Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Schools & FE · School monitoring visit

Setting

Inspected — · published 17 Jun 2021

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

Tracey Reynolds (lead), Matthew Barnes

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspectorssingle source

    Matthew Barnes, Tracey Reynolds

  • Postcode verified

    PL1 3SJ

Page 1 of 5
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+48Positivemore positive than 82% of reports of this type

In line with other reports of this type.

Praiseskilledpositivestrongeffectiveknowledgeablesuccessfullyimprovedlove
Criticismseriousweaknessesat riskpoorfalling behindgapsnot yetnot clear

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsAbout the inspection positive critical

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
5
Words of findings
1,354
about usual (typical 1570)
Reading level
Fairly hard
Flesch 51, typical 47
Average sentence
15 words
Next steps
3
typical 8
Hedged sentences
4%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 98%About the inspection 2%

Full report text

Store Street Manchester M1 2WD T 0300 123 1231 www.gov.uk/ofsted

p.1

Stephanie Blake Headteacher High Street Primary Academy High Street Stonehouse Plymouth Devon PL1 3SJ

p.1

Academy

Following my visit with Tracey Reynolds, Her Majesty's Inspector (HMI), to your school on 5 and 6 May 2021, I write on behalf of Her Majesty's Chief Inspector of Education, Children's Services and Skills to confirm the outcome and inspection findings. Thank you for the help you gave during the inspection and for the time you made available to discuss the actions that have been taken since the school's most recent section 5 inspection.

p.1

Academy

The inspection was the first monitoring inspection since the school was judged to have serious weaknesses in November 2019. It was carried out under section 8 of the Education Act 2005.

p.1

Academy

This was the first routine inspection the school received since the 2020-21 COVID- 19 (coronavirus) pandemic. Inspectors discussed the impact of the pandemic with the school and have taken that into account in their evaluation.

p.1

Academy

Having considered all the evidence, I am of the opinion that at this time:

p.1

Academy

Leaders and managers are taking effective actions towards the removal of the serious weaknesses designation.

p.1

Academy

The trust's statement of action is fit for purpose.

p.1

Academy

The school's improvement plan is fit for purpose. I am copying this letter to the chair of the board of trustees, and the chief executive officer of the Reach South multi-academy trust, the regional schools commissioner and the director of children's services for Plymouth. This letter will be published on the Ofsted reports website.

p.1

Context

All pupils have now returned to learning on site. You have reviewed the impact of the recent lockdowns on how well the curriculum is being learned by pupils. There have been no changes to staffing since the remote visit in February 2021.

p.3

Context

We focused on the areas for improvement from the previous full inspection in November 2019. To do this, we looked carefully at learning in English, early reading, mathematics and geography. We considered how pupils with special educational needs and/or disabilities (SEND) access your curriculum and the improvements made to pupils’ behaviour in and around the academy. We also scrutinised the impact of leaders’ plans and the trust’s written statement of action on the quality of education.

p.3

designation

You are wholly focused on rapidly tackling the areas for improvement from the previous full inspection. With the support of the trust, you have secured knowledgeable leaders in key positions. Together, you have brought about stability at the school. You have skilfully brought staff together under a shared vision to improve outcomes for pupils. Staff feel valued. They praise how you have protected their well-being at the same time as insisting on higher expectations for pupils.

p.3

designation

Leaders’ plans, including those from the trust, are carefully linked to what is needed to improve provision further. You are held stringently to account by members of the interim executive board and executive leaders from the trust. This supports you to regularly review the difference you are making to the quality of teaching and learning. Consequently, provision is improving. The academy is well placed to improve in the future.

p.3

designation

Your actions to improve the curriculum are beginning to bear fruit. Curriculum planning is organised better. Your reasons for the choices you make are clear and appropriate. You have developed planning that focuses on improving pupils’ language successfully. As a result, teachers are now skilled at helping pupils explore unknown words. There is evidence that pupils are beginning to use some subject- specific words beyond English and mathematics. However, pupils’ use and understanding of language remains underdeveloped overall.

p.3

designation

Your actions have had the most impact on teaching. Teachers’ subject knowledge is improving. However, these improvements are more secure in some subjects than others. Despite improvements made to planning, the delivery of learning in subjects beyond English and mathematics still needs to improve. Teachers are less clear about how to secure new subject-specific knowledge in pupils’ memory in subjects such as geography and history. This is because they need greater clarity on the key ideas and concepts that should be learned, and in which order they should be taught. The pandemic has unhelpfully hampered the impact of the intended improvements to the curriculum on pupils’ learning. For example, there have been significant gaps in pupils’ access to certain subjects, such as geography. This has made it difficult for pupils to remember what they have learned in the past. In turn, this hampers their ability to take their learning forwards now that they have

p.3

designation

You have utilised useful support from the trust and the local English hub to relaunch how you teach reading. You have appointed a new leader of early reading. You have sensibly retrained staff. Leaders’ effective monitoring means there is now much greater consistency in approach. Your use of assessment is sensible. Pupils are grouped accurately according to their need. You are also better placed to identify those at risk of falling behind much sooner. Consequently, children’s reading in Reception is much improved. However, a legacy of underachievement means there are still pupils who cannot decode in the way that they should higher up the school. You have rightly identified this as a priority moving forwards.

p.4

designation

You have worked hard with staff to develop pupils’ love of reading. An appropriate priority is given within pupils’ timetables to experience books in different ways. For example, whole-class reading lessons in key stage 2 are increasingly engaging pupils’ interest in books. Pupils talk with enthusiasm about the stories teachers read to them at the end of each day, such as Kensuke’s Kingdom in Years 5 and 6.

p.4

designation

You have successfully improved provision in the early years. Indoor and outdoor learning spaces are much more engaging and carefully presented. Children are responding well to the improvements that have been made. They show sustained focus when learning through their play. A love of reading is promoted from the very start. For example, the reading area in the outdoor provision in Reception is enticing, exciting and enjoyed by children. Positive relationships are promoted effectively. Consequently, children are increasingly learning and playing with enthusiasm.

p.4

designation

The recently appointed special educational needs coordinator (SENCo) is making a positive difference. She is passionate and knowledgeable. She is building useful links with key professionals in the local area. The SENCo has rightly focused on upskilling teachers to be better at meeting pupils’ needs. As a result, teachers are making useful adaptions to how they teach during lessons. She rightly acknowledges that there is more work to do to get the consistency in practice she expects. However, more work is also needed to support teachers to think about what they teach, in what order and in smaller, manageable chunks. This will help teachers to plan learning that is accessible for pupils with SEND in all subjects across the curriculum.

p.4

designation

You and the SENCo recognise there is still a legacy from the previously poor provision for pupils with SEND. This means there are several SEND pupils whose needs have not yet been fully identified. For example, you are working through a backlog of applications for education, health and care plans. Consequently, there is more to do to ensure teachers are fully informed about the needs of pupils they teach.

p.4

designation

Your work to improve pupils’ behaviour in and around the school has been successful. You have developed a strong behaviour policy. You have provided useful training to ensure that staff are skilled at understanding pupils’ behaviour. Staff and pupils routinely follow your new higher expectations. There is an increasingly purposeful environment. Positive relationships are modelled effectively. Consequently, many pupils say that behaviour is getting better and they feel safe.

p.5

Additional support

You have made strong use of external support, which is often usefully secured through the collaborations that have been established by the trust. For example, skilled staff have been seconded into key positions in the academy. You waste no time acting on forensic feedback you are given from external advisers commissioned by the trust. This has allowed you to make sensible, timely changes to the curriculum and to your approach to teaching reading and mathematics.

p.5

Evidence

Inspectors observed the school's work, scrutinised documents and met with you, other senior leaders, the chief executive officer and director of education from the trust. They also spoke with pupils and a representative from the interim executive board.

p.5

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion