Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Other · Ofsted report

Setting

Inspected — · published 7 May 2021

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

Noeman Anwar (lead), Andrea Bedeau

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspectorssingle source

    Andrea Bedeau, Noeman Anwar

  • Postcode verified

    TW2 5EG

Page 1 of 4
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

−2Mixedmore positive than 23% of reports of this type

In line with other reports of this type.

Praiseconsistentlyeffectiveknowledgeableconsistentimproving
Criticisminconsistentlimitedstruggledelayed

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsAbout the inspectionWhat needs to improve positive critical
  • Findings768w−12
  • What needs to improve228w+33

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No standout praise found.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No strong criticism found.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
4
Words of findings
981
about usual (typical 1049)
Reading level
Fairly hard
Flesch 52, typical 45
Average sentence
15 words
Next steps
8
typical 5
Hedged sentences
8%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 75%What needs to improve 22%About the inspection 3%

Full report text

Fiona Optholt Acting Headteacher Trafalgar Junior School Elmsleigh Road Twickenham Middlesex TW2 5EG

p.1

Additional, remote monitoring inspection of Trafalgar Junior School

Following my remote inspection with Noeman Anwar, Her Majesty’s Inspector (HMI), of your school on 18 March 2021, I write on behalf of Her Majesty’s Chief Inspector of Education, Children’s Services and Skills to confirm the findings. Thank you for the help you gave during the inspection and for the time you made available to discuss the actions that have been taken to provide education to all pupils during the current circumstances.

p.1

Additional, remote monitoring inspection of Trafalgar Junior School

This monitoring inspection was conducted under section 8 (2) of the Education Act 2005 (as amended) and in accordance with Ofsted’s published procedures for visiting schools while routine inspections remain temporarily suspended. It was additional to the usual monitoring process for schools that are judged to require improvement.

p.1

Additional, remote monitoring inspection of Trafalgar Junior School

This monitoring inspection was carried out remotely. As such, the range of evidence available to inspectors was narrower than would normally be the case during an on- site inspection. As a result, this letter provides a more limited level of assurance than our usual monitoring reports.

p.1

Additional, remote monitoring inspection of Trafalgar Junior School

The inspection took place because the school has received two successive judgements of requires improvement. The school’s most recent section 5 inspection took place in September 2019.

p.1

Additional, remote monitoring inspection of Trafalgar Junior School

Having considered all the evidence and taking into account the impact of COVID-19 (coronavirus) on the school, I am of the opinion that at this time:

p.1

Leaders and those responsible for governance are taking effective action

to provide education in the current circumstances. Ofsted

p.1

Leaders and those responsible for governance are taking effective action

Store Street Manchester M1 2WD T 0300 123 1231 www.gov.uk/ofsted Leaders and those responsible for governance should take further action to:

p.1

Leaders and those responsible for governance are taking effective action

 ensure the phonics programme is delivered consistently throughout the school to teach reading to those pupils who are unable to decode and blend sounds

p.2

Leaders and those responsible for governance are taking effective action

 implement the new plans in all subjects and continue to develop subject leaders’ expertise so that they can monitor their subjects across the school.

p.2

Context

 The headteacher left the school in July 2020. Governors appointed an acting headteacher for the federation and an acting headteacher of the junior school. Senior leaders who were already working at the schools took up these posts in September 2020. The headteacher of a local school is currently supporting senior leaders. These temporary appointments will remain in place until September 2021.

p.2

Context

 Approximately 80% of pupils were educated remotely at the start of the spring term. Almost all vulnerable pupils were educated on site. 80% of pupils with education, health and care plans were educated in school.

p.2

Context

 At the time of the inspection, all pupils were being educated on site.

p.2

Context

 A small proportion of staff were absent due to COVID-19 at the time of the inspection. Leaders have made suitable arrangements, including using existing staff, to cover these absences. Some staff were also providing education remotely.

p.2

Main findings

 Leaders have made sure that pupils are being taught the full range of subjects. Teachers check what pupils have learned and remembered in lessons. Leaders are using this information to adapt their plans for the summer term. Leaders make sure that teachers continue to use some online learning systems. This is in case remote education is required in the future.

p.2

Main findings

 After the previous inspection, leaders reviewed the curriculum and started to make changes. This work was delayed due to COVID-19. Leaders work with different organisations to help them develop their subject knowledge. You and your team have created new subject plans. Subject leaders work with teachers to check how these plans are being implemented. The plans to review physical education and design and technology are not as well established as other subjects. Leaders aim to get back on track by the end of July 2021.

p.2

Main findings

 Leaders introduced a new phonics programme and some staff received training in how to use it. Teachers use it to support some pupils who struggle with reading. Teachers track pupils’ progress and allocate books matched to their reading ability. Teachers use a different phonics programme to support pupils in Years 5 and 6. As a result, the support teachers and teaching assistants provide is inconsistent. Leaders should prioritise training to ensure that staff use a consistent approach to teaching phonics.

p.2

Main findings

 Leaders provide appropriate support for vulnerable pupils and those with special educational needs and/or disabilities (SEND). Pupils’ timetables include help in class and additional sessions. The timings for any extra sessions are planned so that pupils do not miss other subjects. Leaders check that what is provided is appropriate and make changes if needed. Therapists work with pupils with SEND. Leaders and therapists deliver training for staff, parents and carers. This is so that they know which approaches to use to help pupils.

p.3

Main findings

 Leaders share their subject plans with governors. Governors challenge leaders to demonstrate that the plans are effective. Governors have created a schedule of school visits and meetings with subject leaders to check how the plans are implemented. As a result, governors are knowledgeable about the progress subject leaders are making. Some governor visits have been delayed because of COVID-19.

p.3

Main findings

 Leaders work with the local authority to improve the school. Local authority partners worked with governors to create stability in senior leadership. This has enabled the work on improving subjects to happen. Subject leaders work with leaders in the local authority and subject experts to create plans. This is helping subject leaders to develop their expertise. For example, the school improvement partner’s recommendations led to changes in the way reading is taught. Not all subject leaders have benefited from this support because of the COVID-19 pandemic.

p.3

Evidence

This inspection was conducted remotely. We spoke to you, other senior leaders, staff, representatives of those responsible for governance and a representative of the local authority to discuss leaders’ actions to provide education to all pupils during a national lockdown.

p.3

Evidence

We also carried out a ‘visit’ to a lesson. We looked at responses to Ofsted’s online questionnaire, Parent View, including 209 free-text responses, and 36 staff questionnaires.

p.3

Evidence

I am copying this letter to the chair of the governing body, the regional schools commissioner and the director of children’s services for Richmond upon Thames. This letter will be published on the Ofsted website. Yours sincerely

p.3

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion