Social care · Children's home inspection (SCCIF)
Children's Home run by ROC Northwest Limited in Lancashire
Summary
Marie Cordingley (lead), Rachel Springford
What we read, and from where
Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.
- Group verified
ROC Northwest Limited
- Inspection date verified
21 Apr 2021
- Inspectors verified
Marie Cordingley, Rachel Springford
- Helped and protected verified
Requires improvement to be good
- Leadership and management verified
Requires improvement to be good
- Overall effectiveness verified
Requires improvement to be good
- Name on report verified
2527558
- URN verified
2527558
Deep dive
What this report says
In plain English
Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.
Grade profile
Each judgement on its scale, weakest to strongest.
- OverallRI to be good
- Helped and protectedRI to be good
- Leadership and managementRI to be good
13% of comparable inspections in the last three years were graded Requires improvement to be good (12,716 inspections).
Tone of the report
How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.
In line with other reports of this type graded Requires improvement to be good.
Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.
How the report reads, start to finish
Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.
Strengths
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- There have been some positive outcomes for children, including one child’s successful transition to foster care which was supported well by managers and staff. p.2
- However, there are no serious or widespread failures that result in their welfare not being safeguarded or promoted. p.1
- In both cases, partnership working with external professionals could be more effective in ensuring that children receive effective support. p.2
Concerns
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- However, several expressed concerns about a lack of communication, and about the difficulties in actually contacting the home due to a poor phone signal and lack of internet. p.3
- While the manager has had ongoing discussions with the placing authority and raised concerns, she has failed to escalate the matters sufficiently, despite the significant timescales involved. p.3
- Failure to notify Ofsted of significant events impedes our ability to monitor services effectively and, therefore, fails to promote children’s safety and well-being. p.4
- In some examples, Inspection report children’s home: 2527558 3 plans do not contain up-to-date information, and they lack clarity about measures required to protect children from harm. p.2
- One child’s placing authority has failed to meet their statutory responsibilities in terms of pathway planning and education. p.3
Next steps
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- The registered person must notify HMCI and each other relevant person without delay if— p.7
- The registered person should ensure that children receive practical, individualised support to prepare for their move away from the home. p.8
- This support should take into account the child’s individual strengths and needs. p.8
- The registered person should ensure that children who are not in education or training are engaged in suitable structured activities relevant to their individual needs and interests. p.8
- The registered person should ensure that all sanctions are subject to systems of regular scrutiny to ensure that their use is fair and proportionate and that they are relevant and restorative in nature. p.8
- The registered person should ensure that the independent person makes efforts to speak with children and obtain their views during the independent person’s visits to the home. p.8
What the report dwells on
Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.
Leadership & governance5
“The effectiveness of leaders and managers requires improvement to be good” p.1
Anatomy of the report
How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.
- Pages
- 10
- Words of findings
- 1,892
- about usual (typical 1899)
- Reading level
- Hard
- Flesch 48, typical 50
- Average sentence
- 17 words
- Next steps
- 6
- typical 8
- Hedged sentences
- 9%
- “some”, “not always”, “most”…
Where the words go
Full report text
Inspection report children’s home: 2527558 1 Registered provider: ROC Northwest Limited Full inspection Inspected under the social care common inspection framework
p.1
Information about this children’s home
This home is registered to provide care and accommodation for up to five children who may have emotional or behavioural needs. There were three children living in the home at the time of the inspection.
p.1
Information about this children’s home
The home is one of a number of homes operated by a large, private organisation.
p.1
Information about this children’s home
There is currently no registered manager in place. A new manager has been appointed and has submitted an application to register with Ofsted.
p.1
Information about this children’s home
Due to COVID-19 (coronavirus), at the request of the Secretary of State, we suspended all routine inspections of social care providers on 17 March 2020.
p.1
Overall experiences and progress of
children and young people, taking into account
p.1
good
How well children and young people are helped and protected requires improvement to be good
p.1
good
The effectiveness of leaders and managers requires improvement to be good
p.1
good
The children’s home is not yet delivering good help and care for children and young people. However, there are no serious or widespread failures that result in their welfare not being safeguarded or promoted.
p.1
good
Overall judgement at last inspection: Not applicable
p.1
Enforcement action since last inspection: Not applicable
Inspection report children’s home: 2527558 2
p.2
improvement to be good
Children’s progress is mixed. They have made good progress in some areas but have not done as well in others. There have been some positive outcomes for children, including one child’s successful transition to foster care which was supported well by managers and staff.
p.2
improvement to be good
Staff demonstrate an understanding of children’s individual needs, and they are able to discuss children’s day-to-day care and support. However, shortfalls in some aspects of care planning were identified. For example, information in relation to a child’s medication regimen lacked sufficient detail. In another example, there was a lack of information about how a child had been impacted by a bereavement.
p.2
improvement to be good
One child has been without education or training for a significant amount of time. Another child has faced personal barriers to learning. In both cases, partnership working with external professionals could be more effective in ensuring that children receive effective support. In addition, arrangements for home-based learning lack clarity.
p.2
improvement to be good
Children’s care plans describe the support they require to maintain valued relationships. When there have been difficulties arranging face-to-face contact with families due to COVID-19, staff have tried to support children to engage in video calls with their families. However, this has not always been possible due to limitations with the home’s internet.
p.2
improvement to be good
The home has been without a reliable internet connection for several months. This has had a demonstrable impact on children’s experiences and progress. Social workers and an education professional raised concerns about this matter. Also, children have frequently raised the matter with managers and staff. One child said that the lack of internet was getting him down.
p.2
improvement to be good
One child is due to transition to independence in the near future. Staff are supporting him to develop his independence skills on a day-to-day basis. However, there is no clear plan in place and there has been a failure to identify his individual needs, strengths and progress. This means that the child may not receive effective support to prepare for his transition.
p.2
improvement to be good
Managers and staff are provided with safeguarding training as part of their mandatory learning programme. When safeguarding concerns are identified, appropriate action is taken, including prompt referral to the relevant authorities.
p.2
improvement to be good
Identified risks are assessed and risk management plans are developed to provide staff with guidance. Risk management plans vary in quality. In some examples, Inspection report children’s home: 2527558 3 plans do not contain up-to-date information, and they lack clarity about measures required to protect children from harm.
p.2
improvement to be good
Risks relating to one child’s vulnerability to exploitation have reduced since his admission. This is positive progress. However, a family member expressed concern that the current level of direct work being carried out with the child is not sufficient to help him develop a greater understanding of personal safety or safe relationships and, therefore, may not support his safer future.
p.3
improvement to be good
Records of physical restraints are completed to a good standard. The manager monitors restraints effectively to ensure that they are appropriate and carried out in a safe manner. There is a good level of reflection with both children and staff which helps to ensure that any potential learning is identified.
p.3
improvement to be good
At times, staff may use consequences to help children learn about the impact of their behaviours. Records demonstrate that the use of consequences is inconsistent and, in the two examples seen, it is not fair or proportionate. Managers have recognised this is an area for improvement, and they have recently carried out some workshop-style training with staff.
p.3
improvement to be good
Relationships between children are, generally, positive. Staff manage incidents between children well. There are examples of positive, restorative work carried out with children to assist them in maintaining their friendships, following poor behaviours towards each other.
p.3
good
The home is currently without a registered manager. A new manager has been appointed and has submitted an application to register with Ofsted. There has been a well-planned handover, with the outgoing manager maintaining some input and providing mentoring to her successor.
p.3
good
Feedback from external professionals who have worked with the home was mixed. Some professionals spoke highly of the home and expressed satisfaction with the care provided. However, several expressed concerns about a lack of communication, and about the difficulties in actually contacting the home due to a poor phone signal and lack of internet.
p.3
good
One child’s placing authority has failed to meet their statutory responsibilities in terms of pathway planning and education. While the manager has had ongoing discussions with the placing authority and raised concerns, she has failed to escalate the matters sufficiently, despite the significant timescales involved. As a result, the child’s best interests have not been promoted.
p.3
good
There has been a large turnover of staff which has resulted in a general lack of experience across the team. Currently, no staff other than the manager have an appropriate qualification in children’s residential care. All staff have, however, Inspection report children’s home: 2527558 4 benefited from a mandatory training programme, which includes safeguarding and first aid.
p.3
good
Currently, the home is without internet for the majority of time. This has impacted on children’s experiences, particularly in relation to having time with friends and family and on education. The manager has attempted to resolve the matter for several months but has not received sufficient support from the provider to do so. Ofsted have been advised that a solution has now been identified and that the matter should be rectified in coming weeks. However, it is of concern that the issue has been allowed to continue for such a significant amount of time.
p.4
good
There have been some significant incidents within the home which have not been reported to Ofsted. Failure to notify Ofsted of significant events impedes our ability to monitor services effectively and, therefore, fails to promote children’s safety and well-being. Inspection report children’s home: 2527558 5
p.4
Statutory requirements
This section sets out the actions that the registered person(s) must take to meet the Care Standards Act 2000, Children’s Homes (England) Regulations 2015 and the ‘Guide to the children’s homes regulations including the quality standards’. The registered person(s) must comply within the given timescales.
p.5
Requirement Due date
In meeting the quality standards, the registered person must, and must ensure that staff—
p.5
Requirement Due date
seek to involve each child’s placing authority effectively in the child’s care, in accordance with the child’s relevant plans;
p.5
Requirement Due date
seek to secure the input and services required to meet each child’s needs; and
p.5
Requirement Due date
if the registered person considers, or staff consider, a placing authority’s or a relevant person’s performance or response to be inadequate in relation to their role, challenge the placing authority or the relevant person to seek to ensure that each child’s needs are met in accordance with the child’s relevant plans.
p.5
Requirement Due date
The protection of children standard is that children are protected from harm and enabled to keep themselves safe.
p.5
Requirement Due date
In particular, the standard in paragraph (1) requires the registered person to ensure—
p.5
Requirement Due date
assess whether each child is at risk of harm, taking into account information in the child’s relevant plans, and, if necessary, make arrangements to reduce the risk of any harm to the child; and
p.5
Requirement Due date
help each child to understand how to keep safe.
p.5
Requirement Due date
(Regulation 12 (1) (2)(a)(i)(ii)) 4 June 2021 Inspection report children’s home: 2527558 6 The leadership and management standard is that the registered person enables, inspires and leads a culture in relation to the children’s home that—
p.5
Requirement Due date
helps children aspire to fulfil their potential; and
p.6
Requirement Due date
In particular, the standard in paragraph (1) requires the registered person to—
p.6
Requirement Due date
lead and manage the home in a way that is consistent with the approach and ethos, and delivers the outcomes, set out in the home’s statement of purpose;
p.6
Requirement Due date
ensure that staff have the experience, qualifications and skills to meet the needs of each child;
p.6
Requirement Due date
ensure that the home has sufficient staff to provide care for each child;
p.6
Requirement Due date
ensure that the home’s workforce provides continuity of care to each child;
p.6
Requirement Due date
understand the impact that the quality of care provided in the home is having on the progress and experiences of each child and use this understanding to inform the development of the quality of care provided in the home;
p.6
Requirement Due date
demonstrate that practice in the home is informed and improved by taking into account and acting on—
p.6
Requirement Due date
feedback on the experiences of children, including complaints received; and
p.6
Requirement Due date
use monitoring and review systems to make continuous improvements in the quality of care provided in the home.
p.6
Requirement Due date
(Regulation 13 (1)(a)(b) (2)(a)(c)(d)(e)(f)(g)(ii)(h)) 4 June 2021
p.6
Requirement Due date
The care planning standard is that children—
p.6
Requirement Due date
receive effectively planned care in or through the children’s home.
p.6
Requirement Due date
In particular, the standard in paragraph (1) requires the registered person to ensure— 4 June 2021 Inspection report children’s home: 2527558 7 that arrangements are in place to—
p.6
Requirement Due date
plan for, and help, each child to prepare to leave the home or to move into adult care in a way that is consistent with arrangements agreed with the child’s placing authority;
p.7
Requirement Due date
that, subject to regulation 22 (contact and access to communications), contact between each child and the child’s parents, relatives and friends, is promoted in accordance with the child’s relevant plans.
p.7
Requirement Due date
The registered person must notify HMCI and each other relevant person without delay if—
p.7
Requirement Due date
a child is involved in or subject to, or is suspected of being involved in or subject to, sexual exploitation;
p.7
Requirement Due date
an incident requiring police involvement occurs in relation to a child which the registered person considers to be serious;
p.7
Requirement Due date
there is an allegation of abuse against the home or a person working there;
p.7
Requirement Due date
a child protection enquiry involving a child —
p.7
Requirement Due date
concludes (in which case, the notification must include the outcome of the child protection enquiry); or
p.7
Requirement Due date
there is any other incident relating to a child which the registered person considers to be serious.
p.7
Requirement Due date
(Regulation 40 (4)(a)(b)(c)(d)(i)(ii)(e)) 4 June 2021 Inspection report children’s home: 2527558 8
p.7
Recommendations
The registered person should ensure that children receive practical, individualised support to prepare for their move away from the home. This support should take into account the child’s individual strengths and needs. (‘Guide to the children’s homes regulations including the quality standards’, page 17, paragraph 3.27) The registered person should ensure that children who are not in education or training are engaged in suitable structured activities relevant to their individual needs and interests. (‘Guide to the children’s homes regulations including the quality standards’, page 28, paragraph 5.15) The registered person should ensure that all sanctions are subject to systems of regular scrutiny to ensure that their use is fair and proportionate and that they are relevant and restorative in nature. (‘Guide to the children’s home regulations including the quality standards’, page 46, paragraph 9.36)
p.8
Recommendations
The registered person should ensure that the independent person makes efforts to speak with children and obtain their views during the independent person’s visits to the home. (‘Guide to the children’s home regulations including the quality standards’, page 65, paragraph 15.5)
p.8
Information about this inspection
Inspectors have looked closely at the experiences and progress of children and young people, using the ‘Social care common inspection framework’. This inspection was carried out under the Care Standards Act 2000 to assess the effectiveness of the service, how it meets the core functions of the service as set out in legislation, and to consider how well it complies with the Children’s Homes (England) Regulations 2015 and the ‘Guide to the children’s homes regulations including the quality standards’. Inspection report children’s home: 2527558 9
p.8
Children’s home details
Registered provider: ROC Northwest Limited
p.9
Children’s home details
Registered provider address: 5th Floor, Metropolitan House, 3 Darkes Lane, Potters Bar, EN6 1AG
p.9
Inspectors
Marie Cordingley, Social Care Inspector Rachel Springford, Social Care Inspector Inspection report children’s home: 2527558 10 to achieve excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children’s social care, and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory and Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, further education and skills, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and other secure establishments. It assesses council children’s services, and inspects services for children looked after, safeguarding and child protection.
p.9
Inspectors
If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please telephone 0300 123 1231, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk . You may reuse this information (not including logos) free of charge in any format or medium, under the terms of the Open Government Licence. To view this licence, visit www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-government-licence , write to the Information Policy Team, The National Archives, Kew, London TW9 4DU, or email: psi@nationalarchives.gsi.gov.uk .
p.10
Inspectors
Interested in our work? You can subscribe to our monthly newsletter for more information and updates: http://eepurl.com/iTrDn .
p.10
Inspectors
T: 0300 123 1231 Textphone: 0161 618 1231 E: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk W: www.gov.uk/ofsted
p.10
Discuss this inspection
Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.
Join the discussion