Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Other · Ofsted letter

Setting

Inspected 25 May 2021 · published 22 Jun 2021

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

Heather Simpson

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspection datesingle source

    25 May 2021

  • Inspectorssingle source

    Heather Simpson

  • Postcode verified

    B29 4EE

Page 1 of 4
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+53Positivemore positive than 81% of reports of this type

In line with other reports of this type.

Praisestrengthshigh expectationseffectiveclearwell-sequencedstrongenthusiasticlove
Criticismweaknessesrequires improvementweakernot yetgapslow

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsWhat needs to improve positive critical
  • Findings1181w+53
  • What needs to improve87w0

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No standout praise found.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No strong criticism found.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
4
Words of findings
1,268
longer than usual (typical 963)
Reading level
Fairly hard
Flesch 50, typical 48
Average sentence
17 words
Next steps
5
typical 2
Hedged sentences
4%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 93%What needs to improve 7%

Full report text

Store Street Manchester M1 2WD T 0300 123 1231 www.gov.uk/ofsted

p.1

Janine Arrowsmith Head of School Green Meadow Primary School Green Meadow Road Selly Oak Birmingham B29 4EE

p.1

Primary School

Following my visit to your school on 25 May 2021, I write on behalf of Her Majesty’s Chief Inspector of Education, Children’s Services and Skills to confirm the monitoring inspection findings. Thank you for the help you gave during the inspection and for the time you made available to discuss the actions that have been taken to improve the school since the most recent section 5 inspection.

p.1

Primary School

The monitoring inspection was carried out under section 8(2) of the Education Act 2005 and has taken place because the school has received two successive judgements of requires improvement at its previous section 5 inspections.

p.1

Primary School

This was the first routine inspection the school received since the COVID-19 (coronavirus) pandemic began. I discussed the impact of the pandemic with you and have taken that into account in my evaluation.

p.1

Primary School

Having considered the evidence, I am of the opinion that at this time:

p.1

Leaders and those responsible for governance are taking effective action

in order for the school to become a good school.

p.1

Context

There have been significant changes in leadership since the previous inspection in October 2019. The head of school was appointed in April 2020, having previously been the deputy headteacher. Other leadership changes include internal appointments for the positions of deputy headteacher, assistant headteacher and early years leader. Many subject leaders are new to their curriculum roles this academic year. Governance is now carried out by a regional governing body who oversees the four schools in Excelsior Trust.

p.1

Main findings

The members of the new leadership team, under the clear steer of the head of school, have worked hard to improve the quality of education for all pupils. They have taken appropriate action to address the areas identified in the previous section 5 report. However, the implementation and impact of some of their actions remain at an early stage and need further time to be embedded.

p.2

Main findings

Leaders have a sharp focus on school improvement and know what actions are needed. These are set out clearly in the school’s own self-evaluation and improvement plan. They have prioritised curriculum development and established a broad and balanced curriculum. All subjects are now offered, and curriculum planning is structured and well-sequenced. As a result, pupils are beginning to build their skills and knowledge in order to meet national curriculum expectations.

p.2

Main findings

Subject leaders are enthusiastic and committed to raising standards. Some are specialists in their subject area, while others hold a personal interest and are keen to motivate and inspire pupils and staff. Training provided by the trust and senior leaders has enabled subject leaders to develop their leadership skills. While curriculum action plans are now established in all subjects, leaders’ monitoring and evaluation skills are still very embryonic and need further development. Many curriculum leaders are new to post and have not yet been able to detect what is working well and where further improvement is needed.

p.2

Main findings

Reading is a key priority for the school and is given appropriate weighting in school improvement planning. A love of reading is fostered well. The creation of a well- stocked library and competitions for pupils to win tokens to spend at the ‘book vending machine’ help enthuse and encourage pupils to read. Phonics teaching is well established, and pupils have a good grasp of how to decode and blend words. Reading books are closely matched to the sounds that pupils learn. This helps pupils build their confidence and develop their reading fluency. All staff have received phonics training so are able to support weaker readers in their classes. However, the lowest 20% of pupils do not read frequently enough to an adult in school in order to help them catch up quickly.

p.2

Main findings

The profile and time given to art, design technology and modern foreign languages has increased significantly. Planning demonstrates that teachers have identified the skills and knowledge they want pupils to learn sequentially and progressively. Pupils talk about these subjects, and say they enjoy learning new skills and vocabulary. School events, such as the whole-school art week in October 2020, add to pupils’ experiences and exposure to new knowledge. However, achievement in these subjects is not at the level it should be, especially for older pupils. This is because pupils have gaps in their basic skills and their starting points are very low. For example, Year 6 pupils are learning to count to ten, use greetings and learn simple words in French. They are therefore considerably behind in their ability to communicate in a modern foreign language. This is a requirement set out in the national curriculum by the end of key stage 2.

p.2

Main findings

Leaders have made significant progress in improving the personal, social and health education (PSHE) programme. This is now a strength of the school. Pupils have a strong understanding of how to maintain good physical and mental health. They are also well versed in discussing and debating issues because oracy is threaded across all subjects. Pupils learn to agree, build on, or challenge the views of others respectfully. This helps build their character. They demonstrate high levels of awareness and acceptance of others who are different. As a result, their levels of social responsibility are developing well. The PSHE curriculum has been established quickly but successfully. It is delivered effectively and has strengthened pupils’ personal development and reduced incidents of racism and bullying in the school.

p.3

Main findings

Governors are clear about their roles and responsibilities. They question and challenge leaders and have also focused on staff well-being during the pandemic. They have maintained regular contact with leaders and continued to monitor the progress of the school. Through pupil voice, governors are aware that the curriculum is now broader and more robust. They know where curriculum strengths lie but are also realistic that there is still more to be done. Governors appreciate being part of the trust. They use their oversight of the four schools to compare and contrast where strengths and weaknesses lie but maintain high expectations for all pupils.

p.3

Additional support

The trust has provided regular and effective support for leaders and staff to develop the quality of education. Government funding has been used well to provide coaching and support for the head of school and deputy headteacher. Support provided by the curriculum leader has ensured that key subject knowledge and skills are explicit in teachers’ planning. The deputy chief education officer (DCEO) is also clear where improvements have been made but accurately reflects that the school needs further time to embed curriculum content firmly and fully. There is a productive working relationship between the trust, governors and school leaders.

p.3

Additional support

School leaders value the advisory support commissioned from external consultants. Subject leaders have worked in groups, and as individuals, to receive tailored input and feedback. Leaders consider that this support has helped improve subject leaders’ understanding of their roles and, as a result, are more effective in carrying them out.

p.3

Evidence

During the inspection, I held meetings with the head of school and deputy headteacher, subject leaders, pupils, the chief executive officer of the multi- academy trust and those responsible for governance. The inspector also visited lessons, observed pupils reading to a member of staff, scrutinised documents and the school’s website and considered the responses to Ofsted’s parents’ and staff’s surveys.

p.4

Evidence

I am copying this letter to the chair of the governing body, the chair of the board of trustees, and the chief executive officer of the Excelsior Multi-Academy Trust, the regional schools commissioner and the director of children’s services for Birmingham. This letter will be published on the Ofsted reports website.

p.4

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion