Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Other · Ofsted report

Setting

Inspected — · published 11 May 2021

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

Stephen Bentham (lead), Alyson Middlemass

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspectorssingle source

    Alyson Middlemass, Stephen Bentham

  • Postcode verified

    WA10 4QH

Page 1 of 4
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+16Mostly positivemore positive than 33% of reports of this type

In line with other reports of this type.

Praisesuccessfullyconfidenteffectiveknowledgeableeffectivelyskilledaccuratelyclear
Criticismweaknesseslacklimitedmisseddelayedstruggleslow

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsAbout the inspectionWhat needs to improve positive critical
  • Findings1034w+12
  • What needs to improve213w+33

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No strong criticism found.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
4
Words of findings
1,232
about usual (typical 1049)
Reading level
Hard
Flesch 47, typical 45
Average sentence
16 words
Next steps
8
typical 5
Hedged sentences
7%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 81%What needs to improve 17%About the inspection 3%

Full report text

Andrew Rannard Headteacher De La Salle School Mill Brow Eccleston St Helens Merseyside WA10 4QH

p.1

Additional, remote monitoring inspection of De La Salle School

Following my remote inspection with Stephen Bentham, Her Majesty’s Inspector (HMI), of your school on 30 March 2021, I write on behalf of Her Majesty’s Chief Inspector of Education, Children’s Services and Skills to confirm the findings. Thank you for the help you gave during the inspection and for the time you made available to discuss the actions that have been taken to provide education to all pupils during the current circumstances.

p.1

Additional, remote monitoring inspection of De La Salle School

This monitoring inspection was conducted under section 8 (2) of the Education Act 2005 (as amended) and in accordance with Ofsted’s published procedures for visiting schools while routine inspections remain temporarily suspended. It was additional to the usual monitoring process for schools that are judged to require improvement.

p.1

Additional, remote monitoring inspection of De La Salle School

This monitoring inspection was carried out remotely. As such, the range of evidence available to inspectors was narrower than would normally be the case during an on- site inspection. As a result, this letter provides a more limited level of assurance than our usual monitoring reports.

p.1

Additional, remote monitoring inspection of De La Salle School

The inspection took place because the school had two successive judgements of requires improvement at its previous section 5 inspections. The school’s most recent section 5 inspection took place in February 2020.

p.1

Additional, remote monitoring inspection of De La Salle School

Having considered all the evidence and taking into account the impact of COVID-19 (coronavirus) on the school, I am of the opinion that at this time:

p.1

Leaders and those responsible for governance are taking effective action

to provide education in the current circumstances.

p.1

Leaders and those responsible for governance are taking effective action

Leaders and those responsible for governance should take further action to: Ofsted

p.1

Leaders and those responsible for governance are taking effective action

Store Street Manchester M1 2WD T 0300 123 1231 www.gov.uk/ofsted  develop teachers’ knowledge of phonics so that they can support pupils who need additional help to become fluent and confident readers.

p.1

Context

 Since the previous inspection, two deputy headteachers have temporarily been seconded to other schools. Four teachers have left the school.

p.2

Context

 Three members of staff have been temporarily promoted onto the senior leadership team. This includes: an acting deputy headteacher; an acting assistant headteacher and an acting lead practitioner. Three other members of staff have taken up temporary leadership roles on the pastoral team. Four teachers have joined the school.

p.2

Context

 In the spring term 2021, prior to the school re-opening to all pupils, approximately nine tenths of pupils were educated at home. During the same period, just under one third of vulnerable pupils, and approximately one fifth of pupils with an education, health and care plan, attended school.

p.2

Context

 At the time of this inspection, almost all pupils were attending school. A small proportion of pupils were self-isolating. A very small number of pupils were initially reluctant to return to school. They are now attending school after discussion with leaders.

p.2

Main findings

 When the pandemic began, you quickly provided electronic devices so that all pupils had equal access to learning when studying remotely. In the months that followed, you ensured that staff were knowledgeable about the systems and approaches required to deliver the online curriculum successfully. As such, teachers can seamlessly switch between online and in-school curriculum delivery, as required. For example, pupils currently self-isolating at home study the same curriculum as their peers. Consequently, pupils have continued to receive an education in these difficult times.

p.2

Main findings

 In the last 12 months, you and other leaders quickly tackled the lack of breadth and ambition that was evident in some subject curriculums. You secured an external consultant to provide curriculum advice and guidance. As a result, you made appropriate changes to the curriculum, which are benefiting current pupils’ learning, particularly in key stage 3. Nevertheless, you have identified that some subject curriculums require further development.

p.2

Main findings

 Since the pandemic began, subject leaders have carefully amended the order in which some topics are taught. Leaders have also modified how they teach certain subject content. For example, in geography, teachers have developed a virtual fieldwork project. This was to enable pupils to demonstrate their knowledge of fieldwork techniques.  In recent weeks, teachers have made additional checks to identify what pupils know and can remember from their previous learning. Since the school reopened to all pupils, leaders are successfully getting pupils back on track with their learning.

p.2

Main findings

 In Year 7, teachers’ checks have revealed that pupils have a variety of missing subject knowledge. Teachers are working effectively with Year 7 pupils to find out which aspects of the primary curriculum have been missed or forgotten from the summer term 2020.

p.3

Main findings

 You recognise the importance of ensuring that pupils are confident readers. Prior to the national restrictions, you had a plan in place to extend teachers’ knowledge of phonics. However, this work has been partially delayed by the pandemic. Added to this, when pupils returned in the autumn term 2020, staff identified a higher than usual number of Year 7 pupils who are behind with their reading. To date, staff have not had the training that they need to enable them to accurately identify the weaknesses in pupils’ phonic knowledge. This means that some teachers are not adept in supporting pupils who struggle the most with reading.

p.3

Main findings

 Year 11 teachers are successfully determining whether pupils are struggling to recall key knowledge and they are correcting any misunderstandings. Teachers have provided Year 11 pupils with curriculum time to revisit and embed important subject content. This work is effective in helping pupils to prepare for their next stage in education, employment, and training.

p.3

Main findings

 Leaders have a clear oversight of vulnerable pupils, including those with special educational needs and/or disabilities (SEND). Staff make regular contact with these pupils and their families. Accordingly, if issues arise, leaders make sure that help is given from suitably skilled professionals. Aside from this, pupils with SEND benefit from the expertise of teaching assistants. Guided by the special educational needs coordinator, teaching assistants appropriately adapt some subject resources for pupils with SEND. This helps these pupils to learn well in class and remotely.

p.3

Main findings

 Throughout the pandemic, members of the governing body have kept in regular contact with you. Governors know the school well. They provide effective challenge and guidance to you and other leaders. In the last 12 months, governors have not allowed the pace of their work to slow. They have remained focused on the long-term school improvement priorities. As such, they are resolute in their determination to strengthen further the education for pupils at De La Salle School.

p.3

Main findings

 The local authority continues to provide support and challenge to the school. The Archdiocese of Liverpool has supported leaders to improve their curriculum plans. Consequently, pupils’ education is broader and richer than it was before.

p.3

Evidence

This inspection was conducted remotely. We spoke with you, other senior leaders, members of the governing body and representatives of the Archdiocese of Liverpool and of the local authority. We also spoke with the school improvement partner. We met with subject leaders, members of the teaching staff, two teaching assistants and two groups of pupils. This was to discuss leaders’ actions to provide education to all pupils during a national lockdown.

p.4

Evidence

We looked at the minutes of the full governing body meetings and other documentation provided by the school. This included a selection of curriculum plans and examples of the education provided to pupils when they were learning remotely. We looked at the 176 responses to Ofsted’s online questionnaire, Parent View, including the 167 free-text responses. We also reviewed the 105 responses to Ofsted’s staff questionnaire.

p.4

Evidence

I am copying this letter to the chair of the governing body, the director of education for the Archdiocese of Liverpool, the regional schools commissioner and the director of children’s services for St Helens. This letter will be published on the Ofsted website.

p.4

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion