Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Early years · Early years inspection (EIF)

St Francis Pre-School

Inspected 19 May 2021 · URN 103842

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

Inadequate

Helen Penticost

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Group verified

    St Francis Pre-School Committee

  • Group reference verified

    RP518198

  • Inspection date verified

    19 May 2021

  • Inspectors verified

    Helen Penticost

  • Behaviour and attitudes verified

    Inadequate

  • Leadership and management verified

    Inadequate

  • Overall effectiveness verified

    Inadequate

  • Personal development verified

    Inadequate

  • Previous overall verified

    Good

  • Quality of education verified

    Inadequate

  • Postcode verified

    ME2 2YS

  • Name on report verified

    St Francis Pre-School

  • URN verified

    103842

Page 1 of 8
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Grade profile

Hollow rings show the previous inspection, 2016.

  • OverallInadequate
  • Behaviour and attitudesInadequate
  • Leadership and managementInadequate
  • Personal developmentInadequate
  • Quality of educationInadequate

5% of comparable inspections in the last three years were graded Inadequate (17,905 inspections).

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

−63Very criticalmore positive than 11% of reports of this type graded Inadequate
OutstandingGoodRIInadequate

Reads more critically than most reports of this type graded Inadequate.

Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.

Praiseeffectivestrongmake good progressswiftlyconsistentlyeffectivelyconcernsindependent
Criticismlackunsafenot effectivepoorat risknot consistentlynot metfailures

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsSafeguardingAbout the inspection positive critical
  • Findings730w−79
  • Safeguarding296w−30

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No standout praise found.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
8
Words of findings
995
about usual (typical 972)
Reading level
Hard
Flesch 50, typical 51
Average sentence
17 words
Next steps
5
typical 1
Hedged sentences
14%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 50%Safeguarding 20%About the inspection 30%

Full report text

Inspection of St Francis Pre-School The Vicarage, Galahad Avenue, ROCHESTER, Kent ME2 2YS

p.1

Overall effectiveness Inadequate

The quality of education Inadequate Behaviour and attitudes Inadequate Personal development Inadequate Leadership and management Inadequate Overall effectiveness at previous inspection Good

p.1

The provision is inadequate

Children are not consistently engaged in activities that challenge their learning. Some children find it difficult to settle, which has been more evident since their return to the setting, following closures due to the COVID-19 (coronavirus) pandemic. Others wander around aimlessly. However, some children settle well and concentrate at an activity for long periods. The provider has not met previous actions, which has led to significant failures in practice. The manager and staff do not receive the vital support they need to make improvements. Staff do not ensure that concerns about a child are referred to the appropriate agencies swiftly, which compromises children's safety and welfare.

p.2

The provision is inadequate

Ofsted has still not received the required documentation from the current committee members to enable suitability checks to be completed. The provider does not consistently follow safer recruitment procedures. Staff complete risk assessments. However, due to the poor leadership, these are not effective in removing hazards to children, especially in the garden. This means that children do not always play outdoors on a daily basis as the area is unsafe. Staff do not help children to gain the skills they need to be independent as they do most daily tasks for them. Children do not gain an understanding of how to manage their behaviour as they do not receive consistent messages from staff.

p.2

need to do better?

n The provider has continually failed to supply all the necessary information to Ofsted relating to new committee members so the relevant checks can be completed. There is no effective leader who is accountable to take charge and make the required improvements. This has led to poor practice and a steep decline in the quality of the provision, including safeguarding practice and safer recruitment. n Staff undertake risk assessments but are unable to remove hazards in the outdoor area due to lack of support from the provider. The outdoor area is unsafe for children and therefore they do not play in the fresh air on a daily basis. This hinders children's well-being and prevents the development of those who learn best outdoors. n Staff do not have regular opportunities for individual meetings with the manager, to help offer guidance and support, due to their overwhelming workload. As there is no clear leadership, the manager does not receive any

p.2

need to do better?

support or mentoring in her role. She and her staff have worked tirelessly to prevent the decline in the quality of the provision. However, there is a clear and negative impact on staff's welfare due to the lack of leadership. n Children do not receive clear and consistent guidance and support to help them understand how to manage their feelings and behaviour. Staff do not all manage

p.2

need to do better?

19 May 2021 children's behaviour in the same way, which gives children mixed messages. This has a negative impact on children's behaviour, and incidents occur throughout the session, which upsets children and disturbs others as they play. n Staff are able to identify gaps in children's learning from discussions with parents and their observations and assessments. They access advice from other professionals and agencies to support children with special educational needs and/or disabilities. Staff use funding to access resources specifically for individual children, following advice from professionals. For example, following advice, staff bought some resources to help encourage the sense of touch. However, staff do not have support from the provider to enable them to develop an effective system to plan for what children need to learn next. Staff lack understanding of the intent for their curriculum, and activities are not planned

p.2

need to do better?

and lack purpose. As a result, gaps in children's learning do not close swiftly. n Children take part in some activities that hold their interest. For example, some children spent considerable amounts of time bathing the dolls and dressing them. However, some children do not settle quickly, and they wander around the setting not engaging in activities for large parts of the session. Staff undertake all daily tasks that children could do for themselves, for example putting on shoes, hanging up coats, and opening packed lunch boxes and unwrapping food. This hinders children's ability to gain the skills they need to move on to their next stage in learning.

p.3

Safeguarding

The arrangements for safeguarding are not effective.

p.3

Safeguarding

The lack of clear leadership places children at risk of harm. Staff understand how to identify that a child may be at risk of harm. However, due to the overwhelming workload and lack of support from leaders, they fail to make child protection referrals swiftly. This does not safeguard children and ensure that families receive immediate support. The provider does not follow strong and effective recruitment procedures consistently. For example, references from previous employers have not been secured. This means that the provider cannot demonstrate that staff are suitable for their roles.

p.3

Due date

19 May 2021 supply all the necessary information to Ofsted relating to new committee members so the relevant checks can be completed 04/06/2021

p.3

Due date

ensure that all staff, including the designated safeguarding lead, understand the importance of making safeguarding referrals in a timely and appropriate way 04/06/2021

p.4

Due date

ensure that strong and thorough recruitment processes are followed at all times to confirm the suitability of staff 04/06/2021

p.4

Due date

take action to implement an effective risk assessment to remove hazards, with particular regard to the outdoor area 04/06/2021

p.4

Due date

ensure children have daily access to outdoor play 04/06/2021

p.4

Due date

provide the manager and staff with effective supervision and support to help them fulfil their roles and responsibilities and manage their workload 04/06/2021

p.4

Due date

ensure that staff manage children's behaviour effectively to enable children to receive consistent messages and help them understand the impact of their actions. 04/06/2021

p.4

Due date

support staff to provide a planned and purposeful curriculum to ensure that all children receive the support they need to make good progress in their learning and development 18/06/2021

p.4

Due date

19 May 2021 support staff to enable them to ensure that all children are engaged in their learning and that they receive the help to develop independence. 18/06/2021

p.4

Setting details

Unique reference number 103842 Local authority Medway Inspection number 10195549 Type of provision Childcare on non-domestic premises

p.6

Registers

Early Years Register, Compulsory Childcare Register, Voluntary Childcare Register Day care type Full day care

p.6

inspection

Total number of places 40 Number of children on roll 26 Name of registered person St Francis Pre-School Committee

p.6

reference number

Telephone number 01634 301188 Date of previous inspection 3 May 2019

p.6

Information about this early years setting

St Francis Pre-School registered in 1996 and is based in Strood, Kent. The pre- school is open each weekday from 8.30am to 3pm, during term time only. There are five staff, four of whom hold appropriate early years qualifications ranging from level 2 to level 6.

p.6

Inspection activities

n This was the first routine inspection the provider received since the COVID-19 pandemic began. The inspector discussed the impact of the pandemic with the provider and has taken that into account in their evaluation. n The deputy manager and the inspector completed a learning walk together. n The inspector carried out a joint observation with the manager, spoke with staff and interacted with children. n Parents shared their views about the setting with the inspector. n The inspection was carried out following the risk assessment process.

p.6

Inspection activities

19 May 2021 We carried out this inspection under sections 49 and 50 of the Childcare Act 2006 on the quality and standards of provision that is registered on the Early Years Register. The registered person must ensure that this provision complies with the statutory framework for children's learning, development and care, known as the early years foundation stage.

p.6

Inspection activities

19 May 2021 regulates and inspects to achieve excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children's social care, and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory and Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, further education and skills, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and other secure establishments. It assesses council children's services, and inspects services for looked after children, safeguarding and child protection.

p.7

Inspection activities

If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please telephone 0300 123 1231, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk .

p.8

Inspection activities

You may reuse this information (not including logos) free of charge in any format or medium, under the terms of the Open Government Licence. To view this licence, visit www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-government-licence/ , write to the Information Policy Team, The National Archives, Kew, London TW9 4DU, or email: psi@nationalarchives.gsi.gov.uk

p.8

Inspection activities

Interested in our work? You can subscribe to our monthly newsletter for more information and updates: http://eepurl.com/iTrDn .

p.8

Inspection activities

T: 0300 123 1231 Textphone: 0161 618 8524 E: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk W: www.gov.uk/ofsted

p.8

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion