Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Other · Ofsted letter

Setting

Inspected 18 May 2021 · published 22 Jun 2021

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

Susan Aykin

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspection datesingle source

    18 May 2021

  • Inspectorssingle source

    Susan Aykin

  • Postcode verified

    PL14 3SQ

Page 1 of 3
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+47Positivemore positive than 77% of reports of this type

In line with other reports of this type.

Praisehigh-qualitywell sequencedstrongambitioussuccessfullyeffectivelyconfidenthappy
Criticismrequires improvementnot well plannedgaps

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsWhat needs to improve positive critical
  • Findings718w+47
  • What needs to improve63w0

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No strong criticism found.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
3
Words of findings
781
about usual (typical 963)
Reading level
Fairly hard
Flesch 50, typical 48
Average sentence
16 words
Next steps
3
typical 2
Hedged sentences
8%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 92%What needs to improve 8%

Full report text

Store Street Manchester M1 2WD T 0300 123 1231 www.gov.uk/ofsted

p.1

Annie Kenton Headteacher Quethiock CofE School Quethiock Liskeard Cornwall PL14 3SQ

p.1

School

Following my visit to your school on 18 May 2021, I write on behalf of Her Majesty’s Chief Inspector of Education, Children’s Services and Skills to confirm the monitoring inspection findings. Thank you for the help you gave during the inspection and for the time you made available to discuss the actions that have been taken to improve the school since the most recent section 5 inspection.

p.1

School

The monitoring inspection was carried out under section 8(2) of the Education Act 2005 and has taken place because the school has received two successive judgements of requires improvement at its previous section 5 inspections.

p.1

School

This was the first routine inspection the school received since the COVID-19 (coronavirus) pandemic began. I discussed the impact of the pandemic with you and have taken that into account in my evaluation.

p.1

School

Having considered the evidence, I am of the opinion that at this time:

p.1

Leaders and those responsible for governance are taking effective action

in order for the school to become a good school.

p.1

Context

The temporary governing body that was established after the inspection in October 2018 has now been established as the local governing body. A special educational needs coordinator was appointed in September 2020 and a new teacher was appointed in January 2021.

p.1

Context

Leaders have revised the school’s improvement plan to take account of COVID-19.

p.2

Main findings

School and trust leaders have continued to drive improvements to the curriculum and the quality of teaching and learning. Leaders set the highest expectations for their pupils. The curriculum embraces the school’s rural context well. It also develops pupils’ knowledge of the wider world through visits to London and Cardiff. Leaders have revised the design of curriculum subjects such as science, history and geography to ensure that pupils build on their prior knowledge before moving on to new topics. However, some subjects are more established than others. The French curriculum is in its infancy. Leaders regularly check the impact of changes to the curriculum. They acknowledge that the pandemic has slowed the pace of change.

p.2

Main findings

Leaders have planned a well-structured early reading curriculum. Children in early years and pupils in Year 1 learn to read well. They make clear links between sounds and the letters they represent. Leaders have prioritised reading throughout the curriculum. Pupils across the school listen to and read high-quality texts. In addition, all subject areas focus on broadening pupils’ vocabulary to enable them to read, write and talk about their learning. Pupils use reading texts in key stage 2 as models to help them craft their writing successfully. The editing and redrafting process further enables pupils to write effectively. However, the curriculum in key stage 1 is not as well organised. Consequently, some pupils do not craft their writing with care.

p.2

Main findings

The mathematics curriculum is well sequenced in key stage 2, enabling pupils to revisit concepts before moving on to new topics. Leaders and staff enable pupils to think about the methods they use to solve problems. However, the mathematics curriculum in key stage 1 is not as well planned. As a result, some pupils have gaps in their knowledge of number, which impedes their progress.

p.2

Main findings

Governors have strong oversight of the school’s improvement programme. They hold leaders to account and monitor the impact of curriculum changes despite the obstacles posed by the pandemic.

p.2

Main findings

Pupils with special educational needs and/or disabilities access the same curriculum as other pupils. Teaching assistants and additional resources ensure that pupils are confident and happy learners.

p.2

Main findings

Pupils are eager learners and ambitious to do well. They value the pastoral support provided by staff and leaders at the school.

p.2

Additional support

The St Barnabas multi-academy trust has been instrumental in supporting improvements to the curriculum and providing suitable training for leaders and staff.

p.3

Evidence

During the inspection, I held meetings with you, other senior leaders and pupils. I also held meetings with the chair of the governing body, the chair of the board of trustees and the chief executive officer of the trust to discuss actions taken since the last inspection.

p.3

Evidence

I visited lessons in all year groups, looked at pupils’ work, listened to pupils read and reviewed school documentation, including governor minutes. I looked at 35 responses to Ofsted’s online questionnaire, Parent View, as well as eight staff questionnaires.

p.3

Evidence

I am copying this letter to the chair of the governing body, the chair of the board of trustees and the chief executive officer or equivalent of the St Barnabas multi- academy trust, the director of education for the Diocese of Truro, the regional schools commissioner and the director of children’s services for Cornwall. This letter will be published on the Ofsted reports website.

p.3

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion