Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Other · Ofsted report

Setting

Inspected — · published 12 May 2021

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

Jean Watt (lead), Tim Jenner

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspectorssingle source

    Jean Watt, Tim Jenner

  • Postcode verified

    YO43 3JF

Page 1 of 3
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

−26Mixedmore positive than 12% of reports of this type

Reads more critically than most reports of this type.

Praisepositivelywell supportedeffectivelyclear
Criticismdisruptionlimitedmissedgapsstruggle

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsAbout the inspectionWhat needs to improve positive critical
  • Findings840w−26
  • What needs to improve161w0

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No standout praise found.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No strong criticism found.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
3
Words of findings
985
about usual (typical 1049)
Reading level
Hard
Flesch 49, typical 45
Average sentence
15 words
Next steps
6
typical 5
Hedged sentences
14%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 82%What needs to improve 16%About the inspection 3%

Full report text

Richard Harrison Headteacher The Market Weighton School Spring Road Market Weighton East Yorkshire YO43 3JF

p.1

Additional, remote monitoring inspection of The Market Weighton School

Following my remote inspection with Jean Watt, Her Majesty’s Inspector (HMI), of your school on 25 March 2021, I write on behalf of Her Majesty’s Chief Inspector of Education, Children’s Services and Skills to confirm the findings. Thank you for the help you gave during the inspection and for the time you made available to discuss the actions that have been taken to provide education to all pupils during the current circumstances.

p.1

Additional, remote monitoring inspection of The Market Weighton School

This monitoring inspection was conducted under section 8 (2) of the Education Act 2005 (as amended) and in accordance with Ofsted’s published procedures for visiting schools while routine inspections remain temporarily suspended. It was additional to the usual monitoring process for schools that are judged to require improvement.

p.1

Additional, remote monitoring inspection of The Market Weighton School

This monitoring inspection was carried out remotely. As such, the range of evidence available to inspectors was narrower than would normally be the case during an on- site inspection. As a result, this letter provides a more limited level of assurance than our usual monitoring reports.

p.1

Additional, remote monitoring inspection of The Market Weighton School

The inspection took place because the school has received three successive judgements of requires improvement. The school’s most recent section 5 inspection took place in December 2018.

p.1

Additional, remote monitoring inspection of The Market Weighton School

Having considered all the evidence and taking into account the impact of COVID-19 (coronavirus) on the school, I am of the opinion that at this time:

p.1

Leaders and those responsible for governance are taking effective action

to provide education in the current circumstances.

p.1

Leaders and those responsible for governance are taking effective action

Leaders and those responsible for governance should take further action to: Ofsted

p.1

Leaders and those responsible for governance are taking effective action

Store Street Manchester M1 2WD T 0300 123 1231 www.gov.uk/ofsted  provide support, challenge and training which builds the expertise of curriculum leaders so that they identify the knowledge pupils need to learn at each stage  quality assure the content and breadth of the curriculum.

p.1

Context

 Since the previous inspection, the school has appointed an additional deputy headteacher.  At the start of the spring term 2021, when the school was closed to most pupils, around 12% of pupils were educated on the school site (which includes an enhanced resource provision for pupils with autism spectrum disorder). This included around 75% of pupils with an education, health and care (EHC) plan and around 33% of vulnerable pupils.  At the time of this inspection, a very small number of Year 11 pupils were being educated at home due to COVID-19 restrictions.

p.2

Main findings

 During recent school closures, a high proportion of pupils with an EHC plan were educated on site. For pupils who learned from home, attendance and participation in remote learning were high. This has allowed a smooth return to school for most pupils.  You have minimised disruption to the planned curriculum wherever possible. In some subjects, the order of teaching has changed. For example, in English and design and technology, some topics will now be taught later in the year. There are clear, well-thought-out reasons for these changes. In physical education (PE), teaching has focused on maintaining pupils’ physical fitness and well-being. The PE curriculum is being adapted to address any missed content in the summer term 2021.  Since the previous inspection, leaders have been reviewing curriculum plans in most subjects. Leaders have particularly focused on English, mathematics and science. In some subjects, curriculum plans are not as well developed

p.2

Main findings

because they do not identify the important knowledge that pupils should learn over time.  Since pupils have returned to school fully, teachers have used a wide range of assessments to identify gaps in pupils’ knowledge. These assessments have informed the changes that teachers have made to the curriculum. For example, in mathematics, teachers have focused on providing extra practice of previous content to develop pupils’ fluency.  You have planned two rounds of formal assessments to inform decisions about grades for pupils in Year 11. You have continued to support Year 11 pupils, for example by providing extra catch-up sessions at the end of the school day.  Reading is a priority in your school. During COVID-19 restrictions, you continued to prioritise reading for pupils who were learning from home. Leaders use a range of reading interventions to help develop pupils’ reading. Pupils who struggle to read receive regular support. You are now beginning to

p.2

Main findings

develop strategies that support pupils’ reading in all subjects.  Your approach to remote learning is well established. Pupils who are currently learning remotely access ‘live’ lessons. They can interact with teachers and continue to submit work regularly. Parents have commented very positively about the quality of the school’s remote education offer, and the support given to pupils who are learning at home.  Pupils with special educational needs and/or disabilities (SEND) are well supported. Most pupils with SEND attended school during periods of closure. Pupils with SEND who were learning at home were supported by regular contact from teachers and support staff. Support plans for pupils have been continually updated to reflect the impact of recent disruption. All staff receive regular training and support. Staff know how to support pupils with SEND in their classes.  Governors have a range of relevant expertise. They work very closely with

p.3

Main findings

leaders. Governors ensured that provision for pupils with SEND was a priority when some pupils were learning from home. In some subjects, especially mathematics, link governors have challenged and supported curriculum development effectively.  Leaders access a range of support from the local authority. The local authority has supported and challenged leaders on their approach to remote learning, for example. Local authority representatives have met with subject leaders to review curriculum plans. The support received is helping to improve aspects of the curriculum.

p.3

Evidence

This inspection was conducted remotely. We spoke to you, other senior leaders, representatives of those responsible for governance and a representative of the local authority to discuss leaders’ actions to provide education to all pupils during a national lockdown.

p.3

Evidence

We looked at responses to Ofsted’s online questionnaire, Parent View, including 60 free-text responses, and 45 staff questionnaires.

p.3

Evidence

I am copying this letter to the chair of the governing body, the regional schools commissioner and the director of children’s services for East Riding of Yorkshire. This letter will be published on the Ofsted website.

p.3

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion