Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Other · Ofsted letter

Setting

Inspected 18 May 2021 · published 28 Jun 2021

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

Amanda Stringer

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspection datesingle source

    18 May 2021

  • Inspectorssingle source

    Amanda Stringer

  • Postcode verified

    BB5 2AN

Page 1 of 4
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+32Mostly positivemore positive than 67% of reports of this type

In line with other reports of this type.

Praiseeffectivelyeffectivesuccessfulpreciseconfidentlyenjoystrengthspositively
Criticismgapsrequires improvementdisruptiondelayedabsencelower

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsWhat needs to improve positive critical
  • Findings873w+42
  • What needs to improve186w−20

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No strong criticism found.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
4
Words of findings
1,056
about usual (typical 963)
Reading level
Hard
Flesch 49, typical 48
Average sentence
17 words
Next steps
7
typical 2
Hedged sentences
7%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 82%What needs to improve 18%

Full report text

Store Street Manchester M1 2WD T 0300 123 1231 www.gov.uk/ofsted

p.1

Debbie Mulcock Acting Headteacher St Anne’s and St Joseph’s Roman Catholic Primary School Sandy Lane Accrington Lancashire BB5 2AN

p.1

Joseph’s Roman Catholic Primary School

Following my visit to your school on 18 May 2021, I write on behalf of Her Majesty’s Chief Inspector of Education, Children’s Services and Skills to confirm the monitoring inspection findings. Thank you for the help you gave during the inspection and for the time you made available to discuss the actions that have been taken to improve the school since the most recent section 5 inspection.

p.1

Joseph’s Roman Catholic Primary School

The monitoring inspection was carried out under section 8(2) of the Education Act 2005 and has taken place because the school has received three successive judgements of requires improvement at its previous section 5 inspections.

p.1

Joseph’s Roman Catholic Primary School

This was the first routine inspection the school received since the COVID-19 (coronavirus) pandemic. I discussed the impact of the pandemic with you and have taken that into account in my evaluation.

p.1

Joseph’s Roman Catholic Primary School

Having considered the evidence, I am of the opinion that at this time:

p.1

Leaders and those responsible for governance are taking effective action

in order for the school to become a good school. The school should take further action to:

p.1

Leaders and those responsible for governance are taking effective action

 ensure that leaders resume their checks on the delivery of curriculum plans to identify the impact of the refined curriculum on helping pupils to know more and remember more  ensure that staff use assessment information more effectively to identify those pupils who need help to catch up  embed the new phonics programme, particularly in key stage 2, for pupils who are at the early stages of reading.

p.2

Context

Since the last inspection, there have been significant changes in leadership at all levels. Following a period of absence, the previous headteacher resigned in April 2020. There have been changes to the roles and responsibilities of leaders in school. For example, the deputy head teacher took up the post of acting head teacher. A new curriculum leader and a new special educational needs coordinator have been appointed. A new chair of governors and vice-chair of governors have also been appointed.

p.2

Context

The impact of the pandemic has brought disruption to the recruitment process for the appointment of a permanent headteacher.

p.2

Main findings

Following the last inspection, the school community went through a period of uncertainty about the leadership of the school. Since then, with the support of the local authority and the diocese, you have taken effective action to begin developing leadership at all levels. You have been successful in galvanising staff to support leaders’ work to improve the school.

p.2

Main findings

You and other leaders have developed a detailed improvement plan. The planned actions are appropriate, and the criteria for checking the success of your work are measurable and precise. Against the backdrop of the pandemic, you have been able to complete many of your planned actions. For example, you ensure that staff receive the training that they need to deliver the curriculum well.

p.2

Main findings

You have ensured that the curriculum is underpinned by carefully sequenced curriculum plans that identify the knowledge that you want pupils to have. Curriculum plans are designed to meet the needs of all pupils, including those with special educational need and/or disabilities. Subject leaders work with staff to help them to deliver the curriculum effectively.

p.2

Main findings

Leaders have begun to check the impact that the curriculum has on helping pupils to remember what they have been taught. However, some checks have been delayed due to COVID-19 restrictions. This has hampered subject leaders’ ability to assess how well pupils are knowing more and remembering more.

p.2

Main findings

You are supporting teachers to use assessment information more effectively to identify what pupils have learned. However, teachers are at the early stages of spotting the precise gaps in pupils’ learning so that pupils receive the support that they need to catch up.

p.3

Main findings

Reading has a high priority across the school. Pupils talk confidently about the texts that they enjoy. They can explain how vocabulary is used effectively to express emotions and describe characters. The help that you receive from the English hub has strengthened the delivery of the phonics programme, especially in early years and key stage 1. Even so, many pupils developed gaps in their phonics knowledge during the spring term. The help that they receive is helping most pupils to catch up. That said, pupils at the early stages of reading in lower key stage 2 are struggling to regain their phonics knowledge.

p.3

Main findings

Since the last inspection, decisive actions have been taken to strengthen governance. Governors are now well placed to provide appropriate support and challenge to leaders at all levels. They have a comprehensive understanding of the school’s strengths and priorities for further improvement.

p.3

Main findings

Those parents and carers who responded to Parent View, Ofsted’s online survey, commented positively about the care and help that you and staff provide for their children. Most staff feel well supported. They value the consideration given to them by leaders at all levels.

p.3

Additional support

You have used the support provided by the local authority and the diocese to strengthen leadership, including governance. Support from a national leader for education has enabled you to plan effectively in order to improve the quality of education across the school. Training for subject leaders has further enhanced leadership and the delivery of the curriculum. Your engagement with other schools has been beneficial for subject leaders and staff at all levels to share ideas and expertise.

p.3

Evidence

During the inspection, I met with you, subject leaders and members of staff. I also met virtually with representatives of those responsible for governance and representatives from the local authority and the diocese to discuss the actions taken since the last inspection.

p.3

Evidence

I visited lessons, including phonics sessions, and listened to pupils read. I also spoke with pupils about their learning and looked at examples of their work. I reviewed curriculum planning and minutes of governing body meetings. I also reviewed improvement plans and monitoring reports from local authority representatives.

p.3

Evidence

I took account of the 20 responses to Parent View, Ofsted’s online questionnaire, and considered the three free-text comments from parents. I also considered the 18 responses to the staff questionnaire.

p.4

Evidence

I am copying this letter to the chair of the governing body, the director of education for the Diocese of Salford, the regional schools commissioner and the director of children’s services for Lancashire. This letter will be published on the Ofsted reports website.

p.4

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion