Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Other · Ofsted letter

Setting

Inspected 13 May 2021 · published 25 Jun 2021

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

Amanda Stringer

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspection datesingle source

    13 May 2021

  • Inspectorssingle source

    Amanda Stringer

  • Postcode verified

    CA2 4JT

Page 1 of 4
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+15Mostly positivemore positive than 57% of reports of this type

In line with other reports of this type.

Praisepositiveeffectivelyhigh-qualitysuccessfulclearlyconfidentlyimprovedeffective
Criticismdelayedweaknessesrequires improvementdisruptionlacksnot strong

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsWhat needs to improve positive critical
  • Findings986w+26
  • What needs to improve133w−32

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
4
Words of findings
1,116
about usual (typical 963)
Reading level
Hard
Flesch 48, typical 48
Average sentence
17 words
Next steps
4
typical 2
Hedged sentences
6%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 88%What needs to improve 12%

Full report text

Store Street Manchester M1 2WD T 0300 123 1231 www.gov.uk/ofsted

p.1

Jose Hodgkins Headteacher Upperby Primary School Uldale Road Upperby Carlisle Cumbria CA2 4JT

p.1

School

Following my visit to your school on 13 May 2021, I write on behalf of Her Majesty's Chief Inspector of Education, Children's Services and Skills to confirm the monitoring inspection findings. Thank you for the help you gave during the inspection and for the time you made available to discuss the actions that have been taken to improve the school since the most recent section 5 inspection.

p.1

School

The monitoring inspection was carried out under section 8(2) of the Education Act 2005 and has taken place because the school has received two successive judgements of requires improvement at its previous section 5 inspections.

p.1

School

This was the first routine inspection the school received since the 2020-21 COVID- 19 (coronavirus) pandemic. I discussed the impact of the pandemic with you and have taken that into account in my evaluation.

p.1

School

Having considered the evidence, I am of the opinion that at this time:

p.1

Leaders and those responsible for governance are taking effective action

in order for the school to become a good school. The school should take further action to:

p.1

Leaders and those responsible for governance are taking effective action

 refine the improvement plan so that the criteria for measuring success are more precise  resume subject leaders’ work with governors so that they are better informed about the curriculum  resume the checks on the newly implemented curriculum plans, for example in religious education (RE), so that leaders can identify what is working well and what further development is required.

p.2

Context

The pandemic has brought significant disruption to the school and wider community. In particular, leaders’ plans to embed and monitor the new curriculum plans for some subjects have been delayed due to the COVID-19 restrictions.

p.2

Context

A new governor has been appointed since the previous inspection. There is currently one vacancy on the governing body.

p.2

Main findings

Since the previous inspection, leaders, governors and staff have worked diligently to bring about positive change. You have raised staff’s expectations for all pupils to be as successful as they can be. Leaders have developed a curriculum to meet the needs of all pupils, including those with special educational needs and/or disabilities (SEND). Curriculum plans covering the early years to Year 6 have been carefully designed.

p.2

Main findings

You have an appropriate action plan in place to tackle the weaknesses raised at the previous inspection. However, the criteria that you are using to measure your success lacks clarity and precision. This hinders leaders and governors from knowing if their work is making a positive difference to pupils’ experience at the school.

p.2

Main findings

Subject leaders have built up their knowledge and understanding of how to lead their subject areas effectively. Curriculum plans clearly sequence the knowledge that you want pupils to have. These plans build progressively on pupils’ prior learning. Appropriate training for staff is helping them to deliver the curriculum effectively. Staff work with the special educational needs coordinator to identify how best to adapt the curriculum plans to meet the needs of pupils with SEND when necessary.

p.2

Main findings

For most subjects, the new curriculum plans are fully in place. Leaders for these subjects check the delivery of the curriculum and provide further support for staff if needed. Leaders’ actions are having a positive impact. For example, pupils can explain how their knowledge of electrical circuits gained in Year 4 helps them when designing and building a parking buzzer for a model car in Year 6. However, the pandemic has delayed similar checks on all subjects, for example RE. This means that leaders are less assured that the new curriculum in these subjects is helping pupils to know more and remember more. Teachers have identified that some pupils have struggled to remember some elements of the curriculum that was taught when most pupils were learning at home. Teachers are adapting their plans to enable forgotten content to be delivered during the summer term. Pupils are beginning to catch up with their learning

p.2

Main findings

because of the additional help that they receive. Teachers’ plans identify clearly what the pupils know and need to learn next.

p.3

Main findings

Curriculum plans across a range of subjects identify the essential vocabulary that pupils need for each subject. Through high-quality texts, staff engage pupils’ interest and enrich further their vocabulary. The pupils that I spoke with explained confidently how they use their learning in English to improve the quality of their writing in other subjects.

p.3

Main findings

The teaching of reading remains a high priority, especially as you have spotted that pupils’ phonics knowledge is not as strong as it was prior to the spring term. Pupils who are struggling to read, including pupils in key stage 2, have the help that they need to catch up.

p.3

Main findings

The ongoing training that governors receive contributes to their improved ability to offer effective support and challenge to leaders. Although in their infancy prior to the pandemic, meetings with subject leaders were providing governors with a comprehensive overview of the improvements in the school. These meetings were disrupted due to COVID-19 restrictions and have only recently resumed. This has hampered governors’ ability to evaluate the progress of the planned actions to improve the quality of education provided.

p.3

Main findings

Staff value your consideration towards their workload and well-being, especially during the current circumstances. Parents and carers who responded to Parent View, Ofsted’s online questionnaire, appreciate the care and guidance that you and the staff provide, particularly with remote learning.

p.3

Additional support

You, staff and governors value the range of external support that you receive. You have used this support well to strengthen subject leadership and to improve the design and delivery of the curriculum. Governors have responded positively to the support provided by the local authority, which is strengthening leadership further still. Your engagement with other schools has been beneficial for staff at all levels, although much of this work has been hindered by the pandemic.

p.3

Evidence

During the inspection, I met with you, other senior leaders and subject leaders. I also met representatives of those responsible for governance and spoke with a representative from the local authority by telephone to discuss the actions taken since the last inspection.

p.4

Evidence

I spoke with pupils about their learning and looked at examples of their work. I visited phonics lessons and also listened to pupils read. I reviewed a range of documentation relating to safeguarding. I also reviewed improvement plans, curriculum planning and governors’ minutes.

p.4

Evidence

I took account of the 61 responses to Parent View, Osted’s online questionnaire. I also considered 13 free-text comments from parents and the 36 responses to the staff online survey.

p.4

Evidence

I am copying this letter to the chair of the governing body, the regional schools commissioner and the director of children's services for Cumbria. This letter will be published on the Ofsted reports website.

p.4

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion