Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Other · Ofsted report

Routes4Life Limited

Inspected 22 Apr 2021 · published 24 May 2021 · URN 146046

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

Jon Bowman

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspection date verified

    22 Apr 2021

  • Inspectorssingle source

    Jon Bowman

  • Postcode verified

    RM13 7DH

  • Name on report verified

    Routes4Life Limited

  • URN verified

    146046

Page 1 of 5
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

−3Mixedmore positive than 23% of reports of this type

In line with other reports of this type.

Praisesafesuccessfullyvery wellclearindependentpositiveeffectiveproud
Criticismlimitedunsafelacklacksconcernsbelownot yetslow

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

Findings positive critical

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No strong criticism found.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
5
Words of findings
1,231
about usual (typical 1049)
Reading level
Hard
Flesch 43, typical 45
Average sentence
18 words
Next steps
2
typical 5
Hedged sentences
2%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 100%

Full report text

Routes4Life Limited Monitoring visit report

p.1

Name of lead inspector: Jon Bowman, Her Majesty’s Inspector

p.1

Type of provider: Independent specialist college

p.1

Address: First Floor 100 Avelon Road Rainham Essex RM13 7DH Monitoring visit: Routes4Life Limited, 21-22 April 2021

p.1

Context and focus of visit

From autumn 2019, Ofsted undertook to carry out monitoring visits to independent specialist colleges newly ESFA-funded from August 2018 onwards. This monitoring visit was undertaken as part of those arrangements and as outlined in the Further education and skills inspection handbook, especially the sections entitled ‘Monitoring visits’ and ‘Monitoring visits to providers that are newly directly publicly funded’. The focus of these visits is on the themes set out below.

p.2

Context and focus of visit

Routes4Life provide training to young people aged 19 to 25 years with severe to moderate special educational needs and/or disabilities, including complex physical, health and medical conditions. At the time of the monitoring visit, there were six students, all of whom have an education, health and care plan (EHC plan). Students are from the London Borough of Havering. They follow one-year programmes on employability, community participation or supported living to build their skills, knowledge and behaviours so that they can live more independently.

p.2

Context and focus of visit

Routes4Life began teaching programmes to young adults in 2018 through a service level agreement with Corbets Tey School. Of the four directors of Routes4Life, two are governors at the school and two are employees of the school.

p.2

Context and focus of visit

Routes4Life has capacity for 10 students. As a result of the pandemic, leaders have limited student numbers to six to ensure they can maintain a safe learning environment. For periods of time over the past year, students have not been able to access community facilities and work experience placements as part of their training.

p.2

Context and focus of visit

The impact of COVID-19 (coronavirus) has been taken into account in the findings and progress judgements below.

p.2

Insufficient progress

Leaders and managers have developed the provision in response to local needs in partnership with the local authority. They have a clear rationale for creating programmes that allow students from Corbets Tey School, and others from the local area, to learn the knowledge, skills and behaviours needed to achieve their personal goals. However, leaders’ lack of experience in the education of learners with complex needs beyond school age has hampered their ability to implement their vision successfully. Monitoring visit: Routes4Life Limited, 21-22 April 2021 Leaders and managers do not plan a curriculum that is based on an assessment of what students know and can do. As a result, students do not follow a logically sequenced curriculum based on their needs that helps build their skills, knowledge and behaviours over time. Once students returned to college in April this year, leaders did not act quickly enough to ensure that students were taught the full

p.2

Insufficient progress

curriculum. Plans to reintroduce community-based activities into the curriculum are not yet in place. This inhibits the progress that students make.

p.3

Insufficient progress

Leaders and managers have been slow to take action to improve the quality of education that students receive. Leaders took positive steps in February 2020 to evaluate the provision by commissioning a review completed by a manager from the school. However, leaders and managers have not acted quickly enough on the well- considered recommendations that were made at that time.

p.3

Insufficient progress

Directors do not provide sufficient challenge to the leadership team on the quality of education that students receive. The board lacks expertise in the post-19 special educational needs sector. Leaders and managers recognise the need to increase the capacity of the board so that it provides effective challenge and support to develop the provision further.

p.3

Insufficient progress

Leaders and managers do not ensure that staff teach topics over time that are linked closely to the outcomes and targets for students set out in their EHC plans. They have only recently begun to align these. As a result, leaders and managers do not have a secure oversight of the progress that students make in achieving their personal goals.

p.3

Insufficient progress

Leaders and managers have developed a few opportunities that enable students on the employability pathway to develop the skills they need for employment. Through operating an online shop using donated goods, students develop their skills in working online. They learn how to share screens, send and receive emails and list items in an inventory. Students are proud of their achievements and take delight in sharing these.

p.3

Insufficient progress

Teaching assistants support students well. They know the students very well. They use gestures, sign language, symbols, objects of reference and electronic communication devices to good effect. As a result, students can communicate their thoughts, choices and ideas as independently as possible. Monitoring visit: Routes4Life Limited, 21-22 April 2021 Leaders and managers responded well to the challenges of supporting students and their families during the pandemic. This ensured that students remained engaged in learning online or through work packs to complete at home. Students enjoy attending Routes4Life and say that staff ‘make you happy when you are sad!’. Students say they enjoyed the online cooking lesson where, with the support of their parents, they made jacket potatoes with cheese. Parents value the support they have personally received from staff throughout the academic year. They rightly say

p.3

Insufficient progress

that ‘staff go the extra mile’ to support them.

p.4

Reasonable progress

Leaders, managers and staff provide high levels of care for students. The college is a safe place for students to learn. Students know who to turn to should they feel unsafe or have any concerns.

p.4

Reasonable progress

Students on the employability pathway understand key concepts such as to how to stay safe online by not revealing personal information, including name, address or bank account details. However, teaching students of the dangers of radicalisation and extremism is not well embedded in the curriculum.

p.4

Reasonable progress

Leaders have appropriate policies in place to support and safeguard students. The policies give clear guidance for staff to follow. For example, the intimate care policy gives clear guidance to staff on how to successfully carry out intimate care with students. Leaders apply safe recruitment and selection procedures that ensure that staff are suitable to work with vulnerable young adults.

p.4

Reasonable progress

Directors do not scrutinise safeguarding arrangements well enough because safeguarding incidents are not routinely reported at board level. As a result, they do not have up-to-date information on any safeguarding incidents that occur and how well they have been managed. Monitoring visit: Routes4Life Limited, 21-22 April 2021 regulates and inspects to achieve excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children’s social care, and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory and Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, further education and skills, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and other secure establishments. It assesses council children’s services, and inspects services for children looked after, safeguarding and child protection.

p.4

Reasonable progress

If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please telephone 0300 123 1231, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk .

p.5

Reasonable progress

You may reuse this information (not including logos) free of charge in any format or medium, under the terms of the Open Government Licence. To view this licence, visit www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-government-licence/ , write to the Information Policy Team, The National Archives, Kew, London TW9 4DU, or email: psi@nationalarchives.gsi.gov.uk .

p.5

Reasonable progress

Interested in our work? You can subscribe to our monthly newsletter for more information and updates: http://eepurl.com/iTrDn .

p.5

Reasonable progress

T: 0300 123 1231 Textphone: 0161 618 8524 E: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk W: www.gov.uk/ofsted

p.5

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion