Other · Ofsted report
Setting
Summary
Lydia Pride (lead), Tracey Reynolds
What we read, and from where
Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.
- Inspectorssingle source
Lydia Pride, Tracey Reynolds
- Postcode verified
BS37 6EW
Deep dive
What this report says
In plain English
Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.
Tone of the report
How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.
In line with other reports of this type.
How the report reads, start to finish
Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.
Strengths
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
No standout praise found.
Concerns
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
No strong criticism found.
Next steps
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- Since the school’s last section 5 inspection, several key staff have been appointed. p.2
- A special educational needs coordinator and assistant headteacher have joined the school, and a new head of science was appointed. p.2
- The school is expected to join a multi-academy trust on 1 April 2021. p.2
- The school has enhanced provision for pupils with autism spectrum disorder (ASD). p.2
- Approximately 80% of pupils were educated at home when the school was closed to most pupils at the start of the spring term. p.2
- During this time, approximately 70% of vulnerable pupils attended on site. p.2
- Over half of pupils with education, health and care (EHC) plans were learning on site. p.2
- At the time of this inspection, nearly all pupils were attending on site. p.2
What the report dwells on
Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.
Anatomy of the report
How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.
- Pages
- 3
- Words of findings
- 875
- about usual (typical 1049)
- Reading level
- Hard
- Flesch 48, typical 45
- Average sentence
- 17 words
- Next steps
- 8
- typical 5
- Hedged sentences
- 2%
- “some”, “not always”, “most”…
Where the words go
Full report text
Katherine Turner Headteacher Chipping Sodbury School Bowling Road Chipping Sodbury South Gloucestershire BS37 6EW
p.1
Additional, remote monitoring inspection of Chipping Sodbury School
Following my remote inspection with Lydia Pride, Her Majesty’s Inspector (HMI), of your school on 23 March 2021, I write on behalf of Her Majesty’s Chief Inspector of Education, Children’s Services and Skills to confirm the findings. Thank you for the help you gave during the inspection and for the time you made available to discuss the actions that have been taken to provide education to all pupils during the current circumstances.
p.1
Additional, remote monitoring inspection of Chipping Sodbury School
This monitoring inspection was conducted under section 8 (2) of the Education Act 2005 (as amended) and in accordance with Ofsted’s published procedures for visiting schools while routine inspections remain temporarily suspended. It was additional to the usual monitoring process for schools that are judged to require improvement.
p.1
Additional, remote monitoring inspection of Chipping Sodbury School
This monitoring inspection was carried out remotely. As such, the range of evidence available to inspectors was narrower than would normally be the case during an on- site inspection. As a result, this letter provides a more limited level of assurance than our usual monitoring reports.
p.1
Additional, remote monitoring inspection of Chipping Sodbury School
The inspection took place because the school has received three successive judgements of requires improvement. The school’s most recent section 5 inspection took place in June 2018.
p.1
Additional, remote monitoring inspection of Chipping Sodbury School
Having considered all the evidence and taking into account the impact of COVID-19 (coronavirus) on the school, I am of the opinion that at this time:
p.1
Leaders and those responsible for governance are taking effective action
to provide education in the current circumstances. Ofsted
p.1
Leaders and those responsible for governance are taking effective action
Store Street Manchester M1 2WD T 0300 123 1231 www.gov.uk/ofsted Leaders and those responsible for governance should take further action to:
p.1
Leaders and those responsible for governance are taking effective action
ensure each subject’s curriculum covers the essential knowledge that pupils need to learn over time.
p.2
Context
Since the school’s last section 5 inspection, several key staff have been appointed. A special educational needs coordinator and assistant headteacher have joined the school, and a new head of science was appointed.
p.2
Context
The school is expected to join a multi-academy trust on 1 April 2021.
p.2
Context
The school has enhanced provision for pupils with autism spectrum disorder (ASD).
p.2
Context
Approximately 80% of pupils were educated at home when the school was closed to most pupils at the start of the spring term. During this time, approximately 70% of vulnerable pupils attended on site. Over half of pupils with education, health and care (EHC) plans were learning on site.
p.2
Context
At the time of this inspection, nearly all pupils were attending on site.
p.2
Context
Leaders are managing a small number of staff who are absent due to shielding requirements related to COVID-19.
p.2
Main findings
Leaders and governors were resolute in their determination to provide an education for pupils during the recent lockdown. Leaders improved remote education in response to parents’ and pupils’ feedback. Staff supported pupils to maintain daily routines and continuity of learning. Leaders carefully considered the needs of pupils and staff when planning the return of all pupils to school, resulting in a smooth transition to on-site learning.
p.2
Main findings
Leaders thought carefully about the curriculum to ensure that it reflects their ambition for pupils. They have broadened the key stage 3 curriculum so that pupils learn a wide range of subjects for longer. Subject leaders have developed curriculums that outline content. However, these are not yet sufficiently detailed to enable pupils to build successfully on what they have learned.
p.2
Main findings
Teachers assessed pupils’ work during the recent period of remote education to find out what pupils know and understand. They have identified where there are gaps in pupils’ knowledge and are adapting the curriculum accordingly. Teachers are supporting pupils in Years 11 and 13 to complete their examination courses. Leaders have suitable plans in place that balance the demands of the forthcoming assessments with pupils’ well-being. Leaders have identified pupils who require additional support with reading and numeracy. Staff have put in place appropriate programmes to support these pupils. For example, pupils are following a carefully sequenced phonics programme that is helping them to improve their reading.
p.2
Main findings
Leaders have strengthened the provision for pupils with special educational needs and/or disabilities (SEND). Staff have received training so they can better meet the needs of pupils with SEND. The SEND team has worked closely with pupils and parents to identify useful strategies to support pupils’ learning. Sixth-form students with an EHC plan have been supported on site throughout the spring term. Staff from the Access Centre and across the school collaborate well to support pupils with ASD.
p.3
Main findings
Governors are ambitious for the school and have a secure knowledge of its strengths and weaknesses. They have provided additional support to leaders throughout the pandemic and have been mindful of the well-being of staff. Governors have worked well with leaders to bring about school improvement.
p.3
Main findings
The school has welcomed support from external sources, including the local authority and school improvement partner. They have helped leaders to make improvements to the curriculum.
p.3
Evidence
This inspection was conducted remotely. We spoke to you, other senior leaders, the chair of the governing body and a representative of the local authority to discuss leaders’ actions to provide education to all pupils during a national lockdown.
p.3
Evidence
We also reviewed school documentation, sampled pupils’ work and looked at remote lesson resources. We looked at responses to Ofsted’s online questionnaire, Parent View, including 74 free-text responses, and 79 staff questionnaires.
p.3
Evidence
I am copying this letter to the chair of the governing body, the regional schools commissioner and the director of children’s services for South Gloucestershire. This letter will be published on the Ofsted website.
p.3
Discuss this inspection
Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.
Join the discussion