special educational needs and/or disabilities (SEND) quickly and work closely with parents to ensure that pupils’ needs are met fully.

p.2

Context

Since the previous section 5 inspection, you have reorganised the leadership of several subjects. The curriculum leader for mathematics has left the school. You are leading the mathematics curriculum on a temporary basis.

p.2

Context

Pupils from seven different year groups are organised into five classes. Pupils are taught in mixed-age classes from the Reception Year through to the end of Year 4.

p.2

Main findings

The most recent section 5 inspection took place in February 2020. In the year that followed, you met the challenges of the COVID-19 pandemic and chose the right improvement priorities for the school. You moved swiftly to strengthen reading and mathematics. You put leadership in place for several different subjects. Although curriculum plans are at an early stage in some subjects, staff are keen to develop these.

p.2

Main findings

You have strengthened the leadership of reading. Staff are confident of delivering a well-sequenced programme of phonics. Their teaching is increasingly effective. As a result, pupils read with growing confidence and fluency. Teachers carefully check pupils’ knowledge of sounds to help them catch up when needed. You provide a wide range of reading experiences for pupils, which they enjoy.

p.2

Main findings

You have introduced a new curriculum for mathematics. You now expect all pupils to learn the same curriculum content. Teachers provide extra support for those pupils who need it. Consequently, you have successfully raised teachers’ expectations of what pupils can learn in mathematics.

p.2

Main findings

Leaders have set out what they want pupils to learn in other subjects. However, they have not yet set out the order for teaching key knowledge. Leaders have been unsure of how to plan this due to the challenges of teaching mixed-age classes. Leaders feel better placed to overcome this challenge. You have wisely set aside time for staff to work together on this before the end of this school year. As leaders develop the curriculum, they are considering how to check what pupils know and can remember in different subjects. For example, in history and geography, teachers have begun to focus assessment on the most useful information and ideas that they think pupils must know. However, this piece of work is in its infancy. If successful, you plan to extend it to other curriculum areas. In the meantime, there is no coherent approach to assessing pupils in the current curriculum.

p.2

Main findings

You strive for pupils with SEND to learn as much of the curriculum as possible. There are some helpful adjustments in place to help pupils learn. You have prioritised time for staff to meet and review the progress of pupils with SEND. However, sometimes teachers lack confidence in identifying pupils’ needs quickly enough. They do not always work closely with parents to produce high-quality learning plans which meet pupils’ needs.

p.3

Main findings

In March 2020, a monitoring inspection highlighted the need for governors to challenge and support school leaders to improve the curriculum. In response, there is a schedule of meetings in place between governors and curriculum leaders for this work to commence.

p.3

Additional support

The school has received support from the local English Hub to improve the reading curriculum. This is complemented by support for the leadership of reading, commissioned by the trust.

p.3

Additional support

In addition, the trust provides valuable opportunities for curriculum leaders to meet with their counterparts from other schools. Curriculum leaders also benefit from training provided by a range of other subject associations and networks. The trust has provided useful guidance to governors to support more robust discussions with school leaders.

p.3

Evidence

During the inspection, I met with you, the special educational needs coordinator, the education standards manager for the multi-academy trust and representatives of the local governing body to discuss the actions taken since the last inspection.

p.3

Evidence

In addition, I met with a range of curriculum leaders and carried out visits to lessons. I scrutinised documents, including the school improvement plan. I considered responses to Ofsted’s online questionnaire, Parent View, including one free-text response, and 11 staff questionnaires.

p.3

Evidence

I am copying this letter to the chair of the board of trustees, and the chief executive officer of the Plymouth CAST multi-academy trust, the director of education for the Diocese of Plymouth, the regional schools commissioner and the director of children’s services for Devon. This letter will be published on the Ofsted reports website.

p.3

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion