Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Schools & FE · School monitoring visit

Gatehouse Primary Academy

Inspected — · published 24 Jun 2021 · URN 141353

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

Matt Middlemore

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspectorssingle source

    Matt Middlemore

  • Postcode verified

    EX7 0LW

  • Name on report verified

    Gatehouse Primary Academy

Page 1 of 5
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+16Mostly positivemore positive than 48% of reports of this type

In line with other reports of this type.

Praiseeffectivepositiveambitiousstrongknowledgeablewell supportedenjoysettled
Criticismnot alwaysnot well plannedweaknessesnot securenot yet

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsAbout the inspectionLeadership positive critical
  • Findings145w0
  • Leadership873w+16

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No standout praise found.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
5
Words of findings
1,016
shorter than usual (typical 1570)
Reading level
Fairly hard
Flesch 53, typical 47
Average sentence
15 words
Next steps
3
typical 8
Hedged sentences
10%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 14%Leadership 82%About the inspection 4%

Full report text

Store Street Manchester M1 2WD T 0300 123 1231 www.gov.uk/ofsted

p.1

Leila Naldrett Head of School Gatehouse Primary Academy Secmaton Lane Dawlish Devon EX7 0LW

p.1

Academy

Following my visit with Tracey Reynolds and Heather Barraclough, Her Majesty's Inspectors (HMI), to your school on 12–13 May 2021, I write on behalf of Her Majesty's Chief Inspector of Education, Children's Services and Skills to confirm the inspection findings. Thank you for the help you gave during the inspection and for the time you made available to discuss the actions that have been taken to improve the school since the school's previous monitoring inspection.

p.1

Academy

The inspection was the third monitoring inspection since the school was judged to have serious weaknesses following the section 5 inspection that took place in November 2017. It was carried out under section 8 of the Education Act 2005. The monitoring inspection report is attached.

p.1

Academy

This was the first routine inspection the school received since the COVID-19 (coronavirus) pandemic began. We discussed the impact of the pandemic with you and have taken that into account in our evaluation.

p.1

Academy

Having considered the evidence, I am of the opinion that at this time:

p.1

Leaders and managers are taking effective actions towards the removal of

I am copying this letter to the chair of the board of trustees and the chief executive officer of the First Federation multi-academy trust, the regional schools commissioner and the director of children's services for Devon. This letter will be published on the Ofsted reports website. Yours sincerely

p.1

Context

There have been no staff changes since the additional monitoring inspection in February 2021.

p.3

designation

Leaders, with support from the trust, are securing effective improvement across the school. Leaders are determined to improve provision further. Staff are motivated and share leaders’ vision. Staff appreciate training that is provided by the school and the trust.

p.3

designation

Trustees are ambitious. They are diligent and have established effective plans with school leaders. Leaders monitor these plans closely and make suitable adaptations. Before the COVID-19 pandemic, trustees made purposeful visits to assure themselves of the quality of the school’s work. They have plans in place to restart on-site visits.

p.3

designation

The majority of pupils have settled back into school following the last national lockdown. However, some children in the early years are finding school routines more challenging. The early years leader and her staff are working well to ensure that children are ready for the next stage of their education.

p.3

designation

At the last inspection, pupils with special educational needs and/or disabilities (SEND) were not having their needs met. With support from the trust, the special educational needs coordinator (SENCo) is making a positive difference to pupils’ learning. She is knowledgeable and has shared her expertise with staff, so they plan work that is appropriate for pupils with SEND. Pupils, staff and parents value the support from the SENCo.

p.3

designation

Leaders have put an effective early reading curriculum in place. This ensures that pupils gain the fundamental knowledge and skills they need to learn how to read. In addition, pupils who are behind with reading are being well supported to catch up quickly. Pupils enjoy reading. However, once pupils have secured the necessary early reading skills, the next stage of the reading curriculum is not as well planned. In some year groups, the reading curriculum does not build on pupils’ knowledge and skills. In addition, reading activities are not closely linked to what teachers intend pupils to learn. As a result, some pupils do not acquire the knowledge and skills they need to improve their reading.

p.3

designation

Leaders are determined that pupils’ understanding of vocabulary should improve. Teachers ensure that pupils know the meaning of subject-specific words to be able to read, write and talk about what they are learning. This is helping pupils to broaden their vocabulary and helping them to understand key ideas and concepts.

p.3

designation

Until recently, the writing curriculum has not been well planned. Pupils did not have enough opportunities to build on and remember key knowledge and skills. Older pupils have weaknesses in their spelling and punctuation. This is hampering their ability to write accurately and to take their learning to the next stage. However, there are positive signs that the new writing curriculum is having a greater impact on pupils’ learning. Pupils are now building a deeper understanding of key concepts before moving to the next stage in their writing.

p.4

designation

Leaders and staff have dedicated much energy to improving the curriculum in mathematics. The curriculum planning in mathematics is more advanced than in other subjects. The leader for mathematics makes good use of the valuable external support from the trust. The curriculum has been re-structured so that pupils’ mathematical knowledge and skills build well over time. He has made appropriate changes to ensure that pupils are able to recall key concepts and ideas. However, systems to check what pupils have remembered are not efficient enough.

p.4

designation

In 2019, leaders began to re-design the broader curriculum. Although staff started to implement the new curriculum, progress has been slowed by the COVID-19 pandemic. As a result, the curriculum is not yet where leaders would like it to be. Some subjects are more developed than others. For example, the curriculum for modern foreign languages is well structured. However, teachers’ subject knowledge of modern foreign languages is not secure. In contrast, the geography curriculum is being well implemented. This is because, the curriculum is well thought out and teachers’ subject knowledge is stronger. Consequently, pupils’ geographical knowledge and understanding are strengthening.

p.4

designation

Subject leaders do not always know if the curriculum is taught as they intended. This is because they are not checking if teaching is helping pupils to learn the content well. In addition, teachers’ assessment is not always planned to check what pupils have remembered. This means teachers are not informed well enough to plan appropriate next steps for learning. You are aware that this area of the curriculum needs more work.

p.4

Additional support

Leaders make strong use of external support. They draw upon specific expertise to improve the quality of education. In turn, this is helping staff to make appropriate changes to improve curriculum leadership further.

p.4

Evidence

Inspectors observed the school's work, scrutinised documents and met with the head of school, the executive headteacher, other senior leaders, pupils and the chief executive officer of the trust. Inspectors looked at pupils’ work and heard some pupils read. The lead inspector also spoke with trustees and a local hub representative to discuss actions taken since the previous inspection.

p.5

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion