Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Other · Ofsted letter

Setting

Inspected 12 May 2021 · published 28 Jun 2021

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

John Donald

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspection datesingle source

    12 May 2021

  • Inspectorssingle source

    John Donald

  • Postcode verified

    OL8 4BL

Page 1 of 4
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+15Mostly positivemore positive than 57% of reports of this type

In line with other reports of this type.

Praiseeffectivelywell-plannedambitiousimprovedsupportivetimelyconsistent
Criticismdisruptionrequires improvementdelayedabsence

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsWhat needs to improve positive critical
  • Findings983w+27
  • What needs to improve170w−39

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
4
Words of findings
1,151
about usual (typical 963)
Reading level
Fairly hard
Flesch 53, typical 48
Average sentence
17 words
Next steps
6
typical 2
Hedged sentences
4%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 85%What needs to improve 15%

Full report text

Store Street Manchester M1 2WD T 0300 123 1231 www.gov.uk/ofsted

p.1

Jonathan Bell Principal Werneth Primary School Coppice Street Oldham Lancashire OL8 4BL

p.1

School

Following my visit to your school on 12 May 2021, I write on behalf of Her Majesty's Chief Inspector of Education, Children's Services and Skills to confirm the monitoring inspection findings. Thank you for the help you gave during the inspection and for the time you made available to discuss the actions that have been taken to improve the school since the most recent section 5 inspection.

p.1

School

The monitoring inspection was carried out under section 8(2) of the Education Act 2005 and has taken place because the school has received two successive judgements of requires improvement at its previous section 5 inspections.

p.1

School

This was the first routine inspection the school received since the 2020-21 COVID- 19 (coronavirus) pandemic. I discussed the impact of the pandemic with you and have taken that into account in my evaluation.

p.1

School

Having considered the evidence, I am of the opinion that at this time:

p.1

Leaders and those responsible for governance are taking effective action

in order for the school to become a good school.

p.1

Leaders and those responsible for governance are taking effective action

The school should take further action to:

p.1

Leaders and those responsible for governance are taking effective action

 ensure that teachers use curriculum plans well to design learning that builds on what pupils know and can do in physical education (PE), computing, languages and music  develop further teachers’ expertise in delivering the new approach to the early reading and phonics curriculums so that pupils, including children in the early years, have more opportunities to practise the sounds that they know.

p.1

Context

You have been in post as principal since September 2020. During that time, one assistant principal has left the school and six new teachers have joined. Since the previous inspection in May 2019, many new governors have been appointed. A new chair of the local governing body has also taken up their post.

p.2

Context

Since September 2020, the school has undergone substantial disruption due to the impact of COVID-19, including considerable rates of staff and pupil absence. Your work to improve the school has continued, albeit slower than you planned.

p.2

Main findings

You, school leaders and governors have prioritised your actions to improve the school appropriately. At the time of the previous inspection, curriculum plans were not helping pupils to learn well. You have made improvements to subject curriculums. Your improvement plans focus on the key actions that you, other leaders, staff and governors must take to continue to bring about developments in a timely manner.

p.2

Main findings

Firstly, you focused your attention on the development of curriculums in reading, writing and mathematics. This was driven by the recommendations that inspectors made at the previous inspection. Following the design of well-planned and more ambitious curriculums in these subjects, you extended this work to other subjects. As a result, curriculums in English, mathematics, science, history and geography are sequenced well. The new art and design curriculum has been planned and recently introduced across the school. In many subjects, teachers now pay closer attention to what pupils have learned before. As a result, teachers design learning to allow pupils, including those pupils with special educational needs and/or disabilities, to build effectively on what they know already.

p.2

Main findings

Subject leaders have continued to develop curriculum plans across subjects. It has not been easy for you to put these plans into practice due to the disruption caused by COVID-19. However, now that most staff and pupils are back in school you are better placed to bring your curriculum plans to fruition. Teachers are delivering improved curriculums across subjects. That said, teachers are only just beginning to deliver curriculums in PE, languages, music and computing. As a result, there are times when teachers do not design learning in these subjects that builds on what pupils know already.

p.2

Main findings

As part of your work to improve the school’s curriculum, you have ensured that subject leaders check on how well teachers are delivering curriculums. Subject leaders are in the process of developing the expertise of those staff who are less experienced. For example, subject leaders support these staff to plan and deliver key content. Most staff have benefited from a wealth of training to help them deliver new curriculums. Staff are appreciative of the high levels of training they have received since your appointment.

p.2

Main findings

The teaching of reading remains central to your improvement plans. Historically the school has accumulated a myriad of reading schemes. This meant that teachers often found it difficult to match books with the sounds that pupils know. You are in the process of ensuring a consistent approach to the teaching of phonics across the school, including in the early years. The disruption caused by the pandemic has delayed the planned delivery of this approach. However, you are in the process of rolling this approach out across year groups, including plans to ensure that all staff receive appropriate training in how to deliver the phonics curriculum effectively. You have also put suitable systems in place to develop pupils' reading comprehension and fluency. This is helping older pupils to read well. Those pupils in key stage 2 who need additional help with phonics receive tailored support. This includes support for those pupils who speak English as an additional language.

p.3

Main findings

Governors know the school well. They share your determination to improve the school. To this end, governors hold you and other leaders to account effectively. They are well informed about the changes to the curriculum and the school’s approach to the teaching of early reading. This is helping them to support and challenge you and other leaders to accelerate and sustain the pace of improvement.

p.3

Additional support

The school has benefited from a range of support from within the trust. The trust has also facilitated support for the school from both a local teaching school and the local authority. You explained to me that you felt reassured that the help the school receives from the trust is bespoke and supportive.

p.3

Evidence

During the inspection, I held meetings with you and other members of the senior leadership team. I spoke with a group of subject leaders and other teaching staff. I met with the chief executive officer of the multi-academy trust (MAT) and the chair of the board of trustees. I also met with three members of the local governing board, including the chair of governors, to discuss the actions taken since the last inspection.

p.3

Evidence

I visited lessons and spoke with pupils about their learning. I observed children and pupils read to trusted adults. I scrutinised school leaders’ plans to improve the school and a range of curriculum documentation. I also considered the 16 responses to Parent View, Ofsted’s online questionnaire, including four free-text comments and 31 responses to Ofsted’s staff survey. I am copying this letter to the chair of the board of trustees and the chief executive officer of The Pinnacle Learning Trust MAT, the regional schools commissioner and the director of children's services for Oldham. This letter will be published on the Ofsted reports website.

p.3

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion