Summary
What we read, and from where
Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.
- Inspection datesingle source
15 Jun 2021
- URN verified
EY448399
Deep dive
What this report says
In plain English
Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.
Tone of the report
How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.
In line with other reports of this type.
How the report reads, start to finish
Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.
Strengths
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
No standout praise found.
Concerns
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
No strong criticism found.
Next steps
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
What the report dwells on
Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.
Anatomy of the report
How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.
- Pages
- 2
- Words of findings
- 387
- longer than usual (typical 281)
- Reading level
- Hard
- Flesch 46, typical 42
- Average sentence
- 18 words
- Next steps
- 1
- typical 1
- Hedged sentences
- 19%
- “some”, “not always”, “most”…
Where the words go
Full report text
Summary of outcome
All early years providers must meet the legal requirements in the Statutory framework for the early years foundation stage . If we find that a provider is not meeting the requirements, we can take action to ensure they put matters right. On 29 April 2021, we received concerns that this provider was not meeting some of these requirements.
p.1
Summary of outcome
We carried out a regulatory visit on 5 May 2021 and found the provider was not meeting some of the requirements. We have served a welfare requirements notice. This is a legal notice that requires the provider to take the actions below within the timescales set out. The provider will be able to give parents further information about this.
p.1
Summary of outcome
ensure that staff who are the designated safeguarding leads have a secure understanding of their role and are able to implement the Local Safeguarding Children Board's procedures to safeguard children
p.1
Summary of outcome
ensure that senior staff members are not involved in other duties that take them away from the responsibilities of their role and are deployed effectively.
p.1
Summary of outcome
We will monitor the provider's response to ensure the actions are successfully completed.
p.1
Summary of outcome
On 8 June 2021 we carried out a monitoring visit and found that the actions had been met . We found that the designated safeguarding leads had improved their knowledge and understanding of child protection procedures and now understand their responsibilities. We also found that senior staff members were deployed effectively. On 4 June 2021, we received further concerns that this provider was not meeting some of the requirements legal requirements in the Statutory framework for the early years foundation stage . During the monitoring visit on 8 June 2021 we discussed the concerns and found the provider had not been meeting some of the requirements. However, the provider had already taken action to ensure the ongoing safety and well-being of children. The provider will be able to give parents further information about this.
p.1
Summary of outcome
The provider is still registered with Ofsted.
p.2
Publication of complaints
We publish details of complaints made against childminders, home childcarers and childcare providers where we or the provider have taken action in order to meet legal requirements.
p.2
Publication of complaints
We publish details of complaints on our website for a period of five years.
p.2
Publication of complaints
For further information about the complaints process please view the Concerns and complaints about childminders and childcare providers leaflet .
p.2
Discuss this inspection
Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.
Join the discussion