Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Other · Ofsted report

Setting

Inspected —

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

Tessa Holledge (lead), Fyfe Johnston

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspectorssingle source

    Fyfe Johnston, Tessa Holledge

  • Postcode verified

    PE29 6JA

Page 1 of 4
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

−21Mixedmore positive than 14% of reports of this type

Reads more critically than most reports of this type.

Praiseeffectivelyswiftlysafe
Criticismdisruptionlimiteddelayedmissedgaps

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsAbout the inspectionWhat needs to improve positive critical
  • Findings896w−21
  • What needs to improve159w0

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No standout praise found.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No strong criticism found.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
4
Words of findings
1,039
about usual (typical 1049)
Reading level
Fairly hard
Flesch 50, typical 45
Average sentence
17 words
Next steps
7
typical 5
Hedged sentences
3%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 83%What needs to improve 15%About the inspection 2%

Full report text

Hannah Connor-James Headteacher Cromwell Academy Parkway Huntingdon Cambridgeshire PE29 6JA

p.1

Additional, remote monitoring inspection of Cromwell Academy

Following my remote inspection with Tessa Holledge, Her Majesty’s Inspector (HMI), of your school on 18 March 2021, I write on behalf of Her Majesty’s Chief Inspector of Education, Children’s Services and Skills to confirm the findings. Thank you for the help you gave during the inspection and for the time you made available to discuss the actions that have been taken to provide education to all pupils during the current circumstances.

p.1

Additional, remote monitoring inspection of Cromwell Academy

This monitoring inspection was conducted under section 8 (2) of the Education Act 2005 (as amended) and in accordance with Ofsted’s published procedures for visiting schools while routine inspections remain temporarily suspended. It was additional to the usual monitoring process for schools that are judged to require improvement.

p.1

Additional, remote monitoring inspection of Cromwell Academy

This monitoring inspection was carried out remotely. As such, the range of evidence available to inspectors was narrower than would normally be the case during an on- site inspection. As a result, this letter provides a more limited level of assurance than our usual monitoring reports.

p.1

Additional, remote monitoring inspection of Cromwell Academy

The inspection took place because the school has received two successive judgements of requires improvement. The school’s most recent section 5 inspection took place in September 2019.

p.1

Additional, remote monitoring inspection of Cromwell Academy

Having considered all the evidence and taking into account the impact of COVID-19 on the school, I am of the opinion that at this time:

p.1

Leaders and those responsible for governance are taking effective action

to provide education in the current circumstances. Ofsted

p.1

Leaders and those responsible for governance are taking effective action

Store Street Manchester M1 2WD T 0300 123 1231 www.gov.uk/ofsted Leaders and those responsible for governance should take further action to:

p.1

Leaders and those responsible for governance are taking effective action

 ensure subject leaders continue to have the training they need to support teachers to deliver each curriculum subject to a high standard.

p.2

Context

 Since the previous inspection, staffing has remained stable. One governor has left the governing body and a community governor has been appointed in their place. The multi-academy trust is seeking to appoint another governor to the governing body.

p.2

Context

 Just over half of pupils were educated at home in the spring term before the school fully re-opened to all pupils. Two thirds of vulnerable pupils were educated on site during the national lockdown. All pupils with an education health and care plan (EHC plan) were also educated on site during this time.

p.2

Context

 At the time of the inspection no pupils were being educated at home.

p.2

Main findings

 Leaders launched a revised curriculum at the start of this academic year. An external advisor led training for subject leaders. However, this work was delayed by the most recent national lockdown. Leaders recognise that this training will have to be resumed to fully support teachers in effectively putting the revised curriculum into place for all subjects.

p.2

Main findings

 Leaders prioritised making sure that pupils had access to their learning, whether they were in school or learning at home. Earlier in the school year, leaders checked whether pupils had the technology they needed to learn from home. Where this wasn’t the case, leaders provided pupils with the electronic devices pupils needed. In January, when the most recent national lockdown started, pupils’ learning was swiftly moved online so pupils could access their learning remotely.

p.2

Main findings

 Throughout the pandemic, leaders have minimised any disruption to pupils’ learning. Teachers have adjusted planning according to pupils’ needs at home and in school. Teachers have provided resources the pupils need to complete their lessons at home. Whenever possible, leaders have ensured that teachers have delivered the usual curriculum to pupils, both when pupils were learning at home and at school. Currently, there are no pupils learning from home. If this changes, teachers will resume their teaching remotely.

p.2

Main findings

 Leaders have made sure that reading has remained a priority. For younger pupils, phonics lessons continued during the spring term, whether they were learning in school or at home. When pupils needed it, teachers made sure that additional support was provided to help pupils develop their reading strategies. Older pupils have benefitted from accessing books in school and online that are carefully matched to their reading ability. This is helping pupils develop and extend their reading skills.

p.2

Main findings

 Leaders have made sure that teachers continue to check how well pupils have been learning in their lessons. The information from these checks has helped teachers plan a specialist curriculum for the pupils’ return to school. This has ensured that pupils have had the support they need to access the full range of subjects in the school’s curriculum prior to the Easter break.

p.3

Main findings

 For the summer term, leaders plan to continue to adjust the curriculum. The checks teachers have carried out have informed teachers which knowledge pupils may have missed or have forgotten. Teachers are planning support across the summer term to help pupils bridge these gaps and catch up on what they need to, mainly in their reading, writing and mathematics learning.

p.3

Main findings

 Leaders have made sure vulnerable pupils and pupils with special educational needs and/or disabilities (SEND) have been supported well during the current circumstances. For pupils learning at home, one-to-one support and small breakout groups have been available online. This smaller group support has ensured that pupils with SEND have not fallen far behind where they would normally be at this time of year.

p.3

Main findings

 Governors check how well leaders and staff are supporting pupils. Governors receive training from the local authority. They also received useful advice from the multi-academy trust. Governors are well informed and know what is happening at the school. They challenge and support leaders appropriately.

p.3

Main findings

 The trust has provided valuable support. Specialists have been appointed to develop leaders’ plans for the curriculum. The trust has also checked procedures at school, to keep the pupils safe in the current circumstances. Leaders feel supported by the trust’s constructive advice.

p.3

Evidence

This inspection was conducted remotely. We spoke to you, other senior leaders, the multi-academy trust chief executive officer, pupils, staff, representatives of those responsible for governance, and an external advisor to discuss leaders’ actions to provide education to all pupils during a national lockdown.

p.3

Evidence

We also heard pupils read, looked at governors’ minutes and a parent survey. We looked at 38 responses to Ofsted’s online questionnaire, Parent View, including 22 free-text responses, and 27 staff questionnaires.

p.3

Evidence

I am copying this letter to the chair of the governing body, chair of the board of trustees and the chief executive officer of the Aces multi-academy trust, the regional schools commissioner and the director of children’s services for Cambridgeshire County Council. This letter will be published on the Ofsted website. Yours sincerely

p.3

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion