Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Other · Ofsted letter

Setting

Inspected 5 May 2021 · published 17 Jun 2021

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

Marie Thomas

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspection datesingle source

    5 May 2021

  • Inspectorssingle source

    Marie Thomas

  • Postcode verified

    GL1 4JU

Page 1 of 3
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+23Mostly positivemore positive than 61% of reports of this type

In line with other reports of this type.

Praiseimprovedeffectivelyhigh-qualityimprovingenjoywell supportedeffective
Criticismgapsrequires improvementdisruptiondo not know

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsWhat needs to improve positive critical
  • Findings802w+30
  • What needs to improve110w−33

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No standout praise found.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
3
Words of findings
911
about usual (typical 963)
Reading level
Hard
Flesch 45, typical 48
Average sentence
16 words
Next steps
5
typical 2
Hedged sentences
2%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 88%What needs to improve 12%

Full report text

Store Street Manchester M1 2WD T 0300 123 1231 www.gov.uk/ofsted

p.1

Simon Millington Executive headteacher St James Church of England Junior School Upton Street Gloucester Gloucestershire GL1 4JU

p.1

England Junior School

Following my visit to your school on 5 May 2021, I write on behalf of Her Majesty’s Chief Inspector of Education, Children’s Services and Skills to confirm the monitoring inspection findings. Thank you for the help you gave during the inspection and for the time you made available to discuss the actions that have been taken to improve the school since the most recent section 5 inspection.

p.1

England Junior School

The monitoring inspection was carried out under section 8(2) of the Education Act 2005 and has taken place because the school has received two successive judgements of requires improvement at its previous section 5 inspections.

p.1

England Junior School

This was the first routine inspection the school received since the COVID-19 (coronavirus) pandemic began. I discussed the impact of the pandemic with you and have taken that into account in my evaluation.

p.1

England Junior School

Having considered the evidence, I am of the opinion that at this time:

p.1

Leaders and those responsible for governance are taking effective action

in order for the school to become a good school.

p.1

Leaders and those responsible for governance are taking effective action

The school should take further action to:

p.1

Leaders and those responsible for governance are taking effective action

 identify gaps in pupils’ knowledge in foundation subjects and adapt the curriculum to ensure that essential knowledge is prioritised.

p.1

Context

Since the section 5 inspection in January 2018, the school appointed a new deputy headteacher in September 2019. The headteacher and a teacher left the school at the end of the autumn term 2020. An interim executive headteacher started work in January 2021. He has recently been appointed to the permanent position of executive headteacher. A new teacher started in January 2021. There have been four changes to membership of the governing body.

p.2

Main findings

Despite the disruption caused by the COVID-19 pandemic, leaders and those with responsibility for governance remain committed to improving the quality of education for all pupils.

p.2

Main findings

Reading is a priority for leaders. Pupils read every day and enjoy reading. During the third national lockdown, pupils who need additional support to read well did not make progress with their reading. Therefore, leaders have adapted the curriculum to provide extra help for pupils to improve their phonics knowledge. However, it is too soon to see how quickly pupils’ early reading is improving.

p.2

Main findings

Teachers choose high-quality books to help pupils find out about different writing styles. The English leader has adapted the curriculum so that pupils practise writing more frequently. Teachers support pupils to plan their writing carefully, which means that pupils are beginning to write with more complexity. Pupils’ handwriting has improved as a result of regular practice. Staff effectively support pupils with English as an additional language, so pupils learn and use new words in their writing.

p.2

Main findings

In English and mathematics, teachers have identified the knowledge that pupils forgot during national lockdowns. However, in other subjects, leaders do not know where pupils have gaps in their knowledge. For example, Year 6 pupils cannot compare features of rivers in geography because they could not remember important knowledge taught in Year 4. This means pupils are not able to build on the essential knowledge needed to make progress through the curriculum.

p.2

Main findings

The special educational needs co-ordinator and teachers correctly identify pupils who need extra help with their learning. They carefully plan appropriate learning support for individuals and groups of pupils with special educational needs and/or disabilities (SEND). For example, pupils receive additional support sessions to help them recall important knowledge. Leaders frequently check that these pupils remember what they have been taught. Consequently, pupils with SEND are well supported.

p.2

Main findings

Pupils’ attendance has improved. Nevertheless, there remains a small number of pupils who are often absent from school. Leaders are determined to support all pupils to attend school regularly. For example, the family support worker makes home visits to help families to solve problems that are preventing their child from attending school.

p.2

Main findings

Leaders are focusing on the areas that will improve the quality of education for all pupils. They have taken appropriate action to adapt improvement plans. The governing body has acted to bring about sustainable change. For example, it has strengthened links with the feeder infant school to improve pupils’ transition between the two schools.

p.3

Additional support

Leaders and those with responsibility for governance work effectively with external partners. Leaders have welcomed the support and challenge from the local authority. The executive headteacher and local authority adviser are currently working together to review the school’s development plans in light of the impact of COVID-19 restrictions.

p.3

Additional support

Teachers are making effective use of training and support from the local authority. For example, teachers are building their ability to improve pupils’ communication skills. Subject leaders from a local school and sports coaches continue to work alongside teachers to strengthen their subject knowledge.

p.3

Evidence

During the inspection, I held meetings with the executive headteacher, senior leaders, the family support worker, teachers, pupils, representatives of those responsible for governance and a representative of the local authority to discuss the actions taken since the last inspection.

p.3

Evidence

I reviewed the school improvement plan and documents relating to governance and the curriculum. I considered responses to Ofsted’s online questionnaire, Parent View, and staff questionnaires. I also observed pupils’ learning and looked at pupils’ work jointly with school leaders.

p.3

Evidence

I am copying this letter to the chair of the governing body, the director of education for the Diocese of Gloucester, the regional schools commissioner and the director of children’s services for Gloucestershire. This letter will be published on the Ofsted reports website.

p.3

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion