Social care · Children's home inspection (SCCIF)
Children's home run by Oracle Care Limited in Central Bedfordshire
Summary
What we read, and from where
Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.
- Group verified
Oracle Care Limited
- Inspection date verified
14 Apr 2021
- Inspectors verified
Karen Gillingwater
- Helped and protected verified
Good
- Leadership and management verified
Requires improvement to be good
- Overall effectiveness verified
Good
- Name on report verified
SC356327
- URN verified
SC356327
Deep dive
What this report says
In plain English
Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.
Grade profile
Hollow rings show the previous inspection, 2018.
- OverallGood
- Helped and protectedGood
- Leadership and managementRI to be good
70% of comparable inspections in the last three years were graded Good (12,716 inspections).
Tone of the report
How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.
Reads more critically than most reports of this type graded Good.
Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.
How the report reads, start to finish
Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.
Strengths
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
Concerns
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
Next steps
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- This relates to managers not ensuring that a child’s risk assessment included the risk of self-harm. 23 May 2021 p.6
- The registered person should ensure that staff are familiar with the home’s policies on record-keeping and understand the importance of careful, objective, and clear recording. p.7
- Staff should record information on individual children in a non-stigmatising way that distinguishes between fact, opinion and third-party information. p.7
- Information about the child must always be recorded in a way that will be helpful to the child. p.7
- The registered person should ensure that the home is a nurturing and supportive environment and that furniture that is damaged and worn is promptly repaired or replaced. p.7
What the report dwells on
Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.
Leadership & governance3
“Management oversight is sometimes poor.” p.4
Anatomy of the report
How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.
- Pages
- 9
- Words of findings
- 1,418
- about usual (typical 1319)
- Reading level
- Fairly hard
- Flesch 56, typical 51
- Average sentence
- 17 words
- Next steps
- 5
- typical 4
- Hedged sentences
- 10%
- “some”, “not always”, “most”…
Where the words go
Full report text
Inspection report children’s home: SC356327 1 SC356327 Registered provider: Oracle Care Limited Full inspection Inspected under the social care common inspection framework
p.1
Information about this children’s home
This home is owned and operated by a private company. It is registered to provide care and accommodation for up to three children aged eight to 18 years who may have complex social and emotional difficulties and may require attachment-aware, trauma-informed care and support.
p.1
Information about this children’s home
Due to the COVID-19 (coronavirus) pandemic, at the request of the Secretary of State, we suspended all routine inspections of social care providers on 17 March 2020.
p.1
Information about this children’s home
We last visited this setting on 2 November 2020 to carry out a quality assurance visit. The report is published on the Ofsted website.
p.1
Overall experiences and progress of
children and young people, taking into account
p.1
good
How well children and young people are helped and protected good
p.1
good
The effectiveness of leaders and managers requires improvement to be good
p.1
good
The children’s home provides effective services that meet the requirements for good.
p.1
good
Overall judgement at last inspection: not judged
p.1
good
Enforcement action since last inspection: none Inspection report children’s home: SC356327 2
p.1
Inspection date Inspection type Inspection judgement
07/01/2019 Interim Not judged 07/11/2018 Full Inadequate 11/01/2018 Full Outstanding 28/02/2017 Interim Improved effectiveness Inspection report children’s home: SC356327 3
p.2
Overall experiences and progress of children and young people: good
There is one child currently living at the home. The child has lived there since June 2020. The child’s social worker told the inspector that the child has a good relationship with staff which has enabled him to feel safe and to make progress. Staff ensure that the child has their identity, culture and beliefs met. The child’s social worker has praised the staff on their efforts to meet the child’s cultural needs.
p.3
Overall experiences and progress of children and young people: good
When the child first came to live at the home, he was not attending school. The staff have helped him to understand the value of education and, as a consequence, is now attending school.
p.3
Overall experiences and progress of children and young people: good
Staff work with a range of health professionals, including the organisation’s clinical team. This coordinated approach to healthcare means that children’s physical and emotional health needs are met.
p.3
Overall experiences and progress of children and young people: good
The communal areas of the home are well furnished and decorated, and the kitchen and lounge are pleasant places where the child can sit with staff to eat a meal and watch television. However, some furniture in the home is damaged and has not been promptly repaired or replaced. This detracts from the homely feel and risks impacting on the child’s self-esteem.
p.3
Overall experiences and progress of children and young people: good
One child’s placement ended abruptly shortly after they moved into the home. Despite all the pre-admission planning, the needs of this child and the children living in the house at the time were not compatible and a significant safeguarding incident occurred. As a result, the new child and another child were moved at short notice to other homes. The manager has learned from this experience and brought in new pre-admission checks.
p.3
Overall experiences and progress of children and young people: good
Staff do not have the most up-to-date plans for the current child and the manager has not been successful in escalating his concerns with the placing local authority. Staff regularly update the child’s internal placement plans by using available information. However, staff do not consult the child on their plan or set targets for the child to achieve. As a result, staff are missing opportunities to involve the child in decisions about his care.
p.3
How well children and young people are helped and protected: good
Staff are skilled at de-escalating children’s behaviours. Detailed risk assessments give staff clear guidance about the child’s triggers for displaying complex and challenging behaviours. These include the child’s views about his own triggers and strategies that staff can use to de-escalate these behaviours. Since the visit in November 2020, there has been one incident when restraint has been used. However, risk assessments do not always include details around self-harm. This creates a shortfall in evidencing how staff manage all known risks. Inspection report children’s home: SC356327 4 When children go missing or are absent without consent, staff follow children’s risk assessments and missing-from-care protocols. When children return to the home, they are welcomed back and staff say they were worried about them. However, on one occasion when a child returned home, they became ill and vomited in their
p.3
How well children and young people are helped and protected: good
bedroom and then collapsed in the bathroom. Although staff monitored the child throughout the night and the child was fine by the morning, they did not consider seeking medical advice or help when the child was vomiting and collapsed.
p.4
How well children and young people are helped and protected: good
A social worker has praised the actions taken by managers and staff when they became concerned about a child’s friendships in the community. Managers and staff swiftly liaised with the local police and shared information with the child’s school. This proactive approach and strong partnership working played a key role in keeping the child safe.
p.4
How well children and young people are helped and protected: good
Managers ensure that the home’s location risk assessment is regularly updated with information from the local police. As a result, staff are constantly updated about known and emerging risks to children that are within the vicinity of the home.
p.4
good
There have been three changes in managers at the home in the last four months and this has led to some inconsistency in practice. The current manager has been in post six weeks and has applied to register with Ofsted. The manager has a clear vision for the home and is aware of the areas of strength and areas of development for the home. He has started to make changes to processes and systems, with the aim of enhancing the quality of care offered to children.
p.4
good
Management oversight is sometimes poor. For example, managers do not always review incident reports. This is a missed opportunity to review staff practice and to improve the quality of care for children. Managers have not ensured that the statement of purpose is brought up to date. This means that the regulator and local authority commissioners do not have accurate information about staffing.
p.4
good
Daily records are not always written in a way that helps the child to understand his life story. Some staff complete the child’s daily records with minimal information and in a way that is impersonal and jargonistic. This means the child does not have a balanced record of his time in the home that he can look at in the future and which may help him to build resilience.
p.4
good
Managers have not ensured that all members of staff have received training in attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD), despite this being a known condition for one child. Out of 10 members of staff, only three members of staff have received training. This leaves seven staff without essential knowledge about how the child experiences the world and how they can best support him. Inspection report children’s home: SC356327 5 Staff report that they feel supported by the new manager and deputy manager. Staff receive regular supervision. The home is fully staffed and throughout the COVID-19 pandemic, children have been cared for by a familiar staff team. Inspection report children’s home: SC356327 6
p.4
Statutory requirements
This section sets out the actions that the registered person(s) must take to meet the Care Standards Act 2000, Children’s Homes (England) Regulations 2015 and the ‘Guide to the children’s homes regulations including the quality standards’. The registered person(s) must comply within the given timescales.
p.6
Requirement Due date
The protection of children standard is that children are protected from harm and enabled to keep themselves safe.
p.6
Requirement Due date
In particular, the standard in paragraph (1) requires the registered person to ensure— that staff—
p.6
Requirement Due date
assess whether each child is at risk of harm, taking into account information in the child’s relevant plans, and, if necessary, make arrangements to reduce the risk of any harm to the child;
p.6
Requirement Due date
have the skills to identify and act upon signs that a child is at risk of harm;
p.6
Requirement Due date
take effective action whenever there is a serious concern about a child’s welfare. (Regulation 12 (1) (2)(a)(i)(iii)(vi))
p.6
Requirement Due date
This relates to managers not ensuring that a child’s risk assessment included the risk of self-harm. 23 May 2021
p.6
Requirement Due date
The leadership and management standard is that the registered person enables, inspires and leads a culture in relation to the children’s home that—
p.6
Requirement Due date
helps children aspire to fulfil their potential; and promotes their welfare.
p.6
Requirement Due date
In particular, the standard in paragraph (1) requires the registered person to—
p.6
Requirement Due date
ensure that staff have the experience, qualifications and skills to meet the needs of each child;
p.6
Requirement Due date
use monitoring and review systems to make continuous improvements in the quality of care provided in the home. (Regulation 13 (1)(a)(b) (2)(c)(h)) 23 May 2021 Inspection report children’s home: SC356327 7 This relates to staff receiving training in ADHD, reviewing the recording of incidents involving children and updating the statement of purpose.
p.6
Recommendations
The registered person should ensure that staff are familiar with the home’s policies on record-keeping and understand the importance of careful, objective, and clear recording. Staff should record information on individual children in a non-stigmatising way that distinguishes between fact, opinion and third-party information. Information about the child must always be recorded in a way that will be helpful to the child. (‘Guide to the children’s homes regulations including the quality standards’, page 62, paragraph 14.4)
p.7
Recommendations
The registered person should ensure that the home is a nurturing and supportive environment and that furniture that is damaged and worn is promptly repaired or replaced. (‘Guide to the children’s homes regulations including the quality standards’, page 15, paragraph 13.9)
p.7
Information about this inspection
Inspectors have looked closely at the experiences and progress of children and young people, using the ‘Social care common inspection framework’. This inspection was carried out under the Care Standards Act 2000 to assess the effectiveness of the service, how it meets the core functions of the service as set out in legislation, and to consider how well it complies with the Children’s Homes (England) Regulations 2015 and the ‘Guide to the children’s homes regulations including the quality standards’. Inspection report children’s home: SC356327 8
p.7
Children’s home details
Registered provider: Oracle Care Limited
p.8
Children’s home details
Registered provider address: Suites 1 & 5, Riverside Business Centre, Foundry Lane, Milford, Belper, Derbyshire DE56 0RN
p.8
Children’s home details
Responsible individual: Elisabeth Brownlees
p.8
Inspector
Karen Gillingwater, Social Care Inspector Inspection report children’s home: SC356327 9 to achieve excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children’s social care, and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory and Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, further education and skills, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and other secure establishments. It assesses council children’s services, and inspects services for children looked after, safeguarding and child protection.
p.8
Inspector
If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please telephone 0300 123 1231, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk . You may reuse this information (not including logos) free of charge in any format or medium, under the terms of the Open Government Licence. To view this licence, visit http://www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-government-licence , write to the Information Policy Team, The National Archives, Kew, London TW9 4DU, or email: psi@nationalarchives.gsi.gov.uk .
p.9
Inspector
Interested in our work? You can subscribe to our monthly newsletter for more information and updates: http://eepurl.com/iTrDn .
p.9
Inspector
T: 0300 123 1231 Textphone: 0161 618 8524 E: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk W: http://www.gov.uk/ofsted
p.9
Discuss this inspection
Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.
Join the discussion